Fallen Freedom

Liberalism and Progress

2010-01-13T00:51:00.014-05:00

You’ve probably heard the claim by liberals and leftists that they consider themselves progressive. This is not disputed in mainstream discourse by even the liberal’s kept opponents so they’ve given their passive approval to this connotative larceny. Kinda like buggery being “gay”.

It is a bit of a stretch to associate the two (liberalism and progress) assuming one actually compares the agenda of The Left* with the definition of progress. Beyond a stretch it’s an obliteration of all pretext of objective meaning. Let’s examine.

Here is the definition of progress:

1 a (1) : a royal journey marked by pomp and pageant (2) : a state procession b : a tour or circuit made by an official (as a judge) c : an expedition, journey, or march through a region
2 : a forward or onward movement (as to an objective or to a goal) : advance
3 : gradual betterment; especially : the progressive development of humankind

Especially relevant is the third and it is what is clearly implied in how progressivism is thrown around the mainstream political domain. Gradual betterment.

Now here is the agenda of the modern progressive political ideology as represented by the platform of the Vermont Progressive Party. I’m sure there would be some haggling among Liberals/Progressives on some of these positions but taken as a whole I think it is a fair representation. This is pulled from Wikipedia hence the “they want…” After each plank I’ll add comments within [].

In terms of agriculture, their goal is to protect family farmers and their land in order to be capable of dealing with global climate change.

[Okay they started out good here since understanding the importance and necessity of protecting the production of real food raised by farmers as part of an organic family is foundational to most healthy societies. But why the hell do they condition it (“to be capable of”) on a supposed change to the world’s climate? It should be stood on its own.]

On civil rights, the state and local government should have affirmative action programs for full and equal access to jobs, housing, education, and public accommodations. There should be a "zero tolerance" policy against any form of discrimination or harassment. The VPP is pro-gay rights, pro-choice, pro-Equal Rights Amendment, and wants to expand First Amendment rights in the workplace.

[”Civil Rights” means the destruction of freedom of association for all people in theory but in reality only affects whites because of certain racial realities and legal/political double standards. Who is bettered by this? “Affirmative Action” means state-sponsored group entitlement (for preferred groups) and punishment (for whites). If there’s a zero tolerance of discrimination how can they support Affirmative Action? AA IS discrimination. What is “harassment”? Someone daring to oppose their dispossession as brought about by this type of agenda. Faggotry, abortion, and unisexualization aren’t progress; they are all anti-life. Is death progressive?]

In terms of the criminal justice system, it is anti-death penalty and it wants to focus on programs that keep people out of prison and from committing crimes in the first place.

[Failed policies purporting to rehabilitate psychopaths is progress? It is idiocy. There are a small percentage of people who will kill/steal/swindle/rape unceasingly or be killed. Modern prisons have to be among the most corrupting institutions that exist. Have these progressive advocates ever heard of prison rape? Is there anything more degrading? It’s no surprise that a victim of this is going to want to lash out at the society that not only allowed it but promoted it. A progressive view is to dramatically expand the use of the death penalty with a simultaneously drastic reduction in prisons along with a reform of how they function.]

For the economy they want to promote unions, living wages, full employment, locally owned businesses, and other things such as a $7.50 minimum wage.

[Promoting unions and wage floors and full employment? Did they even think when they wrote this up? One of the functions of unions is to limit the pool of labor available to a prospective employer so unions by definition create unemployment. Same thing with the minimum/living wage; it creates unemployment. My point here is not to say one or the other of these points is really progressive but to clarify their incompatibility. Not all people can or want to work. Some people are predatory and others are non-functional for other reasons. A political ideology that seriously wants to better Man must first understand that Man is not a commodity. There is full spectrum of quality from phenomenal to refuse. Man is no different from other life forms in this regards. Man is not interchangeable in a given ecology. A progressive system must allow for a natural vetting to occur.]

Educational policies they support include mainstreaming special education children, changing which taxes fund schools, and increased funding for higher education.

[There are limited resources in the real world to do anything so enhancing the education going to people with special needs detracts from that received by the average and exceptional students. All societies live or die based on the achievements and/or failures of their elite. Is the leveling of educational opportunities progress or regress? Based on the reality of intra-group and inter-group differences then this is progress only if giving an oak sapling and a daisy the same amount of water is also progress. Higher education for the masses of people definitely falls under the concept of diminishing marginal returns. Some gain is to be had but at costs far in excess including an expanded childhood and increased debt. The education/indoctrination racket benefits but not the society at large. Real progress involves seeing what works and applying it, not conforming to some feel-good template of stale and failed ideas.]

Environmentally, they want to undo the damage already done, prevent more from occurring (i.e. enforce the limits for pollution runoff), and protect Act 250 which allows citizen input into how land is developed.

[Act 250 is some Vermont thing but the rest is a bunch of fluff along the lines of being for baseball and apple pie. The question is how do we live within our environment holistically rather than abusing it to serve profits and ease.]

On families and children, the party calls for things such as affordable daycare, 12 weeks of maternity/paternity leave, and the ability of mothers to breastfeed in public.

[So it’s progress to continue the outsourcing of motherhood, aka daycare? Also how is it progress to pit men and women against each other in the work force such that one even needs to advocate leave. A progressive view would not only not promote women in the labor pool at the cost of men (affirmative action) but would actively discourage them since the healthy, organic family is characterized by masculine provision. I agree mother’s milk is better than baby formula so they got that one.]

In terms of government reform, they advocate for financial disclosure of candidates, instant runoff voting, and proportional representation in the state legislature.

[I doubt the Federal and State governments are quivering from such reform proposals since both need radical surgery to initiate progress not candy-coated vitamins.]

They advocate that healthcare should be universal and affordable for all.

[The healthcare industry is the receiving tentacle of the USA’s industrial food leviathan. The allopathic medical Western approach of conquering nature is a failure in many ways not the least of which is its primary objective of profit. A patient is a cash cow to the industry and their humanity is an afterthought. Health and wellness are affordable already. What’s not affordable is the modern industrial health system. It’s a racket fed in large part by the complementary industry of factory food. Mass produce synthetic, processed food by raping the environment and profits are made on the front end. The masses of people who consume this convenient and nominally cheap “food” for a lifetime then go out the back end for treatment of their chronic diseases generating more profits. Profit is not bad per se if it is kept in its place. In the West humanity is a commodity to both the capitalist and the communist. Allowing that beast to feed even more at the public teat is not exactly what I’d call progress. But conforming to the mold of what-a-caring-person-is-supposed-to-do is apparently what matters.]

They support affordable and public housing.

[”Affordable” housing sounds good but this should be a natural result of a society in-balance with just laws. Creating public housing to fix any flaws in the present system is more treatment of people as commodities – as lodging consumption units. If housing is not affordable to the masses of common folk then something else is very wrong requiring remedy. Handouts are the most dehumanizing anti-progress scheme that can be proposed for free people. If this proposal is for people incapable of functioning without the assistance of others I would ask how is it progressive for them to be sustained in this artificial fashion. Shouldn’t progressive life be characterized by sustainability and advancement? Providing for the perpetually weak by burdening the strong may be a lot of things but not a means of achieving progress.]

They encourage the development of personal privacy standards that guarantee how personally identifiable information is collected and distributed.

[Given the Police State that is slowly taking over in the USA this concern is understandable. Still it should be clear that this police state is not primarily concerned with typical individuals indulging in personally destructive behavior but with people attached to groups which threaten its hegemony. So, is progressivism joined at the hip to the Cult of the Individual? If so, why? Is it not characteristic of real progress to understand that there is a balance between the individual and the society they are a part of?]

They support cutting taxes for most citizens, and awareness of the social impact of taxation.

[Understanding the need to remove power from the government by moderating its claims on the fruits of its citizens is certainly progress. Unfortunately it is not compatible with the balance of this nanny-esque platform.]

In terms of transportation they support fixing the roads that exist before building new ones, supporting mass transportation systems over roads, eliminating excessive trucking, the idea that cars are a public health threat, and the need to "protect the livability of Vermont communities."

[I see nothing here that is anti-progress. So that is certainly progress in their platform.]

In terms of utilities they advocate for any restructuring to benefit citizens, and are against bailouts for utility companies. They promote local public power, renewables, efficiency, and conservation, and want to close the Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant without selling it. They also want to strengthen the Certificate of Public Goods Process.

[Bailouts aren’t good for corporate entities just as they aren’t good for individuals (e.g. public housing). I wonder what is progressive about closing a nuclear power plant given that all of the viable alternatives of generating massive amounts of electricity also generate pollution. There seems to be a certain pacifistic mindset against anything nuclear. Yes, alternatives that generate less or preferably no waste by-products should be pursued.]

If you are REALLY in favor of PROGRESS do you want to be associated with stale, failed, counter-intuitive, anti-reality, ugliness and stupidity subsidizing, feel good, arrogant, ideology? Progressivism as now defined is anti-progress taken as a whole. Shouldn’t the definition of progress be advancement in the quality of Man? Does this not then insure advancement in Man’s accomplishments? Technology is not an end; happiness is not an end; ease is not an end. All these can and do denigrate Man not advance him since they make him softer. If progressivism isn’t trying to better Man then what is it bettering?

There’s a short number from the Benny Hill Show that describes the relationship between liberalism and (real) progress perfectly. A rather flabby wife said confidently to her husband in thick cockney, “I’ve got the body of an eighteen year old girl”. To which he retorts, “You’d better give it back then. You’re getting it all wrinkled”.

* Left/Right, Liberal/Conservative, Democrat/Republican. The opposition of these supposed conflicting visions is an illusion. They both play a part in bringing about an eventual synthesis of Talmudic “progress” to the body of the West initiated by the Left’s actions and the Right’s reactions. But this dance is “ever to the left, never to the right” to invert the words from the musical 1776.

Pravda in the Kwa

2009-12-20T17:42:00.011-05:00

The following is a typical mainstream media news story regarding White Folk daring to try and organize as Whites for Whites. It set in northern Idaho in the same region where the Aryan Nations group earlier attempted to organize a greater white awakening. This region is still overwhelmingly white though it is becoming more “diverse” (non-white to those of you who haven’t yet overcome your public schooling) as time passes. That there are fewer and fewer places for us nasty “supremacists” to escape to without soon being followed by poor, pathetic “minorities” (90% of the worlds population and growing) who have a “right” to follow us wherever we go and be “persecuted” by us matters not a whit to these paragons of virtue. Sorry for all the “ ” but we live in a world now of such god-damned double talk almost every other word has to be explained if you are trying to explain “mainstream” discourse from the outside.

This article is so ham-handed and juvenile as to hopefully make any thinking man with a sliver of critical thinking faculty to blush even if he has not awakened racially. But this is the same “mainstream thinking” you will find represented anywhere in the U.S.A. from Boston to San Diego, Seattle to Miami and ALL places in between. Diversity is a code word for the replacement of the White Folk who founded this country, not a description of allowable opinions on the Final Solution to the White Problem. On that subject all respectable sources sing from the same hymnal. Whites – my people – must go according to all the lovers of diversity and tolerance.

My comments are included in []

Aryan Nations attempting return to North Idaho
Tania Dall | KXLY4 Reporter

Posted: 6:06 pm PST November 16, 2009Updated: 7:37 pm PST November 16, 2009

COEUR D'ALENE -- The Southern Poverty Law Center [The only thing it has to do with poverty is the poverty it CREATES through “legal” extortion and plunder of many White folk who have bravely and often alone fought to try and live free] estimates there are 17 chapters of the Aryan Nations across the country. While the Aryan Nations were bankrupted [Yep, bankrupted for their beliefs in this good ole Land of the Free that supposedly protects free speech. Think about that White Man. The reporter with the bird-brain that wrote this piece wouldn’t in a million years think that is an issue to possibly address. If she did she wouldn’t have a job. Only shills qualify as “journalists” in the kwa] out of North Idaho eight years ago there are small signs their hate [1st occurrence. Remember white people who are for our people and want to live free of state enforced “diversity” are full of hate. We and only we among all races must prove we don’t hate by inviting all other groups to live in our communities and take our daughters to make wonderful little hate-proof people of color] is making an attempt at a comeback.

It wasn’t uncommon several years ago to see downtown Coeur d’Alene turn into a battleground each summer, with Aryan Nations supporters parading through downtown, flanked by angry protestors [It needs to be made clear to any white folk who might possibly be sympathizing with these white heretics that “angry protesters” will be there to (righteously of course) give you a lot of hell since you are “haters” after all] and police officers up and down Sherman Avenue.

The last time the Neo-Nazi [I don’t know if the Aryan Nations purported to be national socialist or not – I suspect yes – but we all know “Nazi” in this article is supposed to convey “evil”, “wicked”, “monstrous” all wrapped into one, rather than describe a political philosophy] group marched down Sherman Avenue was several years ago but now followers claim to be regrouping.

“We hold monthly meetings and weekly church services. We try to get four major functions each year,” Paul Mullet, the self proclaimed national director of the Aryan Nations says.

Mullet’s goal is straightforward: He aims to pick up where Richard Butler left off.

Richard Butler, the founder of the Aryan Nations, first brought his brand of hate [2nd occurrence] to North Idaho in 1974 when he moved to Hayden and established the Aryan Nations World Headquarters. For more than two decades Butler shared his dream of a White-only homeland with recruits who came to his 20-acre compound.

In 1998 Butler’s dreams came to an end when Aryan Nations security guards shot at a woman and her son driving by the compound. Victoria and Jason Keenan sued and won a $6.3 Million lawsuit [Now I have not looked into this shooting in detail but I suspect there was some sort of provocation behind it. The shots did not even hit so maybe they were warning shots? Either way $6.3 Million for shooting at someone but causing neither injury nor death is not the norm in the U.S. legal system. It was obviously a pretext for Morris Dees to ride in on his white (make that black) horse and put the uppity white curs back in their place and ride off with a handsome booty and tons of accolades as a small fringe benefit] against the Aryan Nations three years later in 2001.

“For too long the Aryan Nations compound has been a haven for racists [I’m surprised it took so long for the R word to show up. White people wanting to live apart from every third worlder who has been imported here - to line the pockets of the same rich, power and money worshiping whites and jews who have created this mess and themselves live in gated communities - is a racist. Only people of color can do these things without being labeled in a way intended to bring disrepute] and I hope this jury verdict [Jury verdict. Yep Dees you’re a man of the people. People who day and night are indoctrinated into feeling shame at themselves and their ancestors and who only have an atomized future. People who are haters and racists if they dare feel any sympathy for their racial brethren who are daring to try and be free. People who are applauded for their “bravery” when they follow the state, the mass media, and every conceivable institution that exists but who are “cowardly” if they stand up to them. Yep, you’ve won them over with your skill, courage, morality, and rugged good looks] will put an end to that," Morris Dees, Chief Trial Counsel for the Southern Poverty Law Center and the Keenans’ attorney in the Aryan Nations case, said.

That judgment forced him into bankruptcy and kicked Butler off his compound [Everyone is now supposed to stand and applaud. Hallelujah]. Several months later his retreat was bulldozed over [You miserable white curs get the message don’t you? Not only do you get disparaged for standing up to us paragons of perfection and arbiters of all that is moral and just but your very property gets destroyed since it is unfit for decent humans to even use after you are removed]. Butler later died in 2004 [And then you die, got it?].

The voices of hate [3rd occurrence] were nearly silenced but now new voices are starting to emerge. [Create a Dracula, zombie-like image, of new monsters “emerging”]

“The Aryan Nations’ goal is to have an area where it’s an all white homeland and state, country," Paul Mullet said. [Allowing this statement through the censors is supposed to offend the sensibilities of indoctrinated whites who then recoil from it but it is a true statement that the remnant of surviving white folk will HAVE TO embrace.]

Mullet, 36, is originally from Ohio but has now made a new home for himself in Athol.

He denied requests from KXLY to attend one of his group meetings and only agreed to be interviewed after pre-screening the questions he would be asking. [Not trusting these media people is supposed to make Mullet look bad. Makes him look savvy to me]

Mullet says that this time the group is operating differently. [This skilled journalist is trying to direct the typical white newspaper reader to now think, “hmm, ‘this time’ eh? Why should we trust ‘em”?]

“If we're confronted we will protect ourselves but as far as us going out and doing violent acts like recent media attention has been giving the Aryan Nations, no. What was in the past is in the past what's now is now,” he said.

While the violence, according to Mullet, might be gone, [Yep, white “racists” and “haters” are presumed guilty until the court confirms it, legally of course] the message of hate [4th occurrence] remains the same. His goal, according to his website, is asking for recruits to “Fight the Jews and the mud people of the world." [After searching through 3 Google search pages looking for this web site and seeing up to then nothing but mass media and other “love” groups righteously waxing their hatred towards the “hater” I did find what may have been it. It wouldn’t open. Funny how that is and typical; 3 pages of being told what to think by our commissars of love and their paid-for government officials and the potential rebuttal of the accused is not even visible.]

“The black pride, the Zionist pride, the Indian pride, the list goes on where it’s OK for them to do that. But it's not okay for a white person to stand up and be proud of who they are,” Mullet said. [The censors made a mistake in letting this one through. The white slaves might actually begin to see a ray of light here.]

Mullet goes on to say today’s Aryan Nations members aren't who you might think they are.

“The skinhead mentality is really losing ground and it's more of white collar people, good jobs,” he said. [Dees must be salivating. He’ll be able to shake down a lot of old Jews who will see the gas chambers right around the corner.]

Over the summer the Aryan Nations group was caught circulating white pride fliers on front lawns in North Idaho and Spokane. The Coeur d'Alene Police Department charged Mullet and two followers with littering. [How heinous. If only they’d do likewise every November when the elephants and jackasses leave their pabulum filled fliers everywhere. Of course that is protected since it is harmless and useless. Real opposition to our scam system must be repressed and belittled by our free press.]

This month, three men were charged with malicious harassment. Court documents show they threatened a Hispanic family with a gun and a Pit bull while passing out hate [5th occurrence] literature in another Coeur d'Alene neighborhood. [First off why is this anecdote presented here? What does this have to do with Aryan Nations? Would this journalist have ever in a million years inserted a tidbit about the Christian/Newsome torture and murders in the middle of a story about the Nation of Islam? Also, last year in the same town a Hispanic man shot a White man in the face and killed him after supposedly the white man called the Hispanic a name (yes they did make that clear in the jewspaper). Of course “hate” was nowhere seen in that article except alluded to as coming from the dead White. A Hispanic KILLS a White man and it is just a random senseless act precipitated by White misdeeds. Three White men “threaten” a Hispanic and it is hate and worthy of prosecution and it can also be used to tar the pro-White group getting this Pravda-like coverage.]

“This is like basketball being played by very under talented short people,” Attorney Norm Gissel said. [Wow a bloodsucker and traitor gets to hurl demeaning insults knowing no defense is possible through this medium. What a man of courage. And if they are such losers why don’t you just ignore them?]

Norm Gissel was also part of the team that helped bankrupt Butler back in 2001. [If we survive he may rue that “accomplishment”. But he has his reward now and his masters can pat him on his self-righteous head and send him back to drive more stakes into vampires]

Gissel says this new attempt at a resurgence isn't as organized and doesn't hold the same political power that Butler's group managed to gain in Kootenai County.
“There is no place that they're wanted. [Says who you arrogant ass? Why can’t at least some White Folk be LEFT ALONE? I can think of many places you will be wanted if your masters ever get sent packing and Aryan justice returns the traditional verdict reserved for traitors. Hell, it probably won’t ever happen and you’ll happily get to see this region turned into another Brazil over the remainder of your putrid life. Where I lived most of my life in the East Whites have been mostly "cleansed". The quality of life has degenerated proportionately. This is something this human rights (clearly Whites don't qualify) activist wants to bring to this region.] I can't think of a single place in the world that would welcome Nazis at this time,” [Ever wonder why genius? Might it have anything to do with who runs the Western World and what is in and is not in THEIR interests? ] Gissel said.

To underscore Gissel’s point the community [Yep the mercenaries of our police state is a “community”] isn't turning a blind eye to the Aryan Nations’ presence [Funny that those same eagle eyes never seem to work as well when the organization in question is advocating in favor of every other group on the planet that now lives in this country]. In August, law enforcement agencies, mayors, politicians, and other local leaders got together at the state line. [All to stop a pygmy basketball team. What brave heroes.] Their message: Hate [6th occurrence] won't be tolerated here.

Denouncing racism [2nd occurrence] is one thing but the reality is that it continues to exist. [It will continue to exist in the minds of your masters until every last white person is wiped off the planet and turned into a malleable labor and consumption unit ensuring these masters' continued supremacy. Yes they are the real "supremacists" but since they pay the chattering shills the enemy must be found elsewhere.] Just ask Coeur d’Alene DJ “Juice” [There are very few regions left in this country that are overwhelmingly White and it is quickly worsening. DJ can go back to many of the fine negro enclaves of civilization like East St. Louis, New Orleans, or Detroit. Why would he want to be in the presence of "racists" who are doing everything in their power to avoid him and his people?], who skin tone makes him an automatic target for white supremacist [Mullet made it clear his group is separatist but “supremacist” sounds more evil and this journalist can’t let Aryan honesty get in the way of Talmudic lies] hate [7th occurrence].

“They just yell the "N" word and keep driving. Most of the time I don't hear them because I have my headphones on,” he said. [Negroes kill Whites and it’s local news at best. Say the N word and bring in the Feds.]

For 25 years now Juice has been connected to the area [Why did you ever come here Juice? You need to be around Whitey don’t you? You see real, evil supremacists do rule this country and treat you like dirt (though not as badly as the white masses are treated) but since they run things and make you think what they want they make separatists look bad. No offense, Blacks are good basketball players and singers and dancers and some other things but we neither want nor need you. You are here because you need us and the U.S. Government will not allow us to exclude you. They have proscribed a peaceful solution that would have been both in your interest and ours. Your people are treated like helpless children who always need aid. My people are burdened with providing it. The people that brought you here as slaves are the same ones forcing us together now. We should both hate them and work together for their destruction.] Despite a few negative mishaps, Juice remains positive. [Fine, remain positive but please leave.]

“North Idaho is a great place. [Yes, because it is full of White people and the order and decency we create.] Don't sell it short [please do] because a couple of knuckle heads don't agree with the majority of America," [Yes the majority of Americans betray the anti-racist brainwashing they have received from womb to tomb for 40+ years in ever increasing doses but there are some of us who still – get this – don’t want our people genocided and asking us what we care about the thoughts of the majority of Americans is like asking the rooster to respect a vote of what’s for dinner if the electorate’s only other members were two foxes] he said.

“We're Americans,” [That’s what the people with the guns say so you’ve got that one for now] he continued. “We earn the right to be free [My people slaughtered each other to free your people. Your people never even fought to avoid their chains much less fought to remove them] and say what you need to or whatever you want to say. It might not be right [what’s more right, a people groups right to life and freedom and living space or the Jew’s (and their lackey’s ) right to dominate and ruin?], it might not be the politically correct thing to say but nevertheless they can say it." [At least until the Master Race helps push through hate speech laws to prevent them and their current tools from being named and criticized]

Freedom of speech is one thing but if you ask Norm Gissel what can happen when hate [8th occurrence] is left to its own devices his answer is simple. Innocent people can get hurt. [Innocent people are much more often hurt when those of your “profession” help a child molester or rapist or murderer to be acquitted or get a reduced sentence. You don’t care about pain to innocent people; you care about accolades – since your “Civil Rights” crusading is loved by the powers that be - and wealth]

“Tell me a point in history where being silent about Nazis benefited anybody but Nazis. [Uh, let’s see. National Socialism arose organically from the German people and served their interests until the people you serve brought all the world’s power in to destroy them. So whenever National Socialism has ever been on the ballot and could be discussed prior to the demonization campaign against it it won. By not “being silent” on it you mean that IT must be silenced. You mean that any pro-White political movement must be silenced. We have no voice now and you mean to continue to play your part in keeping it so.] You have to talk about it. [What talk is there? There are law suits and cops and property theft through the legal system. Some discussion huh? If you were willing to talk/discuss the issue you would first have to grant the point that White people also have a right to live as is currently granted every other group but once you grant that you lose. You can’t let it get that far hence everything is “Hate”, “Racism”, and “Nazism”.] You have to raise that issue," [You simply demonize and silence the opposition. You aren’t raising an issue like Roberts Rules are being followed] Gissel said.

Mullet remains undeterred toward his detractors. He says North Idaho is his final stop and it’s where he’s setting up shop.

“In September we're going to have a congress in Idaho. I've got plans and a permit for a rally in Hayden,” Mullet said.

The City of Hayden says it has not issued a permit for an Aryan Nations rally but did say someone came and asked about the process. Mullet has also said that he plans to buy land and build a new Aryan Nations compound in North Idaho.

Despite Mullet’s plans for the Aryan Nations in North Idaho attorney Norm Gissel doesn’t see the hate [9th occurrence] started by Richard Butler making a comeback with Mullet’s arrival.

“Do they have any staying power? No. Is that a victory for all of us? [White man is nowhere man, white man is everyman; everything we have is theirs but theirs is theirs alone, even if they took it from us] Yes,” Gissel said.

[End of article]

So there you have it. I so rarely consume the white-hating sewage called the mainstream media (be it entertainment or news) anymore that even I am amazed how predictable a subject like this is presented even if I only read one relevant story like this a year. This was not even an opinion piece but the supposedly less unbiased content. This “news” story used the anti-white buzz words of hate, racist, supremacist, and Nazi more so than even two anti-white activists it lobbed softballs to. Understanding the role the mass-media plays in not just covering but actually leading the crusade for an Aryan free world can no longer be hidden. If you choose to ignore it is willful and not due to ignorance.

There is no longer any un-bias when it comes to the interests of White folk anywhere in our Talmudic Infested Society of which ZOG is but the “legal” enforcement arm. Even here in the land where Richard Butler was bankrupted for a pro-White ideology and Randy Weaver’s wife and son were murdered for him trying to live free there is no place for us. General Clark, the tool used by Judah to destroy the fledgling Serbian awakening said there is no place in Europe (wonder why there is no mention of Africa or Asia?) for an ethnically homogenous country but it should be clear there is no place in the WORLD for white folk to live alone. For us to want to live alone and do our own work (not bring in a lot of cheap, compliant 3rd World slaves) and create and rear our own White children is being "supremacist", "hate-filled", "racist", and "Nazi".

Our 'Fuhrer'

2009-12-18T15:27:00.003-05:00

There is a lot made of the oath made by members of the German armed forces in the National Socialist era to Adolph Hitler personally. It is decried in the “free” West not only because of the lack of being subordinate to a legal document of some sort but also because Hitler is portrayed as the greatest monster of all time. I share the former concern in a general sense and in most times due to the fallibility and weakness of man. The latter concern is of course the result of who rules us and they rightly hate the man who defied them and raised his people (our people) up from their insidious clutches if only for a season.

The United States on the other hand has required the officers of its armed forces to swear an oath promising to serve the Constitution. Here is the oath sworn by officers in the U.S. Army:

I (insert name), having been appointed a (insert rank) in the U.S. Army under the conditions indicated in this document, do accept such appointment and do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter, so help me God.

An interesting thing about the oath is its broadness. It doesn’t say that orders they are given must be vetted as to their constitutionality. It says without caveat that “that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic”. In theory this should ensure that the military is a bulwark against the official branches of government failing in their duty to serve within Constitutional guidelines. Now anyone with a shred of intelligence and perception has long realized that the government of the United States (I refuse to call it my government) follows the Constitution in only the most trivial, pro-forma sort of way most especially due to the ascension of the Supreme Court to being a super legislature. The Legislative and Executive both fail to reign in the Court as well procure for themselves powers never granted either in the letter or spirit of the Constitution. Documenting this complete breakdown of the rule of law is not something I will further delve into here. There are many web sites – mostly of the right wing constitutionalist flavor – that can give you more details if you are new to this.

What I do wonder is how many officers of the U.S. military are both aware of their own governments complete failure to follow the Constitution as well as their DUTY to therefore defy it. Would they not then be “defending” the Constitution against a “domestic” enemy? Of course the answer is yes.

I have read a fair amount of commentary that describes the modern officer corps as being automatons in a moral sense. Not much different than the general population. The ones that do exhibit a small degree of moral clarity are weeded out. It’s ironic that they are very Germanic (at least as far as the caricature of WWII German officers goes) in this “I was only following orders” programming. I had occasion just a few years back to become close to members of a class of West Point graduates from the era between WWII and Vietnam. I was struck by several things about them that seemed pretty consistent. One, is that they were very honor bound especially to their classmates. Two, they were very stoic. Three, they were spiritually dead. The latter point requires some clarification and it may be a stretch given the short time I spent with them. As I would bring up any topic that was just slightly off the radar of trivial conversation they would politely redirect things. They just weren’t comfortable with it. By the way, at this time I was not yet fully awakened racially. I was more in the “Muslims are our number one enemy” camp, so nothing truly un-pc escaped my lips. They just weren’t a very inquisitive crowd. Then again that characterizes most people now and probably throughout history; sheeple, lemmings, etc. In the day when the U.S. Government was still under the constraints imposed by the Constitution this unimaginative, unthinking (I’m only referring to non-military issues here; they are very much competent in their core area) officer corps philosophy is not that dangerous. Since at least the time these officers were first commissioned the government has been extra-constitutional.

As I understand things from others and based on limited first hand experience with contemporary officers the situation is at least as bad now. Plus there is the issue of the mainstream poison they have internalized through their entire upbringings. What we have in the modern Amerikwan officer corps is a situation almost identical to that of the Nazi-era German one. Our officers do not defend and protect the Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic. That is absurd. They serve the Fuhrer – our Leader. Who is that? Who sets the rules? Who tells us who is naughty and nice, who is respectable and villainous? If you think it is President Obongo you haven't even graduated from real politics 101 yet.

Compare the potential case of most modern officers being asked to do something politically incorrect like escorting the 3rd World peoples who have invaded this country back home (very Constitutional) with them being ordered to wage war on a nation who is no threat to us (say Serbia) with no Declaration of War being made (doubly Unconstitutional). Is there any doubt which of these scenarios would create more conscientious objection and mutiny? Likewise is there any doubt as to which scenario would elicit sympathy towards the objector on the part of the mass media and which scorn?

So who is this Fuhrer? Find out who sets the tone of morality and more importantly why and you have the answer. It is so painfully obvious that only the internalization of their suicidal values or fear will prevent you from seeing it.

There are differences between Amerikwan and German officers. The latter were honest not hypocrites and most importantly the Fuhrer they served sought to use them for the elevation and the progress of Aryan Man (albeit very imperfectly) while the Amerikwan Fuhrer uses them for degradation and destruction.

One can only hope that there is a kernel of Aryan men within the modern U.S. Officer Corps who still have honor and the moral courage so lacking in the so-called “greatest generation”; the generation that mindlessly followed orders instead of reclaiming America when it was still much more possible. Short of a coup within the U.S. Armed forces there is no institutional solution or even help in sight for our people anywhere on the horizon. Until then they should revel in their service to our 'fuhrer' and put all the constitutional b.s. to rest.

Here We Go Again

2008-10-20T12:38:00.004-04:00

There are many white nationalist bloggers who are chiming in on the upcoming US presidential election in a way I can only scratch my head about. A certain number of these bloggers are taking a seat at the table of the shell game called The Lesser of Two Evils AGAIN. It’s not surprising that self-styled conservatives keep falling for that line but nationalists? Say it ain’t so!

Throughout history our people have acknowledged two distinct types of enemies who are the worst; the ones who receive the most contempt and the severest of punishment. These are the traitor and the spy. The more conventional enemy is the barbarian – the outsider. A folk are never truly defeated by the outsider but by those who destroy from within.

In the upcoming soviet-style one party election charade there is an outsider pitted against a traitor. Who should we white folk loath and hate? Who should we lift up in mockery and instill with fear? It should be as clear as the afternoon sun. Instead many nationalists are rallying to this creature; the traitor. Many argue the outsider might enact policies in further detriment to the beleaguered white folk of the USA in excess of the traitor. I am not convinced of this for starters but even assuming this, my follow up is “so what?” Let the outsider bring our weak and craven people more strong medicine showing how the real world works. Granted this will not wake most of our people up. Most will never awaken of their own free will; they will be led either by a deceitful enemy who desires their corruption and destruction or by a new holistic elite who want and need them as the head needs the body.

My speculation is that though most will stay in their blissful ignorance and depravity some more will awaken and – most importantly – more of these potential members of a new white cadre will emerge than if the traitor ascends. With the traitor a little less pain may be felt now - but given his repulsive, self-righteous war-mongering even that isn’t certain – but no needed reform will occur since “we” will be in power, at least if the last 40 years of “conservative” pseudo pro-whiteism is any indication. The traitor will do his master’s bidding like a good little lap dog, still be eviscerated by the master’s yappy entourage (aka the “mainstream” media), elicit sympathy from decent white folk, who in turn are repaid by the traitor with even more treachery.

Why shouldn’t we be repaid that way? We have earned no respect. As a joke most acknowledge politicians in our system are whores but in reality expect them to work for our interests. They serve their pimp and only him. We as the John are left physically and spiritually diseased and poorer all at the same time. The few exceptions are ignored or destroyed and even they must play by “the rules”. To earn respect we must start withholding support from all except friends and pay traitors in ways tradition has deemed fitting.

The outsider is a symptom. He can and will be defeated in due course IF we first defeat the traitor and the spy. The spy is not a perfect metaphor here in that at first glance the spy appears more like a traitor. It claims to be us when it serves its purposes and shuns us otherwise. He is the enemy though he does not declare his intentions and does not usually wear his “uniform”. Our traitors serve this spy. Until they pay a price for this collaboration we will get more of the same supposedly insane (they are very sane once one understands the real situation) policies.

If one is to go into the chute at all and give any respectability to the fraud destroying us there are alternatives to the traitor and the outsider. The traitor isn’t the lesser of two evils but the greater.

If even the discipline of withholding our support from the traitor is asking too much from many white nationalists then we are even worse off than I thought – which is bad enough.

Talmudvision in all its glory

2008-09-22T07:47:00.003-04:00

God only knows I try to avoid watching television but it is very hard to avoid it completely. It is such a purveyor of poison because of who runs it and what their agenda is that it would be well for all White folk to shun it. As currently constituted the bulk of programming is fit only for the Elite’s untermenschen; the commoditized labor units in their New World Order. On a flight recently on United Airlines an episode of the show “Monk” aired. I had heard of this show though it was the first time I had actually seen it. It managed in the brief span of thirty minutes to encapsulate perfectly the Loxism (hatred of Whites) of our masters. Maybe this particular episode is standard fare for the drooling crackers and other hominids who now dwell in what is still called the United States of America. Still it was about as ham-handed as one can get and not cross over into a parody of the very thing it was trying to promote. If we ever emerge from the mess we are in this episode should be an exhibit in the enemy’s Gallery of Death: Vapid “entertainment” as malignant destroyer.

The show is set in San Francisco, which is renowned for its depravity and having much of the refuse of the world seek it out as a haven for the white, tax paying brutes to subsidize in comfort and in ever increasing numbers. That didn’t stop the show from making a white father, with a white wife and more than the standard one child from being the villain. Okay, so far this is the norm; almost all villains are white heterosexuals especially whenever anything interracial occurs in an exact inversion of reality. We were at least spared the interracial angle in the crime itself here. What were our lords thinking to have refrained from pulling out of their box of tools this most blunt hammer of all? You’ll see that’s about the only tool they left unwielded.

After firmly establishing the White Male antagonist the next thing they did was make Monk, who though it would be a stretch to call him White in the sense of being an Aryan still clearly fills that role for the purposes of the MSM, spend the episode in worshipful supplication to a Nigerian marathon runner who is his lifelong, avowed hero: one who was humble, moral, courageous, wise, truthful, and genuine and a perfect foil to the white villain who was a murderer, adulterer, coward, hypocrite, and liar.

Oh they’re not done yet shoehorning in scorn for us Whites. The next thing is that the compulsive Monk inadvertently offends another of our superiors: a Negro of the kind that resides in America. This Negro gave Monk a tongue lashing for the “offense” and Monk groveled at his feet.

This latter encounter was witnessed by several white females who did as they are constantly reminded by our masters to do and sided with the Negro and treated Monk with disdain. One in particular gave Monk the evil eye in several encounters over the remainder of the show. Monk’s constant apologies and reinforcement of being a true believer in white hating dogmas were not enough. Shame on you Monk for giving offense to any of those who are up the food chain from healthy whites (everything else that walks on two feet). Even doing so by accident, like using the word “niggardly” to describe a cheapskate, is a heinous infraction only pardonable after much rehabilitation, if ever.

It may sound as if I am exaggerating but it was really this bad. Watch for yourself. The title has the word “marathon” in it. One could possibly argue that this episode was parody since it was so over the top but I don’t buy it. We are a pathetic, beaten people and our masters want to see how much humiliation they can dish out before they have to worry. It’s always more and, as of yet, there has been little sign of any manhood left to react to this poison which is not just an insult but - even worse - one of their many tools of genocide. Hopefully there is simmering just beneath the surface – that I have yet to see – a rage that is building and will one day loose a righteous retribution our people would have exacted in ages past if ever brought close to this level of degradation.

This anecdote is like one speck of sand in a desert of examples that I don’t have the temperament to any longer sit through. If you are still making excuses for this shit as a “mainstream” White Man when will you have had enough and wake up? Become an Aryan and defy this putrid monstrosity which is defiling and destroying us. Don’t expect much company since the true path is always narrowest and the least trod. But for once you will live free and true.

White Power

2008-09-04T08:46:00.002-04:00

It is a harsh title is it not? Something even we awakened White folk recoil – at least a little – from. It has taken me a while until I was ready to read this book penned by George Lincoln Rockwell in the 1960s. Rockwell himself elicits much disfavor amongst many White Nationalists even today, 41 years after he was assassinated. Why?

Because he was direct and he advocated action that would bring about real victory for our people. He was a bold man of action, as well as theatrical, but also a man of deep thought. That union: thought and action is what makes a man great since most men are one or the other or – even more likely – neither. Spengler described Goethe as his model-man: philosopher and politician. As much as I have read about Rockwell I would like to know if there was a greater man than him in America in the last 50 years.

Many of the older White Nationalists around today came out of the conservative tradition and look(ed) on rabble rousers like Rockwell with suspicion. (This is not without some merit as the enemy seems most inclined to use Agent Provocateurs of this variety.) Rockwell grew to detest this variety of “right winger” – which he also came out of – because it had proven ineffectual at best and treacherous at worst. 40 years of additional hindsight proves Rockwell all the more right. Rockwell’s criticism of Wallace-ism (from ~ 1966) perfectly describes what many Nationalists now say of Tom Tancredo and Pat Buchanan. Our learning curve must be shortened since we are running out of time.

White Power is the best book I have ever read on the current plight of the White Man in America. It is generally (though not totally) as applicable now as it was 40 years ago. Most of its principles are valid to non-American White Nationalists as well. Unlike the scholarly writings of Kevin MacDonald, which are footnoted to the point of being unreadable, Rockwell writes in a very colloquial style and uses the best metaphor I have yet seen describing the relationship between the successful Gentile society and the Jewish parasite which took it as its host. He uses the metaphor of a ship being intentionally wrecked by enemies from within without the knowledge of the ship’s organic crew. Some of the highlights of the book are…

Exposing the false dichotomy of communism vs. capitalism

Describing the revolting moral inversion and hypocrisy in the handling of the Kennedy Assassination

Seeing through the right wing / left wing charade

Revealing the many faces of Judah and dashing to bits the supposed inconsistencies in these facets

Warning against “conservative” crypto-racialism

Astute critique of Boasian (e.g. mainstream) environment-is-everything “anthropology”

The inevitable failure of playing by the enemy’s rules

Proposed action plan for winning

…And all of it is presented with wit, humor and clarity. Almost all WN bloggers speak of these things now but Rockwell pulled it all together and presented it publicly over 40 years ago much to the chagrin of conservative useful idiots like William F. Buckley. Unfortunately the bought traitors like Buckley and Robert Welch (John Birch Society), etc., skimmed off almost all the White angst and directed it into their kosher little cesspits where no harm could be done to our Masters.

This book has everything, everything except a wide readership. It is true that no revolutions come from the masses. The masses in America are now lining up in their chutes to either pull a lever for Obama or McCain as their masters have convinced them is their duty. No the masses will never initiate anything. But of the potential revolutionary cadre which is out there somewhere, a much greater number of them must read this book. It is free on the Internet.

It is still very relevant but has some of its value been lost with time? Yes. In Rockwell’s time there was still a vibrant element of White Manhood within the working classes that just needed to be led and a reformation was possible. Alas 40 years of indoctrination through the now much more rotten popular culture has taken a heavy toll spiritually. This in turn has led to/allowed 40 years of increasing miscegenation, out of control immigration, feminism, materialism, and faggotry which have taken their toll physically. The White Man of Rockwell’s time has been gelded to a degree and with a speed that must be unprecedented in history. The “Greatest Generation” truly was great from Judah’s perspective. There no longer can be a popular, legal, revolt – a la Germany in 1933 - in America. Judah has destroyed her and can rightly wallow in all the decay now commonplace.

A roadmap for political success can no longer be followed with certainty. We are now in an age of corporate retreat that is more like a rout. We now must withdraw our support – economically and spiritually – from this thing masquerading as the USA. It must die, unfortunately not directly as a result of our actions, but through it killing us and driving our dwindling remnant away. It is ZOG. It has been corrupted and perverted beyond repair. Self, family, and community is where we now must rebuild from; from the bottom up. And even these will be challenges of great difficulty. If we cannot reintegrate with our women and children they will be harvested by ZOG and sundered from us. What will bind us in this rebirth? It will ultimately be a faith of some sort or sorts. Whether it is akin to Christianity or Paganism or something new altogether is less important than that it must be some binding force for life and progress for our people. Blood forms the bricks of any structure but mortar holds it together.

George Lincoln Rockwell paid with his life to try and wake us up. Let us not let this great man die in vain. Awaken, organize, instruct and let us live to one day recapture ourselves and our destinies. The alternative is to slowly sink into an ever rising pit of mud.

Speciation – The NWO end-game?

2008-08-26T14:27:00.000-04:00

There is much discussion about the New World Order on the Internet but the term is usually not delved into. It is nebulous and this is not without value since it appears less a covert conspiracy than an evolving phenomenon that is heading always in one direction.

A huge blessing of the Internet is that it has freed a layer or two of people beneath that of the truly exceptional to the world as it is as opposed to the world as it in the interests of our masters to appear. Once one at least partially awakens to certain realities it is stunningly clear that there is this dichotomy of truth and fantasy due to the primacy of power politics. The masters CANNOT let a critical mass of thinkers unite behind a common theme in opposition to this situation for then a cadre to bring them down is a possibility. This is why “hate crimes” laws will easily trump the beleaguered piece of paper our forefathers mistakenly believed could endure in a world filled with a motivated and organized race of murderers and swindlers.

As this scenario continues to gather momentum I am struck by what I can’t help but think will be their final solution to the Goy problem. Their Talmud long ago was penned in actualization of a diabolical spirit that among other things declares those not in their tribe as cattle – literally. This manifest destiny of Judah to conquer the world as their playground has slowly but surely progressed. The 20th century was a coup for them of epic proportions. Based on how they got the best of the Goy to slaughter each other for their sole profit and entertainment I actually am starting to believe that we are cattle. What kind of idiots believe that we were right to destroy Germany in the mid-20th century because they were our enemies? Just about every American; even many so-called White Nationalist bloggers. So I can’t blame Judah for considering us sub-human. We shunned and murdered some of the greatest men nature could have blessed us with like Hitler and Rockwell; men who tried to wake us up when our chances of slaying this Beast were much more possible but as Christ long ago said, when we are shown light we instead prefer the darkness. I hope the trend changes but hundreds of years of history are all going their way.

What is this final solution? Is it not just this power bending to their will the current reality which defies it? And that is literally separating what is now referred to as humanity into not only two subspecies/breeds/races – a flagrant violation of the very PC dogma they have addled the minds of most Whites with – but two distinct species. How this will be achieved is another question that I have no idea about. But I have no doubt that the powers that rule us would like to do this and will attempt to do it.

Think about it. The ruination of Aryan Man through our mongrelization is the last major step towards Judah’s undisputed reign over this world. But once this is achieved it is only a reprieve from even the Mongrel-man evolving as a threat. But now once a significant gap is reached between the elite and their tools all the stops will be pulled out to maintain and increase this gap. Then as now Judah will extract the best of the Goyim as breeding stock to improve their still degenerate physical and spiritual traits. These Goyim will be destroyed as Aryans since half water and half dirt is just mud. The next tier of Goyim, then as now, will be left in circumstances where reproduction is minimized through feminism, materialism, and faggotry. The bottom tier, then and now, will be the most fecund and most prone to cross with “people of color”. Over time and with the help of all the technology money can buy the Master Race will not only distance itself from its fellow humans it will separate from them permanently – as man is now from livestock.

Once we are speciated they will breed, cull, and use their stock as suits their purposes: worker drones, medical and scientific test objects, sexual slaves, gladiators; the possibilities are endless. It will be the end of all except the Chosen Ones.

Seem implausible, impossible, just silly? Maybe. But the evidence is clear that the demonic force ruling us now and poised to control every corner of this planet would LIKE to do this.

Once this state is reached the “God” of Judah will be vindicated with a little help from his friends.

Presidential Rankings

2008-08-25T08:23:00.004-04:00

Here is an attempt to rank the U.S. Presidents in order of their faithfulness to the interests of our nation’s founder’s posterity; in other words OUR interests. What I especially focused on was what the man did or failed to do when the actions would have made the most difference. I have heard it said many times the George Bush (little shrub) is the worst president ever from the perspective of White people. I think that is balderdash. He is awful for sure but is constrained in the damage he can do both by his own limited capacity but mostly by the times we live in which have virtually assured the results we are getting. We are now in a freefall with no end in sight and our people are truly out of control at the macro political level. This is not said to breed despair as much as to hopefully inspire local, humble actions which is about all we can do for now. This powerlessness was not always the case.

Starting with Lincoln and accelerating with Wilson and FDR the collapse has progressed. When we reached the point of no return – that is the time after which no president could any longer right our course back towards being a White Republic – is certainly debatable, but it has clearly passed. Whether it was with FDR (my guess) or Eisenhower or possibly – at the latest – Nixon is a good question. . Jews are right to gloat as they are now wont to do: the United States of America is now not only finished as a White nation it is filled with so many poison pills as to absolutely prevent its reformation back in that direction. A new model can and must rise again but the USA is gone.

From FDR forward the only debate is the degree of damage that each did. For Reagan apologists consider the 1986 Race Replacement Acceleration Act. Do his tax breaks come close to neutralizing that? Yes the soviet flavor of judeo-communism was thwarted but it was only replaced with a more virulent strain of judeo-capitalism. I agree Reagan was the best Republican since Hoover but that ain’t saying much. He ultimately fell far short of how he sold himself.

If I were to rate the Presidents on despicability the order would be a little different. For White folks in recent years the most despicable of the men below are those who said they were one of us but then served the enemy; as bad as Wilson was I don’t consider him as treasonous as Eisenhower or Nixon. He was clearly deluded but there is a special place in Hell for those who knew better and sold us out – along with their forefathers, us, and all our potential descendants – with forethought. But I wasn’t trying to rank intent, just effect.

Below my ranking, Wikipedia's ranking, and my comments are provided. With more knowledge and wisdom I’m sure I’ll find a few who are misplaced.

My Rank-Wiki Rank Comments

1-4 Thomas Jefferson. Acquired huge tract of land without a drop of blood. Understood that agriculture was the backbone of our people. Opposed money-worshippers. Race realist not through conformance but through reason. Dealt with Barbary Pirates very effectively.

2-3 George Washington. A man of unchallenged integrity, courage, and humility. Tried to hold together such creative and opposed men as Jefferson and Hamilton into a coherent whole. Walked away from power when it was his to keep.

3-16 James Monroe. Monroe Doctrine institutionalized an Aryan ideal (expansion of White living space) that served us well. It has long since been perverted beyond recognition.

4-13 James Madison. Understood the depravity of Man and the need for checks and balances against our worst tendencies.

5-5 Theodore Roosevelt. An explicit white nationalist at a time when that was coming under attack. At least outwardly an opponent of homo economicus and America as the great money machine. Conservationist. Imperialistic tendencies and progressive at a time when being conservative still had value. Split the Republicans in 1912 allowing Wilson to win.

6-31 Calvin Coolidge. Screwed up little. Oversaw the last significant action of the American government in the interests of White folk: the Immigration Act of 1924.

7-17 Grover Cleveland. The last Democrat who was obedient to the Constitution.

8-26 Chester A. Arthur. Signed Chinese Exclusion Act into law and supported other eugenic immigration restrictions.

9-10 James K. Polk. Liberated the American SW from pathetic, mongrel Mexico

10-8 Andrew Jackson. Defied the money-changers but also elevated the power of the presidency for later tyrants - starting with Lincoln - to abuse.

11-23 Martin Van Buren. Neutral.

14-19 John Quincy Adams. Skilled diplomat. His post-presidential defense of the Armistad "mutineers" reflects an addled universalistic morality: the White Man's bane.

12-36 Millard Fillmore. Ran as a candidate of the nativist Know-Nothing party after being president.

13-40 Franklin Pierce. Copperhead. Avoided Civil War. Followed the Constitution. But enacted the Nebraska-Kansas Act which allowed slavery (and negritude) room to grow in the west.

15-20 William Howard Taft. Possessed a cool, conservative temperament which at that time was a virtue. Supported income tax amendment along with just about every one of our blind leaders.

16-11 John Adams. Driving force behind American Independence but possessed a prickly temperament more suited to being a lawyer than president.

17-34 Zachary Taylor. Insignificant.

18-30 Benjamin Harrison. Neutral.

19-41 James Buchanan. Avoided Civil War. Followed the Constitution.

20-39 Andrew Johnson. Fought against Redestruction.

21-42 Warren G. Harding. Graves aren't filled with the "accomplishments" of his term as with the Establishment's darlings. Tea-pot dome? Who gives a damn. It's funny that Harding is pilloried for something that doesn't mean squat today and lying war-mongers who ripped the heart out of the West like Lincoln, FDR, and Wilson are lionized.

22-33 James A. Garfield. Was his defiance of cronyism which led to his death good or bad for Whites?

23-35 John Tyler. Evicted from the Whig party.

24-38 William Henry Harrison. His inauguration proved fatal so who knows what he would have done. Too bad that wasn't the case which such infamous traitors as FDR.

25-18 William McKinley. Annexed brown lands of Puerto Rico, the Phillipines, Hawaii, and Guam subordinating nation to empire.

26-15 Ronald Reagan. Equal or better than every other President since Hoover. Homo economicus is the best model Conservatism holds up for White Manhood. Proved that even our victories are sterile. Amnesty of 86: an infamous act of racial treason, though he may have believed the lie about that being a one-time necessary evil.

27-27 Gerald Ford. Short term but still not short enough.

28-29 Herbert Hoover. Compared to his successor he looks great. Not compared to that animal he was pretty lame.

29-7 Harry S. Truman. Ended the Pacific War without tens of thousands of more dead whites in defiance of Jewry who would have rather dropped A-bombs on defeated Germany. Involved us in another imperial adventure - Korea. Became a crusader for the latest blight to strike White people's right of self-determination: Civil Rights.

30-24 Rutherford B. Hayes. Was sympathetic to the plight of God's precious and always persecuted darlings as they started to face ramifications for their latest nation wrecking adventure in Russia. Hayes helped make sure America would be the parasite's new host.

31-37 Ulysses Grant. An incompetent administrator which allowed the carpetbaggers and their pet apes free reign to further ravage the South. In peace forgot how he treated Jewry in war.

32-12 John F. Kennedy. Set into motion - thru life and death - the end stage of America.

33-25 George H. W. Bush. Another tool of Judah like all since Wilson. Invasion of Iraq. Champion of New World Order. Caved when one of Hymie's pets was beaten to keep it in line and sold out white cops.

34-21 Bill Clinton. Cheered the on-going genocide of the White Race. Destroyed another white nation's (Serbia) attempt at sovereignty in favor of the NWO. Raised the Judah's governmental involvement to new levels of overt power.

35-22 George W. Bush. A Wilsonian dolt with (fortunately) only half of Wilson's IQ, but there is only so much more damage that can be done to what is left of America and the West. A lobotomized Goy that his masters let off the leash on occasion to sow destruction when it is kosher.

36-27 Jimmy Carter. Gentle as a dove but unfortunately only about as wise as one also. Case study in not becoming IQ fetishists since his was supposedly high. Had a unique fusion of Wilson's naivety with Grant's management skills. The first in a perverse parade (later Willy and Shrub) of born-again xtians: all proud of their sychophancy and what they considered their own "ideals".

37-9 Dwight D. Eisenhower. Deported the wetbacks while it was still PC to do so. A robotic anti-nazi who did nothing (like a "good" conservative) to recapture what FDR had ravaged. Stabbed our last notable patriot who had political power, Joe McCarthy, squarely in the back. Attacked the South by using the military to integrate schools and the South abdicated.

38-1 Abraham Lincoln. Wanted to repatriate Africans. Redestruction would have probably been much more temperate had the fury of the southern haters not been loosed by his "martyrdom". Ravaged the nation and our most legitimate culture and created an empire. Even though he was spinning fantasy with his Gettysburg Address and showed, with his own views, not to believe most of it, it nonetheless became fodder for the post-war invader to remake America to serve its own purposes.

39-14 Lyndon B. Johnson. The first Texas idiot to demonstrate his virtue as an anti-white. Was too cynical to believe the hocum he pushed. A base and craven politician. Oversaw the institutional dismantling of White people's rights, sent our young men to die in jungles leading to a generational rift amongst our people. Could have slowed down the pace of Kennedy's liberalism. Instead he supercharged it.

40-32 Richard Nixon. Hated by the non-neocon element of Judah for some odd reason since he did their bidding in spite of knowing they were an enemy. A more mediocre variation on LBJ but with the ignominy of treachery since he sold himself as a patriot. A huge reaction to the excesses of LBJ could have been unleashed. Instead this respectable conservative diverted this anger to where his masters expected. Implemented the Great Society like a devoted commissar. He wasn't forgiven for his proforma, youthful red-baiting; hence the Watergate scandal. Was partially aware of the Jewish threat but failed to act out of cowardice.

41-2 Franklin D. Roosevelt. Bernard Baruch's water boy. Drove a stake straight thru the heart of America and the whole West. Before him there was a chance of restoration, after him our course was unalterable. An evil, duplicitous warmonger. The NWO's favorite whore. If pure evil and treason were being rated this creature would lap the field. It might not even be fair to call this thing a traitor since it was really a Rosenfeld in body and spirit.

42-6 Woodrow Wilson. Accelerated what Lincoln started and handed to FDR to finish. First known pawn of the New World Order. Delivered to Judah tens of thousands of our best young men both in betrayal of Germany and in support of future Israel. Oversaw the institutionalization of both the White Slave Act (aka the Income Tax) and the Great Kosher Money Tree (aka the Federal Reserve). League of Nations?, War to end all wars?, Safe for democracy? Actually believed that nonsense. Best personification of Aryan Man's precipitous decline. Supposedly awakened to his own mistakes in the end.

If all goes as expected we will soon we will under the overt dominion of a mongrel-savant of the NWO as opposed to the more usual white ones. I look forward to an end to the white stooges. We cannot judge Obama as the men above since he cannot be blamed for not looking out for us. Our own won’t even do that unless their masters tell them it is acceptable.

True leaders are courageous, wise, and moral free agents in the sense of defying the "spirit of their times" if that spirit is not in the interests of the progress of their people. Those attributes are anathema to the entity still referred to as the United States.

The King, the Counselor and the Prophet

2008-08-20T12:03:00.001-04:00

There is so much beauty and Aryan wisdom in the writings of J.R.R. Tolkein that it should be required reading by all White Nationalists. It is true that Tolkein disliked allegory but it is hard not to apply his works to our time. In fact by him overtly distancing his work from any contemporary issue he made its message all the more timeless. One recurrent theme in his works is decay; things are created in an original pristine state that is followed by inevitable general decline. I am not a fan of this particular aspect of Tolkein’s world though experience tends to reaffirm it. Still Tolkein reveals a desire as futile as it may seem to him to fight the decline and reform that which is sliding. In regards to this I want to emphasize one particular story of his I think is most relevant to us now.

Since I’ve awakened both to the rot that has inflicted Aryan Man and tried to understand its causes the revelations and learning have pointed in a consistent direction. All the filth and degeneracy always points to the same source. Oh, to be sure there are other factors involved. European Man is both blessed and cursed with an open, inquisitive spirit. We formulate ideologies to try and better order ourselves such that real progress is achieved. This spirit has served us well in our traditional historical environment: one of cold and scarcity; where cooperation was not only desirable but was required for survival. This spirit has also been our Achilles Heel, the kink in our armor which we have been blind to when we are not in our natural environment and are sharing our physical and intellectual space with foreign beings. For it was long ago espied by an outsider who has used it to slowly but surely inject his poison into us; to turn us to his service, and to that of his master.

Tolkein captured this situation perfectly in the relationship of Grima Wormtongue and King Theoden of Rohan in the Lord of the Rings. Theoden was noble and strong, daring and proud, and just as well. Yet he was not subtle, cunning or sly nor really wise as a king must be and was thus prone to one skilled in those areas. Sometime after (or it may have been before) his rise to kingship he took into his confidence Grima. Grima was all the things Theoden was not and at the start this was seemingly a positive relationship for Theoden and his nation. Tolkein says just that – that Grima initially provided wise council to Theoden.

Over time Grima’s councils directed Theoden to serve another power; a power not at all consonant with the spirit of Rohan. This shift in direction was gradual and deliberate and Theoden never saw the big picture until much later, after he had become a servant of all that the true spirit of his people loathed. Now it must be made clear that Grima himself was only a funnel through which the desires of Saruman were poured into the heart and mind of Theoden and over time Grima the subtle counselor became Wormtongue the corrupter. In turn Saruman had been twisted into a servant, though renegade, of Sauron who himself was a servant of the first corrupter – Morgoth. But I will use Wormtongue as the proxy for these powers to which he was but a slave.

There were nobles and officers true to Rohan who tried to warn the king of his and his nation’s slide into corruption but by that time the councils of Wormtongue had enslaved Theoden. Therefore these patriots were ignored if not imprisoned. Through Wormtongue, Theoden looked at natural friends as enemies or at best as undependable neutrals. He saw all Saruman’s intentions as honorable and in the best interests of Rohan. It got so bad that even when Theoden’s own son and many other of his people were killed in a sneak attack by Saruman’s orcs and mongrels he did not awaken in a fury of vengeance. That things were not much worse in Rohan by the time of the arrival a prophet of light is mostly due to the diligence and “treason” (at least as regards the councils of Wormtongue) of the faithful and vigorous remnant of Rohan as best seen in Prince Eomer, Theoden’s nephew.

This prophet is who awakened Rohan through the exorcism of he through whom Rohan was led. Gandalf’s arrival was vigorously contested by Wormtongue and for a time the sly adviser debated the wizard with the addled mind of the king unable to see the light through the fog. At this time Tolkein employs a tool we would do well to hearken to in trying to communicate our plight. Gandalf ignores the supposed “man” named Grima and rightly calls him a serpent whose words are nothing more than hisses.

One of my favorite lines from Gandalf is, “I have not come through fire and death to banter words with a witless worm. On your belly snake”. If that isn’t the exact quote, it is close. (Just as an aside there is a comparable classic moment in the climax of C.S. Lewis’ The Silver Chair.)

Gandalf knew words were important tools but they can be and in this case had been used to distort rather than edify and for a brief time had to be smashed to bits. In Lewis’ story the Silver Chair is literally smashed. In this case the chains on the spirit and the fog on the mind of Theoden were just as real but could only be destroyed by reaching in and pulling out the king from a self-imposed slavery once the well-spring of the enslavement had been disrupted.

Once Theoden reemerged as himself his nation returned as an organic healthy entity; with spirit, body, and soul working together to fulfill its destiny.

What does this mean to us? Who are the people filling these roles in the current production we are all actors in? My estimation after several years of being awakened is that King Theoden is the bewitched and AWOL leadership strata of European Man. Grima is the liberalized European commissariat without whose suicidal cooperation the enslavement, corruption, and genocide of Euro Man would not be possible. Wormtongue is the chattering creator and disseminator of that kosher zeitgeist known as political correctness, which is simply the latest ideological tool used by Jewry to achieve its objective of world domination. This is where the Mainstream Media, education establishment, and government bureaucracies all fall. Saruman represents the group of people from whom the agenda for the New World Order issues. It is Talmudic at the core and though many participants are not physically Jews they are nowhere men with no past and no future unless they are ultimately absorbed into that tribe. Think of the international banking houses, and groups who are the real guides of governmental and commercial policies and actions. Sauron/Morgoth is their lord. Whether one wants to call this entity “Satan” or something else is debatable but from the perspective of Aryan Man it is the Biblical equivalent of Satan.

I separate Grima from Wormtongue in that there is a part of liberalism that comes from the honest desire of Euro-Man to fix/save the world. Experience and even intuition reveals classical liberalism (as opposed to judeo-liberalism) as folly but it is not evil per se. But by design Grima was transformed and became the voice of Saruman - Wormtongue. Just as a exorcized Theoden had a desire to see Grima return uncorrupted as a servant of Rohan I would hope our deluded liberals will soon come home to their people, repent, and make amends for the damage they have done. Likewise there are
elements to liberalism that may be salvageable as expressions of European Man’s desire for real progress. Rohan is Euro-Man, adrift without an organic leadership strata; awesome with one.

Of all the pieces to this allegory the one that is the least certain to me is Theoden. Is there still a potential aristocracy for Euro-Man? If so from where will it emerge? No body lives long without a head in the midst of merciless foes. We have not had one for quite a while.

King – Counselor – Prophet. Is there a king left to rescue from corrupt counsels or has he been so tainted that he is permanently estranged from us in all but name? Or will he rise from among a new aristocracy? - an aristocracy wrought by the fires of an ongoing spiritual enslavement and physical genocide. Might the new story be that Theoden is overthrown by Eomer as the only means to save Rohan/us? I wish there were a Theoden but more and more it looks like a pipe dream.

2042

2008-08-14T08:01:00.001-04:00

Flashback…

“First, our cities will not be flooded with a million immigrants annually. Under the proposed bill, the present level of immigration remains substantially the same… Secondly, the ethnic mix of this country will not be upset…. Contrary to the charges in some quarters, [the bill] will not inundate America with immigrants from any one country or area, or the most populated and deprived nations of Africa and Asia….
“In the final analysis, the ethnic pattern of immigration under the proposed measure is not expected to change as sharply as the critics seem to think.”

…Senator Ted Kennedy during the debate surrounding the 1965 Immigration Reform Act which he co-sponsored

Fast Forward…

“White people will no longer make up a majority of Americans by 2042, according to new government projections. That's eight years sooner than previous estimates, made in 2004.

“The Census Bureau Thursday released population projections through 2050, based on rates for births, deaths and immigration. They are subject to big revisions, depending on immigration policy, cultural changes and natural or manmade disasters.
The U.S. has nearly 305 million people today. The population is projected to hit 400 million in 2039 and 439 million in 2050.”

…Associated Press report from August 13, 2008

If any other people group in the world were facing this latest demographic report the news stories would all be raising alarms and asking what could and would be done to reverse the trend. Google “2042 demographic white America” and see what you find in “our” mainstream media. See for yourself how concerned “our” media is with this. They can hardly contain their glee.

As a warning, the demographic news is really much worse than what is circulated for public consumption. This is for three reasons. One, the “White” classification is a catch all that includes elements completely hostile to the Nordic stock of Whites whose ancestors founded the United States. Two, of all the groups now contesting for America’s carrying capacity Whites are the weakest spiritually due to several generations of self-hating propaganda which the other groups have been intentionally spared. Three, our women are the most useful as administrators in the NWO economy making their independence from their men more workable.

So be prepared – unless there is a dramatic change in these underlying factors – for this projection to continue to get moved closer to the present.

Now if you are young white man and aren’t so sure about why you shouldn’t stand up for your people and honestly are perplexed as to why “our” media has their hostile attitude to our plight and really want the answer then you are on the verge of awakening as a real White Man. The answers are everywhere and easy to be found for now. Soon that may change if Ted Kennedy and his ilk get our last easily acquired access to the truth stopped with “hate crime” laws.

Westward Bound

2008-07-31T22:54:00.002-04:00

It’s been a while since I’ve written anything here. Between being both at a loss for what to say regarding America’s/The West’s continued decay and preparing to move from Virginia to Idaho my always sporadic entries have become nonexistent. But now the move is mostly over and I wanted to catch up and share some thoughts.

Northern Virginia had been my inherited home since my mom moved there (from Texas) while I was still in high school back in 1979. So for 29 years it was my little corner of the world. I finished high school, college (albeit on an extended plan), entered the workforce, became a property owner, met my wife, and have been blessed with three children here so it was in me/us and we with it. I also witnessed first hand the dispossession of the posterity of its creators by our masters. My graduating class in high school in 1981 was easily 90% White. Now that same school is maybe 50% White. The elementary school my girls were just pulled out of was maybe 25% White. Even that’s too many for our masters who look at Aryans the way Phil Sheridan looked at Indians. And the numbers are not the worst part. They are merely the symptom of a seemingly terminal spiritual disease.

I was unable to sell two of our properties in the area due to an ongoing collapse in property values so I can’t yet completely leave it behind. I’ll have to be a landlord until things turn around enough to sell. When that will be is a good question. That the house next door is home to an indeterminate amount of Central American mystery meat is doubtless a factor as well. I'm leaving behind at least one neighbor who is an honorable Aryan who's young adult son is possibly waking up to our plight. They were two of the few real life people I met who ever seemed interested in the story behind the story.

The trip cross country was mostly enjoyable. First off we stopped in Niagara Falls. We went out of our way to go there since neither my wife nor I had been. This stop was the biggest disappointment of all. Not the natural beauty which is awesome and uplifting. There were two things that ruined the experience. The first is that Niagara Falls, NY has allowed little bush-league tour groups to set up shop in the middle of town and unless you know this you will pay triple the price for the actual events for the ‘pleasure’ of these shysters shuttling you around town in their little busses spending half your time waiting for the slowest members of the group. So if you go to Niagara Falls, do NOT pay for any tour package. Go to the stops yourself for a fraction of the price and at whatever pace you choose. The second is that Niagara Falls is like New Calcutta. There are Asian Indians everywhere. Every other restaurant and every other visitor smells of the fusion of Cumin and BO and speaks like Gunga Din. They seem to have this strange water fetish as most probably already know as with the River Ganges. It seems to be for spiritual “cleansing” but not physical; my wife noted how three consecutive of their females didn’t wash their hands after using the rest room. Given what America now is they probably all have a piece of paper saying they are American. Of course none of them is coupled with a mongoloid or a Mestizo or a Negro with mongrels in tow. That’s the sole domain of those of us crackers who aren’t queer.

Fortunately most of the rest of the trip was edifying from an Aryan perspective. There were a few nauseating sites the rest of the trip. Noteworthy was the occasional White Woman in a rest stop who looked attractive but was in the arms of a Negro and was pushing around a wooly-headed little mulatto. She just followed all the leads of our sick culture and revolted against all her healthy instincts to end in that state. If we ever recover all the mongrels will have to be cast out or destroyed. Seem harsh? Well, they are all tools of our masters’ plan to destroy us. Do they give a shit about you as a carrier of life and progress? We can either be nice and die (or worse - end up permanently distorted) or be firm and live the full life that potentially awaits us. Payment cannot be avoided.

The next stop of note was in South Dakota. It is a beautiful state, with both diverse geography and topography and a largely untainted (from my small observation) Aryan population. I encountered a few Mennonite families and chatted a little with the husbands. They are characteristic of many of the best of our people; industrious, humble, communitarian, energetic and they were all physically well proportioned: in height, weight, and structure. They also exhibited the other characteristic of our people which has gotten helped get us in our current state – expected universal reciprocity. They are gentle as lambs but they do not appear as wise as serpents – at least not as regards the malign intents of our masters. They seem very protective of their beliefs but not of their genetic endowment. How they would fare if they were specifically targeted for destruction is a good question but I am skeptical. For now ZOG is busy ruining the still more numerous mainstream Whites so some of the dropouts (not all – note the Mormon Fundamentalists) are under the radar. I hope they can wake up to this without losing the best of themselves. Maybe they are savvier than I give them credit. If anything will save them – as Aryan people - from ZOG it will be their religious beliefs since that sets them apart and makes them close knit. Very few non-Aryans have the pioneer qualities it takes to be self-sufficient farmers and ranchers so this is an important though seemingly unintended firewall against miscegenation.

The Badlands, the Black Hills and Yellowstone were all as beautiful as expected. Mount Rushmore is especially worthy of seeing. Even if you hate Lincoln seeing the vision and implementation of such Aryan art is breath taking. The American Federal Government even deserves credit for the infrastructure they have put in around it. Almost all the other Americans encountered were decent and friendly. There were lots of Chinese at Yellowstone. They are on the ascent. Hopefully they all go back home when their visit is over.

I barely survived the behavior of my kids. It must have been half of the trip that one of them was having a tantrum. Higher doses of Talmudvision (the CD variety) would have pacified them but we only allowed a little of it and that was more benign shows like Andy Griffith. We arrived in western Montana after seven days and over three thousand miles right on Fire Cracker Day. Since then we have been lining up a temporary abode in northern Idaho to hold us until we can build a custom home further north on some acreage we bought a couple years back.

Even though my wife has not been agreeable to my racial awakening I am still happy to be away from ZOG’s imperial headquarters. The life there was getting worse every year and Whites are nowhere close to yet standing up to their destruction. As best I can tell they aren’t ready in the Pacific Northwest either but it is a place where a resistance may arise and if it does has the greater chance of success. For those either trapped in or defiantly staying in areas where Whites have largely been cleansed I hope for the best for you. We do need to carve out a nation within an empire but how to do it is not something I yet see.

I wish I had more things to say and there were others sharing ideas about truly constructive action but I must admit being at a loss right now. We must persevere and carry the torch since this generation won’t see the light. A high price must be paid for generations of failure and cowardice.

The Clintons

2008-04-28T08:05:00.002-04:00

Now that the Left/”Progressive”/”Liberal”/Democratic establishment has their panties in a ruffle over Hillary and Bill’s reluctance to bow out of the Democratic party’s primary a little reflection is in order. It’s funny that this same clique of boobs had absolutely no problem when the Clinton’s narcissism was only ruining the dwindling remnant of traditional America. (Of course the reason they had no problem with it is because this ruination was/is intentional and the Clintons were very effective in its execution.) Now that it is their precious rainbow coalition that is being exposed for the fraud that it is they want Hillary and Bill to get back in line like all the other good little crackers that are grist for the mill of progress. Thank God H&B have the integrity (in their own special kind of way) to just be themselves here. Don’t they realize that White folk are supposed to be used and then discarded? How dare they not conform! I know this little rebellion will be short lived but you gotta love it while it lasts. More Whites on the Left might finally wake up and see the reality of the one way street of race in the Jew-blighted States of America: a wonderful multicultural paradise as long as Whites surrender, turn the other cheek, self immolate, work and give but a Third Reich in-the-making if Whites come as equals to the political table.

What do I expect to come of this in the next few years? Absolutely nothing. Whites are still too narcotized by the spiritual poison of our zeitgeist and too comfortable playing remora to the New World Order’s shark. It will take others to save us unfortunately: whether it be Jewry’s own chutzpah, or some foreign power’s unwillingness to bow to this monstrosity we are trapped in.

In the meantime we (White Nationalists) can only cheer every new crack that is revealed within the JSA and hope the fissures keep growing to the point a critical mass of Aryans can grow out of the toxic waste. Based on our enemy’s unprecedented success (which the Clintons contributed to handsomely) in lowering White birthrates, encouraging miscegenation, and having brown skins fill in the carrying capacity we have built and maintain it is a race against time.

Here’s to the Clintons. May they always be themselves.

A Government Hat Trick

2007-10-24T12:09:00.001-04:00

In the last few days I’ve been exposed to three examples of why I have come to strongly dislike the governmental entity we are under the heel of. Fortunately I have not had to deal with these things directly – my wife has – as I do not have the patience for them, but just hearing about them makes me irate.

The first example follows in the wake of my father-in-law’s death. It is the whole business of estate management and the government. Having to hire lawyers to analyze and create appropriate documents to transition assets and liabilities from the deceased to beneficiaries is understandable. It is important to show clearly who is newly responsible for things with the passing of the original person. It’s a sad but true part of death. What is not understandable is the filthy claw of government being extended to take a chunk of the wealth from the already difficult situation. It goes without saying that a spouse losing a loved one is tough emotionally and physically; the latter is often more important and overlooked. Not all folks sit on their cans all day watching Talmudvision and only getting up to get their government checks or to drive to the store to spend it. Some are very active: working their property, helping their neighbors in their trades, hunting, fishing, etc. Leisure may be a part of the equation but the main characteristic is healthy vigor. Remove one spouse from that sort of relationship and the other is greatly affected. Having to deal with a death tax is one more, and a profoundly unnecessary and immoral one at that, piece to this struggle.

The second is the IRS. It has inaccurately sent us statements of additional moneys we supposedly owe them and in spite of all reasonable efforts to instruct them that yes, two plus two does equal four, they keep saying we have to prove this. For now I’ll ignore the ridiculous tax burden they “legally” assess and only focus on this explicit malfeasance. Literally we/you are guilty until proven innocent. To who and how this innocence must be proved is another frustration. Prove it to Lamika and she passes it to DeShaun; prove it to DeShaun and he passes it to Mrs. Wong; prove it to Mrs. Wong and she passes it to… Finally get them to admit their mistake on the principal (base amount) and then they won’t remove the interest. Have any kind of modest complication and Lamika’s brilliant analytic abilities are stretched to the breaking point. She has to hand it off to the “Schedule Expert”. This “Expert” in turn knows less about the schedule than my wife using Tax Cut. When in doubt pass it on to someone else and make the tax-paying cattle spend hours more on hold. Every mistake they make costs us lots of time and frustration if not money and they are immune (for now) from any consequences. One other funny part to this is that for the year in question I was unemployed for 4 months at one stretch and we are being penalized by these buffoons for not filing taxes then. I think it’s kinda funny to explain, “No Mrs. Wong you don’t pay taxes on non-existent income”. Funny until you realize they still don’t get it or they get it and won’t admit it because it is fun to treat the serfs like shit. The blogger Fred Reed is right about living in Mexico when it comes to the IRS; it’s better to pay an occasional bribe to crooked cops than to live under the thumb of a racket with just enough Aryan efficiency to tax and regulate but not the Aryan spirit to use it for real good. I really hope one day these tax bureaucrats are tarred and feathered as our fathers of old would have done.

The third is our medical system. It is true that it is not explicitly under the government but given that they regulate so many areas they shouldn’t (e.g. freedom of association) and given they are hopelessly intertwined via Medicare and Medicaid I lump them together. My son recently fell and cut his head. Unfortunately my wife took him to one of these emergency clinics. After waiting for an hour, he got the equivalent of a butterfly plastic bandage (clear stitches) applied which took less than 10 minutes of a doctor’s time. We have insurance but it has a very high deductible. My wife found out from the receptionist while waiting that for the uninsured the maximum for the visit was going to cost $175 but the clinic was going to bill them directly and we would deal with them. We figured the bill that would filter through to us from the insurance company would be a maximum of $175. Makes sense right? You don’t understand this system then. The bill we ultimately got came in two parts and totaled $600! Now the insurance company says we must deal with the clinic and the clinic says the opposite. $175 would have been outrageous for a damned band-aid but at least we knew that up front and would have paid it. How far will these shysters push enough of us until there are consequences? For those of you in corporate or government jobs you are insulated from the worst aspects of this system. I don’t know what a good solution is but I know for sure that the huge infusion of government subsidies has greatly inflated the price for those middle and lower middle-class folk caught in the middle.

Just three small examples of interactions with our “system” in just a few day stretch. The pot be a smolderin.

The Commute

2007-08-22T15:54:00.000-04:00

The following is a drive from my house in the northern Virginia suburbs of Washington, DC to work but it could be one of many similar spots across the Kwa in this age of transition...

Back out of the driveway in the quiet suburban neighborhood in mid-August. Leaves are still full on the maple, oak, chestnut, poplar, and ash trees though they are starting to brown and fall due to the dry summer. Wave hello to the neighbor on the right, a naval officer and his Asian wife; I like them both as individuals. He’s a conventional right-wing patriot, not at all agreeable to Bush’s amnesty but still a believer in the propositional America we’ve been given. Believes our greatest threat is Islam and best friend is Israel. My occasional challenges have not caused us strain. He is a decent fellow and a good neighbor.

On the other side are Somali tenants: a husband, wife and seven children ranging in age from late teens to fivish. They are not bad neighbors in the typical sense that is thought of. Islam seems to be giving them some semblance of discipline. The females all wear robes and head scarves. The modesty is becoming. Their younger children sometimes play with our kids. I have never spoken to the adults. We occasionally exchange waves.

Behind them (on the parallel street) are Peruvian newcomers. They fill the stereotype of the obnoxious Mestizo to a tee; loud music blaring at all hours forcing us to close our windows even when the weather is nice, when we yield to the base desire of wanting to sleep. Have called the cops thinking they’d get the message but that was expecting too much.

Drive down my street. The next house on the left has higher Latinos in the sense of being more Euro in both appearance and demeanor than their more prevalent cousins. Their daughter often plays with ours.

Walking down the middle of the street is some of the brood of pickaninnies imported by the U.S. Federal Government at our expense to a house at the end of the street. They slowly move out of the way and stare blankly as I dare to pass. Their presence in the street is ubiquitous; going to and from either the school to learn how superior they are to the White slaves who work day and night to feed, house, clothe, and entertain them or to 7-11 for their well earned sustenance. The sidewalk is too off-putting for them. 400 years of slavery and all. I believe I have heard that seven of the precious lil’uns occupy that house with their mammy. Some of the local White women have tried to be adult figures in their lives by taking them to the pool or otherwise watching them. The older “youths” or their friends often speed by with window rattling noise emanating from their SUV’s. What joy.

Further down is an older White couple still sporting signs for the GOP during every election cycle. One year before I woke up I went to the local school to hand out ballots for that racket.

Next to them is another Latino dwelling. The patriarch runs a towing business and cars overflow from all the residents. They have fixed up the house pretty nice. From what I hear they don’t get along with their gringo republican neighbors.

The rest of the drive out of the neighborhood includes some externally healthy White households. Most of the children in these cases are teenagers. Whites with young children are few; maybe one house out of twenty. Latinos abound and to their credit, most are industrious. Once their children are indoctrinated by ZOG that will change. By then we’ll have long said “hasta la vista baby”.

Heading down the major local road towards the Capital Parking Lot (aka the Beltway) the demographics hardly change either on the sidewalks, the busses or the cars. Latinos are everywhere. Asians aren’t far behind. Africans, home grown and imported, follow. Whites have been blown away. Driving through Annandale on Little River Turnpike can’t be much different than Tijuana. The McDonalds down near the Beltway doubles as a rent-a-spic though I doubt they get a cut of all that “cheap” labor. Then again no one does. I got no help from ZOG when my son was born but I’m sure all the wondrous “minorities” crowding us out did. No bother, I’m told they are enriching us.

Finally on the Beltway. Yes, it’s slow but I’m not on it for long. On I-66 West the traffic lightens and the speed limit is no longer posted as a mockery. Oh great, there’s a cop. Here to catch immigrant invaders? Going to stop a burglary, rape, or murder? Oh, it’s a speed trap. New $1,000 fines for driving too fast. Sam Francis so rightly called the hell of modern America an Anarcho-Tyranny. So true.

Ah, made it to work. And to think I get to keep almost 70 cents on the dollar. What a country.

Our Situation

2007-08-16T08:43:00.001-04:00

As a teenager living in Texas in the 1970s I loved war-gaming, especially of the WWII era. One of my favorites was one by Avalon Hill called Third Reich; a strategic level simulation of the European Theater of the war. From even an earlier age I developed an affinity for the German side in that war. It was all emotional at that time but I saw, even as a child that the Germans stood for something and some jealous bullies wanted to take it away. This sympathy was in spite of the propaganda that attempted to demonize Germany and Hitler. As a matter of fact the fairly ham-fisted caricatures of Germany in documentaries like the World at War were lost on me at a young age and all I saw was pride, and confidence, and beauty that a people, our people, had in themselves and their place in the world, past, present, and future. In my childish innocence and naivety I sensed that I was of them and not of the side that some words said I was supposed to be on. My war-gaming friend almost always took the Allied side even though he was ethnically Scandinavian, while I was of British (more distantly Germanic) and took the German side. By the way, he was a better player than I and almost always won but I did persevere. There was something phony I sensed in the alliance of Anglo-America and the Soviet Union and in its motivations that were not apparent on the German side. I did not understand until far later in life that my childish instincts were true and I am now a great admirer of the German cause not just instinctively but intellectually. I also now understand that that was not a war between the Axis and the Allies as much as it was a war between Jewry and the White Race; between darkness and light. America, Britain, and Russia – looked at as nations - were just pawns used against their/our own interests.

I bring all this up as a backdrop for assessing the conflict we are now in as a war-gamer must assess things. What are we up against? What are our prospects? What can we do? Where should we attack? Where defend? Where advance? Where retreat? Should the emphasis be on spending now (on weaponry/infrastructure) or saving for the future (research)? On guns or butter? The questions and their answers are critical for success in any conflict.

The first question that must be answered is who are we? This should not be assumed since deception is the unchallenged domain of our enemy. Saying that “we” are white people doesn’t go far enough. We must know both who we are and who is not us. The answer to who we are is not necessarily the same for all White folk. I will answer it from the perspective of the descendants of the founders of America: Anglo-Saxon and Celtic people with decreasing loyalties in direct relation to genetic distance. We can be broadly described as Northwest-European, Germanic, and/or Nordic without the loss of cohesion inherent with too broad an identity. More distant Whites like conventional Spaniards, Italians, and Slavs may or may not be considered us as well. It is critical that our umbrella not be too large for if it is we will lose cohesion. Having a motivated core is much more important than raw numbers. The best test to confirm whether we answered this question right is by asking another question… Will all the people in our group fight for our group. Do they know they are us? Clearly the blanket of Caucasian is too broad. Non-Jew Semites are not us. Neither are any other of the Supra-Saharan Africans often classified as Caucasian. Jews are only us if a parasite can be primary over its host. This is happening slowly but surely thru the intermarriage of the old Gentile elite with Jewry but as much as that has weakened Aryans and muddied the waters with the confusion of thinking our leadership represents us, it has not been completed. There is still an ever decreasing remnant of Aryan from whom to instigate a revival.

The second question is what is our situation currently? When I look at what the state of the White Race is today, primarily in the United States, I almost think our situation is hopeless. I have to fight this superficial impression because looking at a scenario at a point in time can be very misleading. Things are bad, very bad, right now but underlying conditions will often change suddenly. Let me start with the good news.

Using the 2000 Census, of an “official” population of 281M, “Whites” total 211M. This is 75% of the total. When healthy Whites can organize and fight far greater opponents. We have a capacity to create a society from raw earth that is unrivalled due to our unique pioneering quality.

The bad news is… just about everything else. First off the population number cannot be looked at statically but by where it is going in relation to the competition. The number of children per woman (Total Fertility Rate or TFR) of “real” Whites compared to “people of color” in a given geography is what really matters. There are no official statistics on TFR for 2000 but some estimates have the non-Hispanic (a completely unnecessary and demeaning prefix) White TFR at about 1.5; African-Americans around 2.5; Hispanics around 3. That Whites are less fertile than non-Whites (except perhaps East Asians) in a given environment is common knowledge and has been intellectualized by Rushton with his r/K factor dichotomy.

75% sounds good until you realize that “White” is a bit of a demographic classification catch-all. It is used very loosely, so loosely, that the amalgamation of “Whites” that exist in America now could never form a unified society. It includes Hispanics who aren’t black, Turks, Arabs, and Jews, in addition to Euros. Now there are some issues even with Euros in the sense that Slavs and many Southern Europeans have had their blood diluted significantly more than Germanics. How many of the 75% are still White after subtracting the Asiatic and Mestizo “Whites” is unclear but I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s around 15%. This is because Jews are considered around 2% (but not by the Census since God’s Chosen are always lumped in where they cannot be officially measured) which clearly is an understatement since half Jews and quarter Jews are not technically Jewish but are Philo-Semitic to an obscene degree since that is the best career move in the West these days. Also the 12.5% of the official Hispanic population is on top of their racial identification which is doubtless mostly White if a perusal of crime categorization is any measure. So 4% (my guess of Jews, half Jews, quarter Jews) + 12% (Meztisos) + 1% (Other) equals 15%. The math is very rough here but I bet it is close. If anything Whites are probably less than 60% as of 2000. Of course its 2007 now and things have only gotten worse and the illegals aren’t even in the counts.

But the numbers aren’t the worst news. The worst news is spiritual. We Whites don’t even care anymore about ourselves as a group. We have been catechized for so long, by the society we are cursed to live within, to loath ourselves that we do loath ourselves. White children that have managed to be born at all by being fated through the snares of their parent’s careers, and materialism are themselves confronted with every conceivable variation of life-destroying poison: summarized by narcissism and inverted idealism.

The unbalanced love of self (narcissism) is coddled to a degree completely at odds with sustainable - much less progressive - living. It leads to perpetual juvenility within our Fabian Socialistic structure that subsidizes the weak at the expense of the strong. Women that want to abandon men and children in the pursuit of “career”? No problem. Not only will you have rent-a-men (the military, cops, etc.) to protect you but you will be given preference in the pursuit of your career over men who a holistic woman has joined with in a nuclear family. Men who never want to be burdened as men but want to stay little boys and who go even further into the perverse pit of faggotry are also exalted. Narcissistic men and women are cloven from any roots; from love of anything greater than themselves; from the past and the future. All they have is the empty now.

Whites, especially, are both blessed and cursed with a tendency towards idealism. It can be a blessing when the elite from whence the ideologies spring desire the best for their people. When the elite are foreign and desire the destruction of the people they oversee the ideology is used as a means to so addle the minds of the masses that they pound their chests with pride at their degeneracy, thinking it virtuous. Whatever else the ideas may spawn they cause its adherents to regress by intent. The masses then continue to be befuddled by the causes of the symptoms of a disease they cannot see, since it comes from within. The fruit of Judeo-Liberalism including equalitarianism, cosmopolitanism, consumerism, feminism, anti-racism, Lysenkoism, etc., are unquestioned ideals to be promoted when they lead axiomatically to the very degeneracy any with eyes sees. The foreign elite have well learned: why kill your enemy when you can not only get them to kill themselves but kill themselves, and all they sprang from, with passion? The whole West is the Treblinka Judah marketed but never was. Our inhalation won’t kill lice but our very souls and when death follows it is an escape from a hell we have not only tolerated but created.

The third question is what can/should be done about it?

There are two main views on this. One is to fight it through reformation. The other is to let it, even encourage it to, die. Most of the internet forums I visit gravitate towards the latter, if not explicitly, then by inference. Still, there is a good deal of cross-over. We must be flexible and adaptable and regularly reassess the desirability of a reformed vs. destroyed institution. Much recent discussion has revolved around the candidacy of Ron Paul for President of the US. Some argue that he is much better than any of the other choices from the perspective of Euro EGI (ethnic genetic interests) while others argue he does not pass the threshold of acceptability since he would/does explicitly argue against “racism”. I am presently persuaded against supporting Paul though my point in this is emphasizing constructive debate occurring within WN (White Nationalist) circles about what should be done about our current situation. Voting in a presidential election can be both an act of reformation and an act of destruction. If Paul somehow won and was able to act upon his goal of dismantling the Federal Reserve it would be a reformation of out Government through the destruction of its usurious money lender. This scenario is completely unacceptable to the plutocracy lording over us making it impossible. Much less radical attempts at reformation, playing within the system’s own rules and its stacked deck, are routinely shot down so the ballot box is a very doubtful impetus for change. Even denying illegal aliens the fruits of the taxpayer is not acceptable to the Plutarch’s lawyers (aka judges). Our government is a symptom but it’s not to say there aren’t some things we can do to use it for our own ends. I am persuaded that the best way to use Government is to abuse it. Elect Barrack Obama as President; collect welfare; support quotas and set-asides; oppose English-only. It is true these are all revolting choices (maybe not the last one) but what better does our foreign occupational government deserve? “It” is not “us” so maybe it should be stretched to the breaking point through a form of dropping out. The ways of dealing with outside things is debatable.

What is not debatable is what must happen within us. We must grow and develop the personal and collective character to live as our ancestors and to go beyond that; to learn from their mistakes and improve. If we don’t become strong again and soon we will have no future except to add a little flavor to the New World Order’s mass-man. Three things I see as being foundational to this are:

1. A revival of our corporate identity as a distinct and special people
2. Reassertion of man as lord over women and children
3. Attention to breeding/eugenics

The first provides the foundation on which we build: it is our past. The second provides the operational framework for living holistically: it is the present. The third allows for true progress: it is our future. Of all these things the foundation is the second one. The first is showing signs of life via the Internet because white men are starting to be men again. But, if all the bloggers aren’t also translating their activism into personal acts as husbands and fathers we are really gaining nothing.

I want to focus on the second and third points for now since the first gets plenty of attention in the WN blogosphere. Just as any healthy society is an organism; it is made up of units that are also organisms. The family unit is the building block of all higher life since it makes the higher life even possible. If there is a better structure for it than man as provider, protector, and spiritual leader, and woman as integrator and nurturer I am unaware of it. It worked for millennia and will again once all its pieces are returned to their proper function. From a young age our girls must be socialized into their role as mothers and in the arts and skills consistent with that role. As should be obvious this is completely at odds with the social paradigm currently oppressing us. These factors must be eliminated, controlled, or minimized by parents to the highest degree possible. It can and must be done so that the current situation can be reversed. The television has got to be the main source of the enemy’s schemes. Its content is a toxin worse to our minds than even our rotten industrial “food” system is to our bodies. Second is the schools. Public or private they bow down to Molech and elevate his altar to the center of the universe. Leech the spiritual poison out of your children regularly as they return from these worship services. Better yet homeschool them. Better still is the small community Euro-friendly private/homeschooling arrangement. For now this is hard since the numbers of motivated WNists in a given locale is more than likely very low. The Amish are a model to borrow from in this area. Keep girls active in the affairs of the home, modeling their mother since idle hands are the devils workshop. When she reaches the age of transitioning from girlhood to womanhood make it a special and solemn occasion that she, and all who witness it, will remember. Remind her of the beauty of modesty and soft-spokenness.

Even harder is the socialization of boys since it is a setting-apart maturation, clashing with the childish and feminine, belonging and safety. I am not using “childish and feminine” as derogatory here since they are perfectly natural and desirable for children and women. Men must deal in the realm of life and death; be it protecting the home, protecting the community, or protecting the nation. This is not an area for sentimentalism or weakness. It is often kill or die. Men fill that role or the people disappear. Boys must be socialized to fill it. Men must learn self-control through arts emphasizing discipline be they physical or mental. Eastern martial arts is a good alternative readily available. As with girls keep them away from the boob tube as much as possible. What would really be nice is if Aryans started taking their god of death and ritually destroyed it (and remembered the date on the calendar) akin to Judah’s ritual of remembering why gentiles are only fit for the abattoir; Passover, Purim, etc. Fathers must apprentice their sons in their line of work so that work is real to the boys and not virtual. The work must be honorable and productive and not at odds with the greater interests of the community. A Coming of Age ritual is essential to reestablish amongst Euros, taking particular forms in different areas of our people such that it has wider significance and is shared between the father and son and other men who are kith and kin.

Regardless of the dire circumstances we face we must reclaim our children as our own. They can no longer be sacrifices to the false god ruling this world.

When it comes to breeding by intent and with purpose it is amazing that this even has to be raised. You can look anywhere throughout the Kwa and see evidence of animal husbandry emphasizing selective breeding: horses, cattle, dogs, cats to name just a few. Yet due to the ideology of anti-racism our master’s have shackled on us human selective breeding is taboo. Jews don’t practice what they preach since to them (as stated in their holy book) they are the jewel in “God’s” eye while we are cattle. Aryans need to understand this. The “universality” of kosher ideology is reserved for the Goyim. Any practice of political correctness by the Master Race is by their weaker members who they are glad to cull anyway. With all that in mind Jews have very different standards of excellence than do Aryans both aesthetically and functionally making their specific selection criteria only partly applicable to us. They are a parasitic race unable and unwilling to function in a vertically integrated fashion so they have cultivated cunning and deceit as their top characters to allow them rule over their objects.

We need to return to a holistic view on genetics; trying as best we can to select mates for ourselves and our children who will in greater probability produce children of equal or better quality. What are the criteria for quality? Physical, mental, and spiritual: the three components forming the foundation of a healthy community and nation. Distorted body types are to be avoided especially related to the carrying of excessive weight as well as to misshapen features. Physical strength and stamina are important. Vigor and straightforward smarts are very important though a hyper-intelligent schemer is less likely to produce or rear quality. A love of life is a sign of spiritual health. Still, our Matrix is producing nihilism that is almost healthy since who wouldn’t want this hell destroyed. It is hard to evaluate spiritual health in our current situation. It must be done with a high level caution. A pretty face should be way down the list if it doesn’t fit with all the other criteria, though they usually run hand in hand. Asian Indians still follow eugenic principles in the selection of mates for their children. In the longer term we need to create societal models that naturally promote progressive breeding by returning to many of our old ways. Impersonal wealth transfers (welfare) to the mentally and physically weak must end, sterilization or execution of degenerates must resume. Wars pulling our best young men out of the pool to be replaced by their inferiors must end. War won’t end but who is killed in them can change. If Britain were still ruled by the British in 1916 they would not have sent their flower to be mowed down at the Somme but their dregs. Then again if real Britons ruled there would have been no Great War at all.

In other words almost everything in our current society must be inverted.

The fourth question that could be asked though I won’t delve into it is “why does it matter whether we survive at all?” I won’t deal with this because if it even needs to be asked (and answered) it shows a possible terminal rot in spirit. Many of the contributors at Majority Rights think the question needs to be answered when Jews like Anon Ziv write another piece of hatred advocating that Euros intermarry (i.e. commit racial suicide). They think we have to justify our right to live; to speak of all the wonders of our past and potential for the future; to debate an enemy in the style of the Greeks when that enemy only values truth or distortion from how it benefits them as a group. Rather than answer the question I say take note of who is asking it and if/when we recover our strength they should not be forgotten. Because when they ask it is purely rhetorical, having already conditioned our masses to reflexively answer “no”. They are just testing to make sure we have gotten the message. The people that are trying to answer this question in our defense fail to see that by even providing a response they are surrendering the initiative to the enemy. Our existence self-justifies both our past and our future. Never, ever justify why we deserve to live into the future.

Euro Man is facing an unprecedented challenge over the next few generations to reclaim himself from oblivion. Will it happen and to what degree and in what ways are the question. You can be part of this renaissance or lost in the flood. Which will it be?

The Republican Party

2007-06-15T12:55:00.000-04:00

It took me a long time to wake up to the healthy, adult world of racial realism. Having grown up in a culture and family which inculcated almost no loyalty whatsoever to my race it should come as little surprise that I was functionally aracial as late as three years ago. I mean no disrespect to my family as they are “normal” in this regard. Ordinary white folk just don’t care about their race. I mean who wants to be a racist or a hater. That’s for Nazis and Klansmen but not for decent, patriotic, American Whites. Liberal, Conservative, Christian, and Atheist all agree on that. Such is the matrix we find ourselves in.

In spite of this being the publicly acceptable/demanded view by Whites on race for at least the last 40 years there was always simmering just beneath that surface the instinctive, yet mostly personalized, racism that can be kept from Whites no more than the sun from the afternoon sky. If the bizarre world of anti-racism (code word for anti-White racism) were given no outlet it would have soon imploded into either an outright revolt against the system that institutionalized it or a much more Bolshevistic crackdown on dissent: stripping away all pretenses of freedom of speech.

But there was an outlet - American Conservatism – and its physical manifestation came in the form of the Republican Party. In decreasing fashion during the White Man’s craven and idiotic slide towards extinction the Republican Party has supposedly stood for us. It now overtly disowns us with impunity and is plain to see to all who are not blind. George Bush champions amnesty (i.e. wholesale Euro-Am disenfranchisement) and demonizes its opponents; Carl Rove addresses La Raza and excommunicates the immigration restrictionist wing from the GOP communion table. The post-civil rights era Republicans have, until now, obliquely hinted that they would represent White interests. Now they explicitly disown us. What do we do?

I have long held the Democratic Party in contempt but my feelings against the Republican Party are now far stronger. The Democrats haven’t – since they abandoned Whites in the 60s and 70s – even tried to conceal their being the Party of the non-white and the degenerate. They are an enemy to healthy White life for sure. A false friend (euphemism for traitor) is a much more repugnant being. Alright, it’s silly of me to personalize political parties. They are functioning within our political reality rather than making it. Still, the leaders in it are accountable as traitors to our race. Dogs like Nixon and “heroes” like Reagan both were complicit. Though their bodies are spared just punishment, their legacies should not be.

JW Holliday posted at Majority Rights what we need to hope for and work for: the demise of the Republican Party, if not in actuality, then at least as any sort of false advocate for White interests. Read his post and comments as Jean Depression.

We are in a struggle for life and death. Europeans worldwide, are under attack physically, mentally, and spiritually by a foe with merciless (though dissimulated) intentions. Obfuscation as to our predicament and bogus solutions to its cure are not luxuries we can further entertain. Proponents of them are either dull/deluded or treacherous. The Republican Party is based by the former and led by the latter. Its demise is our gain.

As JW says, we should push for divisiveness and provocation since it will possibly stimulate a predictable overreaction by both Jewry and their tools. This, in turn, will wake up more Whites to what is happening and we will have one less false friend to betray us. We need to rally around our blood. The patriotards can be left with their ever shrinking and delusional rainbow coalitions.

David Lane

2007-05-31T14:05:00.000-04:00

David Lane died in prison on May 27th. I knew very little about him except for being the source of The 14 Words. If you are new to White Nationalism the 14 words are:

We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children.

He was sentenced to 190 years in prison (per Wikipedia) "for racketeering, conspiracy and violating the civil rights of radio talk show host Alan Berg on June 18, 1984". In case you haven't yet figured it out criminals from preferred groups who harm unpreferred victims get a small fraction of that sentence for much more serious offenses. But a white man who even in a small way says things that may indirectly lead to harming a hair on the head of a Jew is the worst type of villain to our "Justice" System. David Lane stood, was counted, and paid the price of a patriot for our beleaguered cause.

Knowing very little of how our "Justice" System prosecuted Lane I am informed by his own words in his final address to the jury from when he was convicted. It should come as no surprise that he was tried multiple times for the same offense when it served the system's purposes. Remember the LA Cops who dealt with Rodney King and got tried until they were finally convicted on the same charges? If you are a third class "citizen" in the USA these days - the ranking of white men behind both God's Chosen and their pets - anything goes regarding your treatment by the establishment.

Here is David Lane's final address to the jury. It is a love letter to a people who are in thrall to a death cult and who view life as a searing light to their darkened souls. May that this is not always so.

From the era of Plato, Socrates, and Cato to that of DaVinci and Michelangelo, to Locke and Shakespeare, to Jefferson and Franklin, Western civilization has sprung from the creative genius of one kindred people. In the vast panorama of time this period was but a fleeting moment and a glorious dream. The near future will show what manner of civilization will follow the passing of the White man. How sad and ironic that the American republic, which was formed exclusively for the preservation and promotion of Western man, became the vehicle through which he was destroyed both here and in his European homeland.

For many years I have struggled in whatever ways were available to a single powerless person to crack the iron media curtain and show my people that those very things which are protected, promoted, and forced upon us by those who today control the affairs of the Western world have destroyed every civilization we have ever built. I refer to such things as infanticide through abortion, a practice which has led to the murder of fifteen million babies of my kith and kin, and which is protected by the government and the Federal courts; homosexuality, whose adherents are forced upon us as role models and even teachers of our children by the government and Federal courts; and worst of all, the deliberate destruction of our very racial existence.

Those who have set out to mix and destroy the last remnant of Western man know full well that no people can continue in existence without a nation of their own in which to propagate, protect, and promote their own kind. They also know that a people who are not convinced of their own uniqueness and value will perish, and that is why I am slandered and destroyed when I show that nearly every improvement in the human condition has come from the fertile mind of Western man.

The White man is now a tiny minority in the world, yet he is denied not only a nation of his own but the integrity of the territorial imperative necessary to his survival. The guilt of those who partake in the destruction of this Race of men cannot be adequately described in the vocabulary of mortals. Regarding the prosecutors in this case, I say only that if the perpetuation of power is predicated on perjury, then the U. S. Attorneys are as solid as the Rock of Gibraltar. But if nature's laws allow for the concepts of justice or karmic debt, then they walk on quicksand.

That this trial even occurred is a violation of every Constitutional protection against double jeopardy. The legalistic machinations and chicanery involved in jeopardizing a man for potentially unlimited times for the same offense, by changing the legal description of that offense, by changing jurisdictions and so on are utterly repugnant to the sense of Anglo-Saxon justice as well as totally contrary both to the spirit and the intent of the Constitution. The mad frenzy of those who now control the Federal government of the United States to punish and destroy any White man who resists the deliberate admixture and murder of his rapidly disappearing Race is evident.

History predicts unspeakable horror for the last generation of White children, if I and others who shall come after me are not more successful in awakening our people from their sleep of death. Our task is as simple as it is overwhelmingly important: WE MUST SECURE THE EXISTENCE OF OUR PEOPLE AND A FUTURE FOR WHITE CHILDREN. In the face of that overriding historical imperative, what you do to me does not matter. I am not a brave man; I die the thousand deaths of the philosopher instead of the single death of the soldier. But I willingly sought this destiny, and I will not shrink from it.

Soon you will hear from another who will undoubtedly speak of his religious beliefs. Perhaps even at this late date, the power of a religious creed can save Western man, or perhaps Divine Providence will indeed lend a hand. If not, then those who rebel against tyranny must still accept the consequences with a shrug, or they are neither patriots nor men.

I say no more....

It would probably be helpful to utter the normal platitudes about needing to be law abiding and David Lane violated this but there comes a time when the "law" has lost sufficient legitimacy such that it not only is no longer virtuous to obey it but righteous to disobey it. Are we there yet? It is up to each man to decide for himself.

David Lane died in prison on May 27th, 2007. Rest in peace brother.

Politically Correct Poker

2007-05-10T10:32:00.000-04:00

The key to winning at the game of political correctness is knowing which hand trumps which. You had better learn these rules if you want to succeed in this wonderful land of America. The first concept to grasp is the hierarchy. It is the pecking order of the various hands in this game and there are three main dimensions of them. You have known them from a young age since we made your moral upbringing such a high priority. Here they are:

Race, Sexual Orientation, and Sex.

Within each dimension the order is very simple. Memorize them and you are ready to excel at this game.

A. Race. Yes we say race is a construction invented by evil white racists but that is for the little people. They will never see the contradiction unless we tell them it is respectable to think that way and that would be too much of a burden for their chaste little minds.

1. Jews. Note it is critical that this trump is never overtly announced. To announce it is worse than exercising the trump at all. This is what is called a silent trump. If Jews are ever involved in anything bad the story must either be ignored completely or the race not mentioned or worst case we're White. If Jews are ever associated with a good story the relationship must be handled subtly by use of menorahs, Stars of David, skull caps, etc., as visual cues but not too obviously.

2. African-Americans. Nothing subtle here. Everything Whites are known to be good at substitute A-A’s and all the bad things A-A’s are known for substitute Whites. If there are 1,000 interracial rapes, murders, etc., of which 90% are black on white make sure only the ones where Whites are the perps get any attention. Ignore the rest. If inventions are a topic, champion peanut butter over the light bulb. The more ham-handed the better in the representations of A-A’s. Even go so far as to make commercials with nothing but incompetent, indolent Whites and industrious, intelligent Blacks.

3. Congoids. Pure Congoids are preferably ignored but basically follow the same rules as A-A’s. A-A’s are higher since they are a mixed race that can be praised for their hybrid vigor (10-15% White) over their pure ancestors from the jungles of Africa.

4. Heinz 57. Tiger Woods-types are in a sense the best examples of the future America. They are nowhere men with no past and no future, but a very bright present up on their pedestals for proud display to Whites to envy.

5. Mestizos. This one must be handled with a bit more care since first generation Mestizo-Americans are much less valuable as nation wreckers than Africans. As they are Americanized they will be more valuable though it is doubtful they can move up the chain. Depends on whether H57 ends up more like Jennifer Lopez (too white) or Barack Obama (just right).

6. East Asians. Perfect in the Kwa but dangerous in their own homogeneous nations to the game.

7. Sub-Cons. In America this group is much lower than in the U.K. since H1B consultants aren’t as valuable as violent, lethargic, dole-takers. In another generation they will surely move up a notch. Stay tuned.

8. Arabs. Real Semites are only useful if we can keep them pitted against the dumb crackers. That they are fanatical Jew-haters keeps them down low. We’ll eventually “reform” Islam to give them a good chance for future progress.

9. Non-Hispanic Whites. Don’t even give them the respect of a positive label – Whites. Instead name them as the leftovers after Latinos are subtracted. Spit in their face and tell them it’s raining. They won’t do anything. They’ll even provide the best of their people to maintain this order. Gotta love it.

B. Sexual Orientation. Remember that none of these dimensions can be taken alone. The highest ones on this list are less valuable if they are non-White. Black fags are OK but let’s not push it too much. After all Blacks still fight a bit against genocide. Jew queers are not to be mentioned at all.

1. Fags. Non-White fags are high scoring (in PC poker) only if they are eloquent representatives which allows more recruitment among white children.

2. Dykes. If they weren’t into combat boots and crew cuts maybe they’d be first.

3. Pederasts. The younger the children and the more homo the higher the value.

4. Pedophiles. See note above since this one may sometimes drop below hetero. If White Men are marrying young White Women just below the statutory rape line but who are sexually mature (say 16 or 17 years old) then that is the lowest score of all. Remember Whites must be kept sterile if possible. If unavoidable have them marry later and remain less fecund.

5. Hetero

C. Sex. See the note on B. Feminism scores highest for Whites. We can’t completely ignore it for others since we don’t want to be considered hypocrites for crying out loud.

1. Women. Always remember this in all the other contexts. Young, white, militant feminist, dyke, good. Young, white, traditional, fecund, bad. In other words the score of sex is very much dependent on other characteristics involved.

2. Other. Any ecological or psychological situations leading to more white hermaphrodites or other physical oddities are good, hence the higher score.

3. Men. Again only the lowest within the context of being White and hetero.

Confused? Don’t worry. Now that you understand the scoring let’s play a hand. Dealer, give us our cards.

Alright I have one A-A female hetero, a Mestizo male fag, an Asian male hetero, one White male hetero, and a jew. And you have an A-A male hetero, a white male hetero, a White fag, an Asian female hetero, and a female Mestizo hetero. Now let’s count up the score.

My Hand
A-A Female Hetero +3
Mestizo Male Fag** +1
Asian Male Hetero*** +1
White Male Hetero -1
Jew

Your Hand
A-A Male Hetero* +3
White Male Hetero -1
White Female Hetero**** +2
White Fag +3
Mestizo Female Hetero***** +3

* Alright, you’re wondering why the A-A female and male have the same score. Keep in mind just how valuable A-A males are to us. The murder and mayhem are more priceless than a Master Card commercial. The male/female agitations are for Whites only.

** No the Mestizo fag isn’t worth as much as a white fag. Remember the dilemma here. Non-white perverts aren’t exactly loved in their own communities and unlike Whites, we need to respect somewhat their sensitivities. Yet we can’t bash them either so as to not lose our white queers. This is kind of a wink and a nod score.

*** Asian males are still a bit too independent for our liking, but at least they aren’t white.

**** The white female hetero is very hard to score and must be left to a professional – like me. If she is one of those rare, nasty racist, fascist bitches then she is lower than even a straight white male. But if she is the typical empty headed soccer mom who has listened to us and desires nothing more than her 1.4 children become the next American Idol then 2 is a good score. She will accept that she can never reach the 3 score of her betters.

***** Non-descript, compliant, and more fertile than rabbits. We do need to think on the practical side as well. They make better drones for the labor pool than A-A’s. Once the Whites are gone the A-A’s will have served their purpose. I’ll deny this if you ever say so.

Which hand won you ask? There’s only one card that you need to see that gives you the answer. Acknowledge it and move on, kapisch?

That was easy wasn’t it? Oh, you’re not confident you can remember the system? No worries. Just come to us and we will always patiently explain it to you. Never take these analytic loads on your own mind. Life is hard enough as it is. Trust us.

Epitaphic Couplet

2007-01-23T13:48:00.000-05:00

Did you ever wonder
‘bout this thing called history?
I hear it’s all the rage now
For those who watch TV.

At least that’s my presumption
for I hear them say
that my folk are all evil
from creation’s first day.

My people do not exist it seems
unless there is a need
to pin the blame for all life’s ills
upon our burdened seed.

The piper playing this pretty tune
unto our open ears
divines our basest motives
to make his story clear.

Reflection on this situation
had better lead a man
to either bite his tongue
or move to Kurdistan.

You think that you love beauty,
strength, justice, loyalty?
Then time for reprogramming
to see reality.

Up is down and left is right
and you had better not
think that you know better;
else contemplate your lot.

The way prepared is one that must
be taken with a dose
of sour grapes for he who thinks
or bliss for he who won’t.

As we pass remember
with sardonic wit,
that whiteless jewry prospers
not a blessed bit.

The end of Little Geneva?

2007-01-14T15:58:00.000-05:00

Several days ago LG got hacked and today there is a posting saying LG is packing it in for good. Because of the reference to the LGR it seems legitimate to me, though maybe that is a clever ruse by a false friend who betrayed trust. The other references on the final post are vague. The only person mentioned by name is Doug Wilson, and he – aka Dishonest Doug - is complimented. Weird.

If this is really how it ends then it’s a shame. The most sane Christian outlet I had found is gone. As virtual and abstract as it was it still provided a link to others who were striving to recapture spiritual and physical health for our kin. It was a fledgling community or at least a community support forum.

I do hope to find out what is behind this sudden – to me anyway – state of affairs. If they don’t reinstitute LG or resurface with their old monikers I wish all my brethren and their families the best.

Youtube

2006-11-10T21:16:00.000-05:00

A media outlet superficially outside the Jewish filter is itself a tool for that monstrosity. An example is a headline I just saw on Yahoo News coming from AP where White LA cops are roughing up a Spic (http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061110/ap_on_re_us/videotaped_arrest). The video comes from You-Tube but since it serves our Masters' ham-handed anti-white propaganda it is now to be distributed thru Jew-Tube: AP and Yahoo today, tomorrow the world. So, even if there are a million things coming thru You-Tube that are favorable to a White racialist viewpoint that reach a few thousand real humans the one anti-white exception (at least that is how it will be spun) is all that will be worthy of distribution to the millions of voting bipeds that prove what a farce democracy is.

There is a second story here as well and it is the content of the story. Looking at it straight on it contains all the expected components: ACLU analysis, reflections on Rodney King, lamentations by the Police Chief, a Spic activist, yada yada. That is the hackneyed pabulum any free White Man should expect. But here’s my take. In a way I hope Whites are purged and/or quit from urban police forces so that the law of the jungle returns to the barrio and the ghetto. Let the mestizos and blacks kill each other in their 3rd World hellholes but when they come into our territory we need to learn some lessons from our ancestors and thrash them. We can do it with our police (unlikely since they are under Hymie’s thumb) or with our own private militias (eventually needed if we will survive) or as individuals (the most doable but ultimately untenable).

Jews have a bit of a dilemma with a story like this. Do they push it and possibly destroy the order the cops impose which then exposes their pets more as they really are to the lemmings or do they back off and lose another chance to prove what nasty racists Whites are? They’ll try to get both of course. Keep Whitey in the police to make sure the forces stay effective but tie their hands sufficiently so that more White Cops die while at the same time more brown thugs are kept free to perform their duties. Under this scenario the cops will both keep sufficient order in the ghetto so that the tan-man can continue to breed and expand and still be there to be used as propaganda fodder when the need arises.

Jewry is learning to better take advantage of the internet. More and more it will serve to generate the content for its “news”. That frees up more members of the Master Race to use their enormous creativity on how best to market all this material to its drooling customers.

MoooooOOOO

2006-11-05T01:07:00.000-05:00

Yeeehaaa! It’s time for the roundup. Time for good little crackers everywhere to keep propping up the legitimacy of the U.S. Government by voting for Republicrat or Demican, Conservaral or Libetive, Tomatoes or Tomaytoes, Mickey or Donald. The variations are endless and you can look forward to an “I Voted” sticker with stars and stripes when you’re done. Two years ago I went into my chute like a good little deracinated, judeo-xtian lemming of the ‘conservative’ flavor and pulled the lever for one of the good guys. They were the good guys weren’t they? The Washington Times, the Wall Street Journal, National Review, Human Events, World Net Daily, Pat Robertson, D. James Kennedy, Jerry Fallwell, James Dobson, World Magazine, the National Taxpayers Union, the Heritage Foundation, the Free Congress Foundation, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Gordon Liddy, and Michael Savage all said so. The Clinton era was then four years past and we were kicking those nasty terrorist Muslim’s butts. We were going to return to an era of balanced budgets and low taxes, small government, constitutional law, border control, and all kinds of other wonderful things. Republicans would be in the White House, Senate, and House for several more years. Let the good times roll.

This was of course a complete sham. It was in the election of 2004 just like it was in 2000, 1996, 1992, 1988, 1984, 1980, …, all the way back to 1932 at least. Granted every year that passes takes us into an ever more overt anti-white situation but it was known by the forward thinking and courageous patriots of our people for a long time. I finally woke up right after the charade of 2004. It has taken the almost complete ethnic cleansing of Whites in my home area over the last 20 years for me to ask “why did this happen?” and then “why did no one stop it?” to “why is this not even mentioned as anything other than inevitable and/or good?” If you ever search for these answers (most never do) you will end in a similar spot to where I am now.

Many more of our people need to wake up during this year’s farce. Not wake up in the sense of going over to the jackasses unless, that is, you want to speed up the collapse. That is a thought to consider…

The slow suicide of the White Race that has happened by supporting what is now called conservatism is our worst option. This is true even of the handful of Buchananite conservatives like Tom Tancredo since they will no more stand up for us than Whore-hay Boosh himself. They all bow down to our masters and the religion they have forced on us. Constitutionalism is now worse than out-of-control fag-worshipping liberalism because with the latter we know our enemies rule wheras with the former a treacherous friend gives us a false sense of security. If the Constitution were now used as toilet paper it would have more value than the current cover it gives for the regime (and I’m not referring to the Crawford castrato) that rules. A new pro-White party is needed that names our enemy – Jewry and its Goy collaborators – and acts for us.

Short of that, stay home next Tuesday and watch the roundup with the eyes of a real and free man for a change. It may be the best vote you ever cast.

Paleo-Conservatism Bares Its Fangs

2006-09-22T22:32:00.001-04:00

It’s time to party, or so I’m told. Randy Graf recently won the Republican nomination for a congressional seat from Arizona. He is one of “us”, one of the good guys, not a nasty liberal or one of those open borders, establishment Republicans. He is Team America’s boy. Bay Buchanan (Team America’s main cheerleader) has been singing his praises. The immigration reformer, Tom Tancredo loves him. Graf now has a chance to show just how much he will pull for “us” and he did. See here:

http://azstarnet.com/metro/147648

Don’t it bring tears to your eyes? Don’t you just want to go out and sing the Star-Spangled Banner and salute Old Glory since our reversals are coming to an end? Graf ain’t some “crazy racist”. What a relief. You see, paleo-conservatives – these supposed bastions of all that remains good in America – know what they are supposed to and that is “us” aren’t White Folks. Where would we be without them?

For those White racialists who believe that Team America and the Minutemen might speak for you, think again. We are “crazies” according to paleo-conservatism. Makes you tingly all over don’t it? We, who don’t want to go the way of the Dodo – and who truly are “paleo”; thinking as our fore-fathers did. We knew that the Liberals hated us and the Country Club Republicans hated us. Now these fire-breathing old-school “conservatives” prove themselves no different. What truly are these jokers trying to conserve? What is their mission? Their vision?

We (I know many racialists who did, including obviously Duke) gave these people material and spiritual support and in return get calumny and treachery. No longer can they be treacherous since their strategy is now exposed. Next time we have only ourselves to blame.

All this should be no surprise. Sheeny says “grovel” and Cracker says “right foot or left”. We deserve no respect from our enemies because we have earned none. This fraudulent and pathetic political movement had already revealed its intentions when the American Conservative editorialized that White Nationalists have no place in the immigration reform movement. They didn’t enlighten us as to where we do have a “place”. Answer: nowhere. If P-C is the best we’ve got we’d better hang it up. Paleo-con racialists - where to now?

So this is Caucasian?

2006-09-20T20:31:00.000-04:00

A nice resource to use to help keep your family safe is a sex-offender registry. There are quite a few web sites to choose from. I checked into my area and it is loaded with offenders, partly because there are quite a few people in the outskirts of imperial headquarters. The other part is – how shall I say this so as not to offend all my sensitive readers? - all the wonderful pieces (especially the ones “of color”) making up the patchwork quilt that is modern America. One of these sites (familywatchdog) displays a map with color coded dots of all the offenders. In particular I look for child molesters and repeat offenders. When you click on an individual link you get a picture of the offender and a description of them. I looked at all the child molesters on the screen which covered a good part of my region. It was funny to see every White person correctly described as Caucasian, and also Arabs, Mestizos, Africans, and Asians described as Caucasian. There were also several non-Whites described as “unknown” when Helen Keller could have figured out what they were.

Look in particular at:

These “Caucasians”…

A.

B.

C.

D.

E.

F.

and these “unknowns”…

G.

H.

I.

J.

There were 37 total child offenders with home links that were visible on the query I ran and the 10 misleading pictures above were among these so I didn’t cherry pick these results. So roughly one third of these are distorting; either they are mislabeled or labeled as unknown when it is obvious. The other 27 results were either blacks or whites though many of those whites were swarthy Sicilian types. Funny that none of the real Whites were mislabeled or unknown. When it comes to white wrong-doing it ain’t ever misidentified. Everyone with half a brain knows there are the following broad groups in the US:

African-Americans (including Africans)
American Indians
Mestizos
East Asians (Chinese, Koreans, Japs, etc.)
Subcons (Asian Indians & Pakis)
Arabs (including Persians)
Whites

These are the groups that are clearly contending with each other for survival. Jews, chameleon-like, define themselves however best serves their purposes. Generally they would pass as either White or Arab. There are others but they are insignificant. There is also quite a lot of intra-group fighting, esp. among East Asians and Whites. As we all know Whites are the un-group/the nowhere men; the group that can be punched but can’t defend itself by all the acceptable “rules”. B is White? If the cops beat him up he would be the new Rodney King.

Would any of the “Caucasians” above be considered the nasty white devils that Jewry caricatures as White? Of course not. In that case Whites are Nordic, blond, and blue-eyed. Would any of them be defenders of white society and work to preserve our culture and race? Hell no, because they aren’t us. They know that and we know that, so why can’t the FBI or whoever classified these people see that. Because it ain’t kosher by gosh. When it comes to crime data, anything that inflates the negative view of whites as serial killers and pedophiles is fair.

The demographic data in the US is riddled with distortion. I’ve seen the “official” reports on the race data in my area and it is a complete joke. Not only are we way over-counted in population figures, we are also over-counted (using this very unscientific sample) in crime stats. In spite of this racial crime data shows how less prone to crime “whites” are. It’s already known that Mestizos are more criminal than Whites but how about they get to take all their refuse and leave us only with our own criminals. It’s generally known that Asians are less criminal than “whites” but putting people like J in unknown skews their figures.

It’s getting late and there is diversity to celebrate. What am I waiting for?

Mel Gibson meet Marlon Brando

2006-07-31T10:43:00.000-04:00

I happened to get a copy of the Washington Compost yesterday and scanned thru it to see if there was anything worth reading an voila; there was a short story about Mel Gibson getting arrested for drunk driving and having a tirade against Jewry. Granted he was intoxicated and his guard was let down but it was refreshing to see a public figure allow some air into the stagnant public forum. Of course the Compost is run by Jews for Jews so it attacked his anti-semitism and pounded its chest in vindication for its doubted characterization of him in the buildup to the release of The Passion. The Compost even reminded its lobotomizsed Goy readership and its Chosenites how Gibson did not prostrate himself before the Holocaust but instead only said that Jewry was one group among many that suffered in WWII. Gouge out his eyes and cut out his tongue, the uppity dog!

The sad, though expected thing, is that the story didn’t end with Gibson’s defiance of Jewry but his prostration to it, “deeply regretting” his remarks and attributing his tirade to his struggle with alcohol. It’s hard to blame him for not really being a William Wallace in our time. Even the real William Wallace doesn’t compare to the fake one. The same thing happened to Marlon Brando a few years ago. He went so far to grovel and cry at the feet of the blessed and perfect Abraham Foxman of the Anti-Defamation League – begging for forgiveness and redemption from an anointed one. Gibson has not done that yet (it’s still too early) but expect Jewry to demand it.

Public figures in the last 100 years who have defied the Master Race have not fared well. Jewry knows how to make an example of uppity Whites, either individuals (Charles Linbergh, Henry Ford, etc.) or nations (Russia and Germany). I see no way in the next few generations Whites will cast off this parasite from our presence. I have spoken to enough “average” Americans (inside my family and out) who will hear of many things but not an attack on the Chosen Ones. Not that I expect average folks to do anything contrary to that which they have been conditioned to believe; it is for them too deep, too emotional, too dear. They are, in some sort of strange reverse projection “Jews” even as real Jews despise them. Judeoxtian-holocaustianity is at their core now. Mention Jewry as our enemy and the fists fly up in defense – “But not ALL Jews are against us. It is not right to generalize”. When I reply that they have attacked us AS A GROUP and we must respond in kind all I hear is, “it is not right to stereotype.”

This is another effect of judeoxtianity – niceness. Jews never fail to remind us how Christ turned the other cheek so good little xtians must do likewise “to make certain that their chaste minds are insulated against a wicked temptation not to love their enemies”- to quote Revilo Pendleton Oliver on a similar subject. Hollywood, the MSM, and Academia have demonized Whites AS A GROUP my whole life yet we are expected to defy them person by person. Jewry IS collectively guilty of crimes against the White Race in our own homelands for centuries but especially in the last 100 years. Why? Because every substantial political movement disproportionately influenced by or run by Jews has acted against us. I didn’t finally wake up to this fact until just recently.

Another thing I have heard by the conditioned masses is “but you don’t deny The Holocaust (TM), do you?” I now reply truthfully that I don’t know. This is usually met with dismay. I explain that I have become very skeptical of the claims of Jewry, and that since this is now considered the greatest heresy in any public discussion (to the point of imprisonment) it raises red flags in my mind as to its truthfulness. Why ban evaluation of this subject unless the assertions are dubious? What about freedom of speech that Jews claim to love so much? When I follow up with a question of why did the Germans perpetrate “the holocaust” more dismay follows. “Of course it’s because Hitler wanted a scapegoat. Jews did nothing wrong.” Lastly I ask why is the persecution of European Jewry at the center of our consciousness instead of the holocaust (not trademarked) of White Christian Ukrainians by Jewish Bolshevism? Most of the folks I talk to don’t say “tell me more”, they say – in effect – “shut up”. As long as it took me to see the light on this issue I think I would have been very open to hearing “me” several years ago. But most are not.

We have an alien race, an alien religion, and an alien consciousness grafted into our psyche’s all to serve the alien’s malignant purposes; notably their ascension and our destruction. Rather than confront this life and death struggle head on our more intelligent people are directed to think harmless, even counterproductive, nonsense like the gummint blew up the Twin Towers and the Pentagon, Islam is “our” greatest enemy, Israel is a wondrous friend, and modern America is worth defending. The length of “acceptable” subjects for our people to devote their political energies on is only exceeded by their meaninglessness. Likewise the few meaningful ones are spoken about even less than the emperor having no clothes.

I hope Gibson defies our masters but I don’t blame him for not doing so; he has a family to support. But I pray he doesn’t grovel either, even as many of the judeoxtians who flocked to The Passion turn on him. Betrayal by friends and family has got to be the worst thing a man can face and that would be Gibson’s fate. If he proves not to be a martyr I have no complaint. I already know I am not.

P.S. Seeing the cover of the JewSA Today this morning is a fitting exclamation point. Right under the perfunctory attack headline on Gibson, directing the lemmings back to the Lifestyle section to get taught what happens to bad anti-semites, was a picture of several Lebanese children dead from an Israeli bomb. I doubt that was an attempt at irony.

Circle the wagons or roll out the red carpet?

2006-07-13T11:35:00.000-04:00

As White Nationalists scattered around the world we are bound very loosely by blood and by a desire to save our people. We are not yet a power that our enemy has to take seriously since our numbers are few and we have little power or influence. Still, the enemy occasionally bites us, whether as a test or as a sincere effort to hurt us is unclear. At those times our unity, or lack thereof, is displayed.

Recently I came across a tidbit buried in a discussion thread at Majority Rights that brought this home. Someone posted, within the thread, an article about how White “Supremacist” groups (90% of the time the label is a lie; Separatist being much more accurate) were being infiltrated and undermined. The only thing referenced was the arrest of Shaun Walker and a compatriot of his/ours affiliated with National Alliance. Shaun Walker was the Chairman of that group until then and his offense was supposedly beating up one of the Chosenites’ pets. It is much more probable that this was a bar fight that happened spontaneously (as has been claimed) but when you are White and you have a run in with a person of color and especially if you are an avowed white separatist you are guilty. The Establishment (Jew) article sang the praises of this arrest since it will help root out the “hate” (uppity Whites defying our own genocide) in this pristine land of virtue and culture – the United States. That the article was full of jew-propaganda masquerading as unbiased news is no surprise.

What shocked me is that this happened June 12th and it was the first time I had heard of it. Furthermore, the tea-sipping advocate of “respectable” white nationalism who runs Majority Rights (Guessedworker), and has allowed it to be hijacked by an anti-white troll, was GLAD the arrest happened. Not glad because he expected the arrest to awaken and motivate our movement but glad because National Alliance was not as respectable as he was. NOW, he thinks the common man will flock to our cause because this blemish is removed. The flaming dimwit, who “for all his subtleties, has not wisdom”. Why will the inert “common man” come to a group that will not look after its own? The common man is smarter than that. At this point I doubt I would exert one calorie defending Guessedworker when the commissars come to take him away. Others should consider likewise since he not only would not defend us but PRAISE our incarceration.

Now I don’t visit many sites in an average day but many are pro-white and I had not heard of this news. News like that should spread like wildfire amongst all pro-white forums regardless of whether they agree with all National Alliance’s views. When one of us is attacked by our enemy we should consider it an attack on all of us.

If and until the White Nationalist movement becomes a community we will continue to invite the very abuse our enemy heaps upon us. When they come to haul one of our brothers away they should leave having paid a price for even considering it. As it is they leave with tea and crumpet stains on their shirts and the blessings of “decent” white nationalist ringing in their ears for a job well done.

The Unavoidability of the Jewish Question

2006-07-11T12:01:00.000-04:00

The following is a series of posts made by Wintermute at The Civic Platform. The comments came in response to a post there by Daedalus who asked if the Jewish Question is really something upon which White Nationalists should spend so much energy. Daedalus’ post was very sensible and the question is worth asking by newbies to WN. Wintermute’s answer is so well done it deserves to be seen by that handful of intrepid souls who wander to this small corner of the fever swamps but missed it there.

Here is a little background for those who may be otherwise unaware. American Renaissance is an organization run by Jared Taylor and it focuses on race realism. It covers subjects resulting from race differences such as crime rates, intelligence, and culture. The focus of AmRen is the negative consequences other races have on the White Race. It does a good job as far as it goes. Until a few months ago AmRen had a fair amount of debate about the causes of the on-going fall of our people. This often turned to the Jewish Question and there are advocates of at least three main views on this:

1) Jews must be courted and are only our enemies in the same fashion as white liberals and that anti-semites need to be purged from White Nationalist groups because Jews are white (this view is characterized by the blogger Lawrence Auster - View from the Right)

2) Jews overwhelmingly have been, still are, and always will work against Whites in very destructive ways and that they have no place in any white nation much less any WN organization and that they are NOT white (characterized by the late William Pierce - founder of National Alliance)

3) Jews have largely worked against us but since they control most institutions of power we must try to avoid giving offense.

Jared Taylor used to allow this debate but he had some sort of epiphany and has opted to shut down this subject altogether so he is now an example of the third variety. There is a fourth view and it is what I call Jew worship but since these people are never White Nationalists it is purely relegated to trolls allowed into WN forums. For now AmRen can still display all the destruction the white world is facing but cannot talk about possibly the most compelling cause - Jewry. It’s like seeing the Wizard of Oz but never being able to look behind the curtain.

Here’s Wintermute:

• I agree that this is the most vexed question facing racialism at the current moment.

However, I must disagree with Daedalus when he writes, “No one will ever care about the JQ until they are convinced that white racial preservation, or ”racism,” as it is pathologized today, is a moral duty that we owe to future generations of our own people.”

“No one” is not quite accurate. I was turned, virtually overnight, from what I call a “Benetton Libertarian” to what is now deemed a “racialist” of an almost obsessive cast, by a reading of Kevin MacDonald’s book. It was obvious to me, almost instantly, that the model MacDonald presented not only accounted for observed phenomena in a more parsimonious way than current theories of the architecture of political power, but that it could be used to make very accurate predictions as well.

I will be honest, Daedalus, I cannot tell whether you are anti-Judaic (a term to be preferred to the now loaded and unusable anti-Semitic) in private, admitting to a genteel Jared Taylor racialism, or whether you are genuinely unaware of the depths of the Jewish Question. It’s not like you would be alone, even among the greatest men of our race. It is very plain in retrospect that, though he suspected the degree to which Jews direct Western life, inner and outer, that Hitler himself could not bring himself to believe the depth of the problem. So you’re cagey and keeping your options open. That’s good. I respect that, though as I have said, I disagree.

Taylor has now sold himself and his organization lock, stock, and barrel to the Jews. They will slowly arrive in small numbers, accumulate slowly (not all will admit to Jewish ancestry or loyalty), provide AmRen with access to media and respectability. Jared Taylor will be the first White Nationalist who will appear in a major Northeastern Newspaper without the epithet “far right extremist” or “neo-Nazi” listed as his official title.

Now, I have my sources concerning Mr. Taylor. I happen to know that his view of the Jewish Question, is, if anything, more alarmist and hysterical than my own. The less said about his devotion to the Third Reich, the better, though I will say he owns more paraphernalia of that regime than I do (full disclosure: I own none). Mr. Taylor, who has built the most respectable WN organization in the United States, has effectively outlawed discussion of the Jewish question, which he has already disavowed on the Donahue show and various radio programs. It’s not hard to follow his logic, since it follows yours: given that Jews are so powerful, there is simply no way to even challenge them openly and prevail.

So far as it goes, that’s not an unfair statement to make. It may yet prove to be impossible, or it may not. My take is: it hasn’t been tried yet.

However:

As the years pass, and AmRen fills with Jews like Polichinello, Michael Weiner, and so forth, I predict one of two things will happen: either the group will be directed by its Jewish wing into purposeless and vicious encounters with Blacks and Mexicans, which can be used by “non-WN” Jews, via their media cousins, to destroy the legitimacy of all Euro-American Civil Rights movements, or they will simply be marginalized and encouraged to vent their increasing rage at more and more inconsequential targets, as the Birchers were. Remember, the Jews bought them out, and directed an anti-Communist group (in the 50s!) down avenues of complete irrelevance while they were roundly mocked so well and so often in the press that they are a laughingstock, even today.

You can see how easy it would be for Jews to do this to AmRen.

Finally, consider the odds on the gamble Jared has just made with our future: for a few radio interviews, appearances on daytime TV, and columns on Horowitz FrontPage, he has turned his well assembled WN group into the new Birchers. Not only are Jews now in a position to completely neutralize or marginalize WN or any subsequent racialist movement, the sacrifice of maybe fifty activists and a few hundred million dollars (pocket change, really) will now allow them to claim far and wide that:

a) Jews are actually not monolithic, and have a variety of political positions and concerns, which they do not and, even more damaging and nightmarish, that

b) Jews are on “our” side or even worse, that they are “White”, which they are not.

The PR damage of these last two listed items, to my mind, is even more dangerous than the simple marginalization of racialist opposition to current attempts to erase culture, family, race, nation, heritage, and religion as mediating structures between the “hierarchically harmonious” civilizations that Whites create, on the one hand, and the totalitarian nightmares and chaos that seem the only expression of Jewish political action among foreign populations.

We’ve discussed this before. There are times to remain silent on the debates surrounding German internment of Jews in the Second World War. The best approach to presenting the Jewish question is a challenging question but not impossible one. The main points of Culture of Critique, after all, can be summarized as an hour long DVD which gets the message across pretty well, not to mention the fact that the Jews - and no one else - are gearing up to drive America into war with Iraq, which will be our end as financial and political power forever. Wider repercussions, such as regional wars, the use of nuclear weaponry, and other possible sequelae to Israel’s command to the United States to attack Iran, will be the milieu in which we spread our message.

As I have said before, the hour of decision is not upon us, it is drawing to a close. I do not think much is achievable for the White Race, but something might still be saved. Whatever might be saved is not going to be saved by Taylor’s new John Birch Society, anymore than immigration is going to be resisted by the Sierra Club, on account of a hundred billion dollar contribution by a Jewish billionaire, who gave them instructions to purge the group of its anti-immigration wing, which they promptly did. So the largest lobby of its kind was emasculated by one Jewish player.

What do you think will become of Jared Taylor infinitely smaller, less influential, and widely hated lobby when it has fifty Jews inside?

This is not the time for irresolution. Our Race is almost certainly doomed, on account of its own actions in accord with Jewish demands during the Second World War (there are distal causes, of course). Since annihilation is virtually assured, why not go out saying what is true?

Christ, piss ant medieval peasants would regularly give Jews the boot. Are we of so much less stature than they morally that this is beyond us? They simply assumed their problem was over once the local group of bloodsuckers was dispensed with. They had failed to understand their own interdependence with other White States, just as they had no understanding of Jewish tenacity and hate, or their capacity to act virtually as a colony organism. How could a peasant know that a people so violently expelled would move heaven and earth to get back in? It does beggar belief. However, thanks to the works of Chad Powers, Kevin MacDonald, and others, we have a greater understanding of Jewish psychology, and can avoid the mistakes and the fate of our forefathers.

Are you saying we can’t create a similar climate of opinion here? Or that we shouldn’t?

I say, with chances of victory and defeat roughly the same I would rather go down telling the truth than lying. However, I keep in mind the Greco-Roman dictum that we may lie in two cases: to enemies, in order to elude them, and to the sick, feeble minded, and others of reduced capacity, to prevent them from harming themselves or others.

Obviously, we need to think more clearly how best to frame this question. However, I do not regard it as a debatable fact that Jews are now, and have always been, on a wartime footing with whomever they live among - back to Roman times - and that unless we engage them on the same grounds, we will lose.

Comment by wintermute — July 4, 2006 #

• One more point about Jared Taylor’s wager - Taylor is not a fool or a knave and I do not wish to indicate that he is.

What I want for readers here to consider is this: Taylor is betting the farm on the fact that ‘awakening’ whites to Mexicans and Blacks will eventually lead to an understanding of the Jewish Question, even though he has just made it plain that there will be no open discussion of the latter.

He’s using a Trojan Horse strategy: get Jews to foot the bill to educate Whites to their own best interests, and then watch as those ever politically clever Whites put two and two together, and turn on their ‘benefactors’. It’s a fair bet, and if we were dealing with anyone else but Jews, it might work.

My viewpoint is different: the White Man is such a politically retarded beast that he won’t even think about group interests until the electrodes are already on his genitals, if you’ll pardon my French. The Germans did seem to get the point - finally - when they had been reduced to abject poverty, debt slavery, and with a Jew controlled Empire waiting to swallow them up and murder their upper classes. But of course, those are the Germans, the best of us. There’s no guarantee regarding the rest of the branches of our racial family as to proactivity in this regard. Germany itself is now a lobotomized corpse, from which we cannot again expect help, or anything at all for that matter. They were well and truly murdered by the British and the Americans.

The Jews are betting that they can infiltrate, manipulate, and neutralize the largest and best WN organization in the US, and make it serve Jewish goals. My money is on them - they’ve taken down much larger targets. Jared Taylor is a marginal figure, if not despised, at least suspect. Charles Lindbergh was a god, and the Jews turned him into an unperson in a week’s time after the Dearborn speech. AmRen will be given the Free Republic treatment in short order, adding another few thousand Americans to the list of people whose entire information news intake is vetted by Jews first before consumption.

In addition to the “Jews are White” strategy for the ones who still have the Ferengi phenotype, there are also the ones who really do look like us, and never need to announce their presence, simply lending their assent in group discussions to standpoint that are friendly to Jewish interests. They get us coming and going.
Now, Jews have been strategizing as a Race for three thousand years - for those who doubt this, a rereading of the book of Exodus is in order. Whites have been strategizing as a race - well, it would be more accurate to say Whites did strategize as a Race for about twelve years in the mid 20th century.

12 years experience vs. 3000, with all of those on our side who strategized already tortured, burned, bombed, hung, ethnically cleansed, starved, or sent to the Soviets to be worked to death in labor camps, and their children brainwashed and silenced. So, unlike our Jewish counterparts, we lack that from-the-crib instruction in going for the jugular while feeling not a twinge of compassion in doing what must be done.
I think Taylor’s gamble is laughable because the level of political acumen (not to mention money, media access, etc.) between the two groups are not even remotely comparable.

And, although it did only last twelve years, the other method does seem to have the advantage of, um, working. Even to the point of holding off four Planetary Empires while so doing. The small hope that I have is that just a few years of Internet access has brought the most intense propaganda campaign in history - “The Holocaust” - to within measurable distance of its end. And all this just fifty years after our first slave revolt was put down so definitively! That is indeed heartening.

I do most of my work in what is referred to as “the real world” and I daresay I have ‘converted’ more people to the JQ than most online boards. It is a hard but not impossible road that begins with courage and ends with confidence. People who open Whites’ eyes to the Black ethnic cleansing of our cities, and Mexican depredations of the economy, are of course, wonderful. I simply feel that all of these branches of work must be done without Jews. That group which does not exclude Jews will eventually be ruled by them.

Likewise, there must be groups that openly speak about Jewish power and wrongdoing, expressing the appropriate degree of anger while so doing, and not just dispensing words. If you are afraid of the person you’re accusing, it plays badly with the crowd. Americans, especially, hate a loser.

Comment by wintermute — July 4, 2006 #

• The responses I have seen from JQ’ers are all over the spectrum: shoot them, give them the boot, name the Jew, etc.

Create a climate of opinion that does for them what the climate of opinion does for us: causes self-hatred, limits reproduction, encourages emigration, inspires fear of openly speaking in one’s own ethnic interests for fear of physical reprisal or job loss, etc. Continually feed this climate over decades, until the very sanity of the target group is shaken. This is one advantage we have in comparison to the Jews: much lower levels of neuroticism. They’ll break psychologically very quickly. Look at Michael Weiner. For him, the “Holocaust” is on its way already! And all of this because a few people on the internet have noticed that PNAC and the Iraq war were basically a Jew thing. Ditto Iran. I would say two decades of a “Critique of Jewish Culture” would have them begging for terms.

This process should be brought to a feverish summit where repatriation or sterilization are offered as alternatives for Jews, Muslims, etc.

Blacks and Mexicans: give them the South and Southwest. For the sins of America some form of permanent punishment, which is also a reminder of the terrible costs that externalizing costs and moral cowardice to later generations, that has a permanent effect on White political discourse is needed. New constitution sets death penalty for slavery or any related economic model, including immigration for cheap labor. Nation busting by capitalists will be the occasion for eye-opening reprisals a squeamish public and a cowardly and soft ruling class will never forget.

Intergenerationality is the key word here. We will initiate the project - and must design institutions which remain true to their charters. It is our children’s children who will see this process through to completion.

Comment by wintermute — July 4, 2006 #

Wintermute has captured the probable destiny of AmRen given Jared Taylor’s choices, using the JBS as a template. Wintermute does not underestimate our enemy but criticizes our folly for underestimating them. Jews have not survived and thrived for millennia in hostile environments because they are weak our soft; they are cunning and ruthless. This is not to say we should mimic them in every way since much of their scheming has made them a parasitic race. They can no longer live on their own. They need us while at the same time their malice and paranoia drives them to destroy us. It’s a contradiction buried deep in the Jewish soul.

Here is another piece of background showing the pervasiveness of anti anti-semitism. At Majority Rights, a forum slavishly devoted to making pro-White views “respectable”, there is still a fair amount of discussion about the JQ though it has a few contributors (one especially) who think just like Master Freud would have liked of his goy toys - that anti-semitism is a form of mental illness rather than a very healthy form of self-defense. Wintermute was one of the most eloquent proponents of the importance of a successful resolution to the JQ at MR and for that he was banned for a time from the site along with Friedrich Braun. The pathological jew-worshippers (and I do mean worship) still ply their trade at MR but not the more vocal anti-jews. Nonetheless, MR is still a useful site, as is, to a lesser degree, AmRen.

I suspect MR will follow the lead of AmRen if it ever becomes more of a force in shaping public opinion. It is too costly to defy our real enemy. Chasing their spawn down endless rat holes is more what they want of us. From Wintermute’s comments make special note of the Sierra Club. I remember as a child growing up to the impending doom of the “population explosion”. It permeated public thought, from governmental initiatives (the EPA) to novels like Soylent Green. The theme was mankind is the world’s bane. Pro-environment groups like the Sierra Club were big into this mindset and it is at least partly true; there can be too many people for a given eco-system. The funny thing is that once White populations dropped below replacement the constant reminders of population explosion have become fewer and fewer; this even as 3rd World populations continue to boom. Also, instead of being very anti-immigration, as should be expected from any pro-environment group, the Jew-money has neutered the Sierra Club. It no longer speaks for the environment but for Jewry. If there’s a conflict of interest, within a pro-environment organization, between Jewry wanting more Mestizo’s to overrun America and Environmentalists wanting fewer immigrants guess who wins? The same thing is now true for organized labor. They don’t speak for labor’s interests (fewer workers to keep wages high) but in Jewry’s (more darkies to bring down whitey).

There can be no health and life for any being which has surrendered its existence to another. Jews have shown, for so long, such a hostility to our people that we can no longer allow them in our presence – especially not in revolutionary organizations (and White survivalism is now very revolutionary) intended to fight for our interests. It is them or us. Unlike them I hope that they can live on in their homeland or some other place of exile in peace though as far from us as this earth allows. They afford our people no such right to exist. That is their wont. We do not have to be eaten from within by the same hate, just the love to live.

The Delusions of Wordism

2006-07-05T16:14:00.000-04:00

Wordism is a term used by Bob Whitaker to describe groups primarily organized by ideology. It is the bane of the White Race. It pits Republicans against Democrats, conservatives against liberals, communists against capitalists, etc. His idea, which I think is obvious after one is exposed to it, is that Whites are killing themselves with words; words that are often important but secondary to our survival. David Duke recently made a speech of a similar vein. Other races are not now primarily organized by words but by blood. This is our great comparative disadvantage.

A classic example of the futility of wordism is the limp-wristed opposition paleo-conservatism provides neo-conservatism. Neo-conservatism is a more moderate flavor of liberalism than hardcore or moderate leftism. Paleo-conservatism is a more moderate flavor of neo-conservatism. They are all word fetishists. Go to Chronicles Magazine and read the comments to get a sample of this. Outstanding comments and thought provoking, but almost none sullied with the reality of blood. These are among the most well educated commentators in the paleo-con world. Until the core of paleo-conservatism abandons its primarily ideological orientation, it is purely reactionary – that is taking the scraps the Establishment gives them and trying to turn it into something. These scraps aren’t fit for dogs much less free men. Reaction is not a strategy for victory, action is. Until they rally to the explicit call of the White Race and say so they should continue to flounder in obscurity.

Team America is a political action committee that is what I would consider classic paleo-con. It is headed by Bay Buchanan, Pat's sister, and I have a lot of respect for what they are trying to do. They are trying to stop the immigration insanity currently going on, in particular the amnesty scheme, and are trying to oust a few of the more notable open borders advocates (i.e. Establishment Lackeys) in Congress. The problem is they have already surrendered the high ground to liberalism; that is they argue about the pros and cons of immigration within the propositional paradigm. I suspect many of the leaders in this organization know of the importance of race but they will not utter it. They constantly run from the label they fear most - Racist. The American Conservative, a paleo-con magazine, recently editorialized of the necessity of distancing the immigration reform movement from white nationalism. In other words they will try to out-liberal the liberals regarding which proposition is the most American while they hypocritically condemn neo-cons for doing likewise in certain other moral domains (like fag rights and imperialism).

The "king of open borders", Chris Cannon recently won the Republican primary for his seat in Congress. Team America put a lot of effort into beating him. Part of me wanted Cannon defeated but another part realized that we haven't awakened yet. Until our side is willing to say we are the White Race and we (blood, faith, culture) are worth defending we don't deserve to win since we will be winning due to sophistry and playing by the enemy's rules.

All this is not to say ideology is not important. It is, very much. The problem is we are facing an attack clearly intended to wipe us off the face of the earth and this must be addressed first. The defense of our race has to be a given amongst the intellectual leadership of our people. They must sunder themselves from the distorting influence which emits a narcotic fog throughout our people. After that ideas can be sorted out.

What is this thing called Judeo-Christianity?

2006-06-16T15:52:00.000-04:00

About a year ago was when I was first exposed to this movement called Kinism one of the things many of the Kinist bloggers talked about a lot was Judeo-Christianity. Up to that point I had a positive view of it, having uncritically accepted the notion that our culture and even religion were Judeo-Christian at their foundations. After all, every conservative opinion medium that was easily accessible sang the praises of our Judeo-Christian heritage. Could they all be wrong? It didn’t take long for me to see and agree with what the Kinists were saying about the ‘virtues’ of this amalgamation. Since I was already well aware that something was seriously wrong with the conservative political movement it should come as no surprise that that which was (and still is) its largest supporter was also diseased. I used to reflexively defend the Religious Right since they were opposed to much of the progressive ideals of liberalism, at least in word. I was thinking the thoughts the Establishment expected from those in the antithetical sphere of its dialectic charade. Liberals boldly propose new schemes, conservatives counter-propose something more palatable, and the masses ultimately receive a synthesis of the two.

There was a time when I thought the conservative variety of Christianity really was in opposition to this spiral of progress. It is not since it truly is JUDEO-christian. The oft-used moniker Judeo-xtian fits even better. When you look at the current state of the West today, and more importantly the White Race, you will see, if you are unafraid of the truth, that the institutional church is not only not working against our demise but has possibly become its most energetic cheerleader. Why is this, and what the heck IS Judeo-Christianity?

There are a few characteristics of it that I think are generally true. Within the following very important subjects Judeo-Christianity has made its position very clear. I consider the contemporary conservative/evangelical church and its many political organizations to be the soldiers making up the army known as Judeo-Christianity. These include such church groups as the Southern Baptist Convention, the Presbyterian Church of America and the more conservative varieties of the mainline Protestant and RC churches; such organizations as Focus on the Family and Campus Crusade for Christ; and such public figures as James Dobson, Pat Robertson, Jerry Fallwell, and Tim LaHaye; and such publications as World Magazine. What is the faith that binds them and motivates them? Judeo-Christianity.

Here are some of the key characteristics of it:

God’s Chosen People. Judeo-Christians first and foremost acknowledge that God’s Chosen are not those who He has elected from the beginning of time to share eternity with him but are those who claim to be the blood descendants of the Hebrews – modern day Jews. Modern day Jews, be they Orthodox, Reformed, Liberal, or as Atheistic as Madeline Murray O’Hare, have Judeo-Christians wrapped around their fingers. Judeo-Christians think God will curse those who oppose followers of the Talmud; a book exclusively for Jewry which claims God’s Son is boiling in excrement. If ever a group has been characterized by members who have committed the unpardonable sin – blaspheming the Holy Ghost – it is Jewry. Yet Judeo-Christians not only do not oppose Jewry, they think they walk on water. They even take them as their primary identity – Judeo. Authentic Christianity acknowledges that God’s Chosen people are the Elect; those He has chosen to save from damnation by his sovereign, and to us mysterious, will, through the sacrifice of his son.

Dominion. The Bible is clear that all is God’s and he expects his chosen people to take his revelation and apply it in the world. Judeo-Christians think that when Jesus says to render unto Caesar that which is Caesar’s, it means everything that Caesar claims is his. This is a cop out which allows Judeo-Christians to seemingly stay relevant to the fickle moods of the world. It is also an act of cowardice since Christians no longer have confront evil but can virtuously (in their own minds) surrender to it. If Caesar chooses to conscript your children into a war for imperialism Judeo-Christians will cower and say “Caesar calls” so we must render unto him. Authentic Christianity understands that since all is God’s then “that which is Caesar’s” is clear – nothing. Caesar exists to serve God and we are all under his dominion. There is a role for Government and that is to be obedient to God’s revelation and enforce His law. Judeo-Christian’s will deny this surrender of dominion but listen to how they always speak of obeying the ‘law’ – Caesar’s law that is. Good little Judeo-Christian John Ashcroft said he would enforce the law of the land when appointed Attorney General – this ‘law’ being Roe vs. Wade; not even a law based on how law is formulated in the United States much less a law in the mind of God. It is an abomination (like much of the law in the West today) but Judeo-Christians render unto Caesar whatever Caesar says.

Usury. This is a subset of dominion but deserves special mention. The entire pyramid of Western prosperity today is built upon usury – making money off of money. The Bible condemns it repeatedly and the Church did for the first 1500 years of its existence. Around the time of the Reformation, and picking up steam ever since, is the Church’s acceptance of this practice. The Church today is even one of its greatest practitioners through its ‘investments’ as well as its tortured biblical interpretations. It is commonplace to hear the Parable of the Talents used as a defense of usury when it is clear Jesus is condemning it, remaining consistent with his respect for his father’s law. Usury has been and is a destroyer of nations; it reaps where it does not sow, it is avaricious and feeds the beast known as capitalism – a modern antithesis to Marx’s communism. It has helped make the United States an empire that is now the greatest champion of the New World Order. To consider that the United States 150 years ago was probably the most Godly nation on earth and now it is probably the most wicked makes this all the more obvious. Productivity must come from work, real work, not through schemes.

Race. This area more than any other shows the sycophancy of Judeo-Christians to the Establishment. Jewry has schemed and is currently carrying out what can be called nothing other than Genocide of the White Race. This has been going on for a very long time but has accelerated dramatically since the world wars of the early 1900’s. The Church until at least the mid-1800’s was a strong opponent of Jewry in this area and at least a moderate opponent until the 1940’s. Since the 1960’s the Church has been in wholesale retreat and now accepts Jewry’s ‘religion’ as its own. The Evangelical Church threw in the towel once Jewry was able to destroy White people’s solidarity in what is badly labeled as the Civil Rights movement. Anywhere in the West today, if you cross Jewry, you end up marginalized at the least if not ruined. The gutless cowards of Judeo-Christianity have even jumped on the bandwagon and consider ‘racism’, that political weapon Jewry (notably Leon Trotsky) invented and has wielded like an axe, into a sin, maybe even THE sin. Go to any Christian blog and see which attracts more venom from its hosts – blasphemy or ‘racism’. Some of them even consider racism to be blasphemy. These folks are so clueless and craven they have convinced themselves that Jewish ideology intended to undermine White society is from the Bible.

Judeo-Christians know their place; in the religious realm filling the same role which respectable conservatives fill in the political – practical implementers of that which their master’s have granted them. They will take the leftovers of the real debate that the Establishment has already decided and make ‘Christianity’, Judeo-Christianity that is, fit into it. No wonder Kinists are hated by these frauds; we hold up a mirror to their pock-marked faces.

No doubt liberal Christianity is worse in many ways but for how long are we going to continue to accept “less worse” and the continued slide into degeneracy as evidenced by culture, race, and faith? Things are too bad to accept the lesser of two evils anymore. Christianity which is in thrall to Jewry is no Christianity at all.

With all this said, here is an attempt at a concise definition. Judeo-Christianity is a political and religious union which subordinates and perverts Christian (and especially White) interests to Jewish interests.

Amnesty Daze

2006-03-31T01:44:00.000-05:00

This is a rambling post, hence the title...

The news of the impending amnesty of millions of illegal aliens should be a surprise to no one who has figured out what America now is. Still, I am a bit dazed - not only by the indifference with which this story is met by the public - but by the sheer brazenness of our eternal enemy. The more our people yield, the more they are expected to yield again. It is one thing to read about the Stockholm syndrome in psychology class, quite another to see it played out at a national level repeatedly.

Yes all our establishment institutions are either controlled by or are obedient to our enemy but when will enough Whites wake up? Awareness didn't come to me without a good deal of searching and in the unfolding period of discovery that followed many things I held dear came crashing down. Is there enough initiative left in enough of our people to rediscover that which we know instinctively though we subordinate it to our egalitarian/nihilistic obedience training? I really don't know.

Another reason for the daze is that I find myself almost in a parallel universe as far as social interaction. The few 'intellectuals' I come in contact with completely buy into the fundamentals of liberalism and what is worse is that they refuse to even entertain any dissent. On Saint Patrick's Day I chatted with someone that the controlled media would call "conservative" or even "right wing". I've known him for quite a few years and before my awakening (started about 2 years back and is on-going) considered an ally on the issues of our day. I told him I'd love to move out of the Washington DC area for a number of reasons, one being the threat of terrorism to the capital of this nation-destroying empire. He responded that he was an "internationalist" and a "free trader". I said free trade is fine as long as labor isn't commoditized in the process. Since the people are the nation labor cannot be freely exchanged if the nation is to survive.

When I added that another motivation was the browning of our area through massive immigration he said immigration is less proportionately now than 100 years ago. When I suggested that there are multiple differences between then and now, notably racial, he had to just end the discussion. It was civil but violated our state religion and this respectable 'conservative' would not dare pollute his mind with such heresy. This is someone who writes for a widely read neocon magazine and newspaper plus books on occasion. Rationally I can see why he would want nothing to do with a discussion on race; for any neocon short of denouncing race, any mention of it that became public could and would force him to look for new employment and new social circles. It is also an affront to their deeply held faith that words trump blood. Intellectually it is craven.

Yet this person is typical of the establishment sycophants. They all refuse to state the obvious or to even investigate it - that race is not only an important issue but that it is THE issue that drives the seeming vagaries of history. It is possible that maybe I am overstating the case here but is it any wonder since it is the great unmentionable? If these participants in the Establishment's adversarial charade (Republicans vs. Democrats, neocons vs. liberals) were honest with each other one side would say to the other as Captain Von Trapp said to the Nazi commissar in The Sound of Music, "we both seem to be suffering from an appalling lack of curiosity".

The other people I come in contact with are fat, dumb, and happy; contented in their processes of seeming self-actualization. Many of these have already committed themselves to their voluntary extinction to atone for the 'sins' of our forefathers as described by our eloquent enemy. Why would they care about the future? I personally come into contact with very few folks who think outside the ideological plantation. The blogosphere is an exception but it is, for now, a ghetto. This virtual world seems the only place where a modicum of sanity and reality exists. Seems paradoxical.

An added point of interest for me that has brought this whole alien invasion home is my current search for work. I finished a consulting engagement in December and have yet to land a new gig since. Being between jobs for a few months is not unheard of and there are many factors involved such as business cycle, luck, fit, etc. Putting aside the conventional answers I have noticed a preponderance of Asian Indians in the consulting marketplace in every part of the chain: both as consultant competitors and as the head-hunters. I have worked with many Indians and have liked almost all of them but when you lose work to them in your own country due to uncontrolled immigration or work visa madness it becomes less abstract and very personal. As more Whites feel this same squeeze maybe then there will be a rejuvenation of our warrior spirit?

When our people see how other races treat us when we are in direct competition only an idiot or a coward would not wake up. One more personal anecdote. I was at Air Force basic training in 1984 (a fitting year). There were 40 men per unit, called a Flight. Of that group there were 35 whites and 5 blacks. Every morning we would assemble in a box formation of 5 by 8 to march to breakfast and later for lunch and dinner. There was an ordering to the formation with the tallest men being in the front and the right and the shortest to the left and rear. It was assumed that each man got into the same spot every time we got into formation (for simplicity) and generally that was the case. When we entered the cafeteria for meals one column went in at a time so there was a rule to rotate the starting column for each subsequent meal. That way each man would sometimes go in early, sometimes in the middle, sometimes late. Sounds fair right? Well guess what 4 of the 5 brothas (to his credit one of them did not) did? They would line up in the column that everyone knew would be first to go in for that meal and displace the whites who were normally in that slot. The brothas must have worked this out by some sort of collusion because they always acted in consort while the whites just passively went along so as not to cause dissension or it could be that most were oblivious. I don't know since we didn't talk about it. I noticed it and it bothered me a bit but I was just a very young adult at the time and I didn't want to make a stink at basic training. You want to keep your mouth shut and just make it through but that experience has made a lasting impression. I was definitely not racially aware at this time and was surprised these blacks didn't have the same concern for fairness that I and all the whites shared.

That story may seem silly but to me it encapsulates in microcosm our current fight for survival - brown folks taking, whites yielding. More white folks need to see the fantasy of equalitarianism dashed to bits by blacks and mestizos kicking sand in their faces. Seeing Mexicans angrily marching in our cities demanding anything is an affront but our people are still too weak due to the political HIV that has weakened us. The mestizos and blacks are just the opportunistic diseases of this immunity system failure.

This amnesty is just another result of that weakness. Will the antibodies kick in or is the patient already terminal? Either way, only the ultimate destruction of the virus will save us else the wave of diseases it invites will wash us away.

A Classic White Separatist Apologetic

2006-02-28T22:00:00.000-05:00

Being one of those bloggers who posts in spurts, I still enjoy surfing and reading other's thoughts. Some of the gems that I find are buried deep in discussion threads as opposed to being stand-alone posts. One in particular I came across recently I'll past here in full. It is from MajorityRights dot com. If you've never been there and you are interested in the plight of our people, you should. The site itself is a mixed bag as far as whether I believe it is valuable to the survival of the White Race but generally it is excellent. The host goes by the moniker "Guessedworker" and he is very fair minded and thick skinned. He allows many contributors who are not assets to our cause in my view. One is an IQ-fetishist who could care less about the White Race per se, but rather that the human IQ be maximized whether it be through Asians, Jews, or some mix. Another comes very close to Steve Sailer's "Citizenism"; again wanting to maximize the types of people who provide for a productive society irrespective of whether they are White or not. All the rest of the members, those who make the initial postings, are what I would consider White Nationalists of various stripes.

Now the post that follows is from one of the contributors who was responding within someone else's thread titled "Black Aggression". Here is the link:
http://majorityrights.com/index.php/weblog/comments/black_aggression/#comments.

JW Holliday's retort was to an anti-racist (i.e. an anti-White racist) labelled June Gordon (better named Jewn Gordon) who trolls there on occasion. It is a classic that should be, or at least something very close to it, a part of our apologetic arsenal. Here it is in italics:

If I may paraphrase an argument that Svigor often uses:-

Why do people like “June Gordon”, Tim Wise, the GNXPers, all non-white “Americans”, white liberals, Jews, etc. so very much want to live in the same nation as us “dumber-than-Asians, more-criminal-than-blacks, less-noble-than-Jews, less-hardworking-than-Hispanics, criminal white gentile Americans?”

If all we want is to be separate, then why can’t we have an amicable separation. Each side can have a good-sized, ecologically viable, pleasant and productive territory. We can have - with full freedom of speech and no media monopolization - a honest public discussion of the merits of homogeneity vs. diversity for each population group, and then give members of each group a choice between a homogenous national state, or the multiracial, diverse rump America.

Forget about the details for the moment, let us keep the issue crystal clear. Let us focus on the principle of the matter.

Why must these folks force us to live in the same nation as them? Assuming that everyone has free choice, and everyone has the option of a ecologically sound, pleasant state, then what’s the problem? Do they really love us so much, that they cannot live apart from us? What’s the fascination with living amongst us stupid, violent white gentile, racist Americans? You’d think that given how much blacks complain about white racism, that they’d be begging us to leave them be. Yet, it’s the other way around, white flight tries to flee from “people of color”, and the “people of color” keep on following the whites. No matter how much whites want to be separate (in practice, if not overtly), they are forced to be integrated.

Isn’t it pathological to want to live amongst people who you believe hate you and wish to do you harm? A large fraction of blacks think that whites intentionally infect their community with diseases, flood their community with drugs, discriminate against them, flooded the levees in New Orleans, etc. If that is the case, and whites are so viciously racist, then, why don’t blacks and others demand to be as far away from us as possible?

After all, if blacks really are as capable as whites, and if the only thing holding them back is white racism and the legacy of that racism in history, then, by golly, all they need to do is be separate from whites and they’ll build their all-black community into a “shining city on a hill.”

Why don’t racial liberals wish to help blacks be free of the racist white parasites tormenting these intelligent, peaceful, and noble men and women of color?

The rallying cry of the racial liberal should be: “freedom and self-determination for people of color! Get as far away from the racist white devil as possible.”

Or do they believe that without a white majority, any rump America would become Detroit or New Orleans?

And they believe that, given all the facts, and given free choice, the “white devils” will run away from the people they are allegedly tormenting as quickly as possible?
Posted by JW Holliday on Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 12:15 AM | #

Since most White Nationalists are better described as separatists than supremacists (the distinction of which is worthy of its own post) JW's logic pins our enemies completely. They have no retort other than their typical obfuscation or straw-man arguments. Why are we constantly being called evil and deemed worthy of genocide by our jewish dominated establishment when we are simply trying to live in peace in our own lands? Simply because the elite have deemed it necessary for progress (Liberals), profits (the rich gentiles), and supposed peace (Jewry). They all agree on the end state though their motivations vary between idealism, greed, and malice.

When the majority of Whites finally see and agree that we have a right to be LEFT ALONE if we chose, the current stagnant political situation could change and fast.

Let us hope and work in whatever ways we can to bring that about. Bravo JW.

Sale of the Century

2005-12-22T10:41:00.000-05:00

There is an old saying that you should be careful of what you wish for because you may actually get it. The Twentieth Century had many things which distinguished it, most notably change and death, and threaded throughout its salient moments was something which I believe will become clearer and clearer as more time passes. Amongst all the other events this may have been the most pivotal. And, what was this? It was the currying of favor by the White Nations, of a small but very influential group, to give them an edge in their competition against other White Nations. Once this group was bought, the winners of the auction ‘won’ their conflicts but in so doing they sold their souls, and are right now in their death throes because of the bargain. I call it the sale of the century but it may have been the swindle of the ages.

At the beginning of the 20th Century, the White Race was ascendant, though undoubtedly by some very questionable means. Over 30% of the world’s population was white and the chasm of technology between the white world and non-white world was immense. Any conflict between the two was virtually a foregone conclusion. Just about all the land of the world was directly under the authority of white governments. Whites knew who they were and what it took to protect themselves, though often in short-sighted ways. What was generally in contention was the power distribution within the white world.

This competition was the genesis of our current death spiral for it did two things: first it made the major white nations desirous of empire to maintain parity with whoever was the greatest at the time; second it caused the white nations to look for anything from which to gain an edge. Imperialism made us an affront to the many peoples of the world who were not keen on being subjects of foreigners, it transferred enormous wealth and knowledge to them, allowing them to grow in ways they never could have on their own, and it made our people supremacists since we then had to rule over the brown world and ‘civilize the savage’. Imperialism is unhealthy to the master and the serf and it destroys diversity and localism.

The search for an edge caused white nations to lose sight of what got them to where they were - their genetic endowment, the order which issues from it, and the resultant culture. Since they now had to win at all costs against fellow Whites every little bit helped. Within most white nations were a particular people with well known talents in certain areas: very well motivated, cunning, eloquent, and powerful. Over the centuries this nation within nations honed the skills necessary for their survival in areas deemed inappropriate, immoral, and/or illegal for Whites. Since earlier white rulers saw the danger of this nation, they segregated them into certain areas and limited them to certain activities. In spite of or because of this they got stronger. By the start of the century they dominated the international trade in money (banking) as well as information dissemination (the media). This group has both thrived within and despised its hosts at the same time. The earlier wisdom of our leaders in keeping them on a very short leash was about to be abandoned.

Their first attempt to use their power was during a conflict between a white, Christian nation – Russia, which lorded over a multi-racial empire - and one of the first non-white countries to have a chance at resistance – Japan, which was a completely homogeneous nation. The Russo-Japanese War of 1904-05 showed the weakness of the Russian Empire and the strength of the Japanese for sure. It also showed where the Other’s loyalties and enmities lay. The richest money changer in the USA (Jacob Schiff) provided enormous capital to Japan. Also, the Others fomented revolution in Russia in 1905. Russia may have lost anyway but the Others contributed greatly to this outcome. Russia’s revealed weakness enhanced both Germany’s ambitions in Europe as well as further Japanese expansion in the East, both of which had profound implications later in the century.

At this point in history, the Others were dominant in Germany. Their ideological movements were gaining momentum under the façade of progress and reason, when these movements were and are neither. Anthropology (Franz Boas), Psychology (Sigmund Freud), Sociology (Max Horkheimer), and other fields of study were all in their early stages of corruption: to serve the Others political purposes. Popular institutions such as entertainment and news were also under their influence, if not control, as well as the fountain of capitalist/industrialist economics: money. Their primary base of operations was initially Germany though later it was to become the USA.

With the defeat of Russia it became clear to the white nations that these Others were an important ally to gain, in their various quests for empire. In the buildup to the Great War, this was most apparent. The biggest enemy of the Others was still Russia, with her White Christian Tsar who still treated the Others the way White Christian leaders had in the past – as seditious foreigners. They were about to put him and all of his people under their wrath. As the powers of Europe schemed on how to deal with the upcoming international conflict, the Others initiated activity for the annihilation of the White Race, or so it appears in hindsight. The Others were very pro-German in the beginning of the war and maybe would have stayed so if the first part of their plan had not worked – a takeover of Russia. Their revolution in Russia, again in the midst of the war (just as in 1905), this time worked. They were able to convince the poor Christian peasants and workers that it was a proletariat revolution when its advocates were the quintessential bourgeoisie. The Others ‘capitalist’ money even paid for this anti-capitalist (supposedly) revolution. The Others paid with their wealth gained from milking the working man dry and only asked that this working man contribute with his own life. When the Others murdered the Tsar and his family a metaphor for the whole century was set – the death of Whites at the hand or by the cunning word of the Others. Once Russia was toppled and the Other’s greatest enemy became their greatest friend, now what was in their best interests? If one were to suspect a latent loyalty to Germany for being their most gracious hosts was to sustain them think again. The auction was to begin.

No one even proposes that they couldn’t be bought. That was a given since it has characterized them throughout history and is part of the reason they are almost universally reviled, even when they control virtually every organ of public opinion. The question wasn’t whether they could be bought but who would come up with the sweetest offer. Once their affections were obtained their ‘services’ would be rendered. In 1916 and 1917 as Russia plummeted, Germany and Britain began a vigorous courtship of her ‘ladyship’. A new homeland was the centerpiece of any deal. Kicked out of wherever they had dwelled in the past they now pulled a whopper, even for them. These Others now assumed the identity of a people they normatively had no connection to. Whereas they originated from central Asia, they claimed title to land of people from another race and faith. The Semitic people (descendants of Shem) of the Middle East who still followed the Old Testament are typically what people think of as Jews, when in fact these people are a small minority of ‘Jewry’. The people who asked that the land of the Hebrews be given to them, were Hebrew neither by birth nor adoption. Talmudic Khazars were now the people who were considered Jewry and the Semitic people who lived there (mostly Muslims and Christians) be damned.

Germany’s biggest hurdle in winning Jewry’s favor was her ally, the Ottoman Empire, who though they were Turkish and much closer related by blood to the Khazars than to the Arabs (real Semites) who lived there, were not willing to stir dissension in their empire with such a dramatic rearrangement. Germany was stuck. She could talk about how good she’d been to Jewry and promise to try harder but that wasn’t good enough. Britain wasn’t hamstrung by the Ottomans since they were at war and gladly seized at the opportunity to carve up the empire of an enemy and win the favor of an important power in one blow. The Jew bankers who lived in New York and London were won over and Theodore Herzl’s vision of a new homeland in Palestine became a firm commitment by Britain with the announcement of the Balfour Declaration in 1917. Britain expected repayment and Jewry did not disappoint.

The Jewish media in America went from being pro-German or neutral to joining arms with President Wilson in wanting to make the world safe for democracy. "Death to the Huns" was the new cry. The provocation started, now all that was needed were a few big events to stir American opinion away from isolationism. Even before this, in 1915, the passenger ship the Lusitania was sunk by German submarines but Jewry was still pro-German then so the media didn’t fan the flames of war so much. That this passenger ship was carrying munitions should have made the leaders of Britain and the USA just as culpable for murder as the Germans but such is not the case. The loopy Zimmermann telegram, in early 1917, which was an attempt by Germany to get Mexico to invade the USA, was the final event to grease the skids of war. Probably not coincidentally the British intercepted the telegram and forwarded it to the USA. It was laughably bad diplomacy but certainly not to be taken seriously unless the USA was looking for an excuse to go to war. Either Zimmermann was an idiot, since Mexico could have been conquered by one American division, or he was a double agent. I have not heard that argued but I find it hard to believe he was so dumb. Either way, Wilson and the British and Jewry got their way, and the US Congress declared war in April 1917.

If this had not happened, the German offensive of 1918, which started very strongly, may have ended the war in a German victory. The French and Brits were spent but right at that critical point the Americans came with fresh troops and supplies. The Allied counter offensive broke the spirit of the German Army, especially when coupled with internal dissension egged on by you guessed it, Jewry. Germany, Jewry’s greatest friend in the world was stabbed in the back. The unprecedented Treaty of Versailles was a fitting epitaph to the awful war, since it planted the seeds for the next one.

In the aftermath of the Great War the next phase of the Sale of the Century begins. Jewry was in ascension but still in an intermediate position. The White Goyim were still too strong. The Soviet Union became Jewry personified. It was their creation from top to bottom, with a handful of useful idiots like Lenin (his own term by the way) who was only half-Jew to make the movement seem less kosher. Millions of White Gentiles to impoverish, brainwash, torture, and kill; thought crimes to institute, even the death penalty for ‘anti-semitism’. How can one be anti-semitic to a Khazar? Who needs to wait for a messiah when there was the Soviet Union?

On the other hand, the Brits did promise a homeland. This was the Jewish dilemma Churchill wrote about in his essay about Zionism and Bolshevism struggling for the loyalties of Jewry. Unfortunately Churchill wanted to win the Jews to his side by hoping that Zionism would be their true love instead of Bolshevism. What he failed to see is that the Jews could, at that time, still love both. Churchill had created a false dichotomy.

Given the treachery against Germany, the onerous ‘peace’ treaty, and the worldwide economic depression, the rise of Nazism shouldn’t be too surprising. Its rise and its casting down of the ruinous ‘culture’ of the decadent bourgeois Weimar Republic created a new bogeyman for Jewry. It had been part of a political trinity of Jewry; the Soviet Union was Jewry at thought, the United States was Jewry at ‘work’, the Weimar Republic was Jewry at play. They were not too happy that the German people rose up against them. The Jews, for the first time in a long time were getting a taste of their own medicine. While millions of Ukrainians were starving to death at the hands of Jewish Bolshevism in the Soviet Union, the fact that Germans passed some restrictions on their own Jews was worthy of a declaration of war by international Jewry (centered in New York) against Germany in 1933. Ukrainians can starve by the millions, at Jew hands, but there better not be one Jew denied a civil service position in a nation that had just faced one of the greatest betrayals in history. Even though Germany was struggling to right herself economically Jews wanted her starved. They initiated a worldwide economic boycott of German goods through their control of markets and demonization of the German people through all their propaganda channels.

That was maybe the only time in the 20th Century when Jewry turned the thumb screws and the Goyim didn’t give in but instead fought back. Germany didn’t become less anti-Jewish as Jewry expected but more so. The Nuremberg Laws passed in 1935 but even they didn’t contain the death penalty for anti-whiteism the way Jewry’s Soviet Union killed their dissenters for thought crimes against the real Master Race.

Jewry was now swinging between the Soviet Union and Anglo-America as served its interests. Germany was rising again and trying to reclaim much that was lost because of the treason in the Great War; even going further as in the absorption of Austria and Czechoslovakia. Danzig had been Germany’s and kept her territory in East Prussia from being joined with the rest. Poland did not give in since she had a commitment from both Britain and France, themselves undergirded by warmongering Jewry, to defend her. Great Britain and France started the Second World War when Germany invaded Poland. Jewry had won again; Millions more of the Goyim were to die. Out of the scores of millions killed during this useless war, all that we are expected to remember now are the couple million (possibly) Jews who died and this situation is even copyrighted – THE Holocaust. EVERYTHING in our history is subordinate to it and them. To even question how many were killed and how is a crime in much of the ‘free’ West today. Jews were instrumental in the creation of the Atom Bomb though they (Oppenheimer, Teller, etc.) were disappointed when Germany surrendered before it could be dropped on her cities. They were further disappointed when it was dropped on the Japanese since they did not want it either to hurt the Japanese or help the Americans, only to punish uppity Germany.

With Germany defeated the next phase of the sale begins. Now the international struggle revolved around the Soviet Union vs. the USA, probably the two most philo-semitic (Jewish friendly) countries in the world. Of course they were both empires, for to be anything else is incompatible with Jewry’s schemes for white nations. Given the freedoms enjoyed in the USA most of Jewry could maintain their dual ‘loyalties’ when they lived in the USA. Some, like the Rosenbergs, went too far even for the weak and simple Goyim. Most were smart enough to stand on, but not cross the line. They helped ‘interpret’ most of our modern law so they certainly know how to use it. The change in this situation occurred as the result of the conflict between Israel and the Arabs. The USA became Israel’s chief benefactor, inheriting the mantle from the UK (since she was spent fighting for Jewry in two world wars), after WWII, and the Soviets naturally aligned with Israel’s foes. With Jews becoming more effective at making the USA a new Weimar Republic and the Soviets aligning with the Arabs the Jews told Stalin to take a hike. Not surprisingly Stalin didn’t like this too much so the Soviet Union started to do things that were ‘anti-semitic’; such as removing the death penalty for anti-semitism. Oh the horrors. But in ‘winning’ this latest round of bidding, the American political process was ruined, for when many of the Jews, like Irving Kristol, turned from Stalin they all of a sudden became ‘conservatives’ – neo-conservative that is. Jews had long been dominant in the USA’s ‘leftist’ political party, the Democrats, (being darlings since at least Wilson and forward) and now they started the takeover of the ‘rightist’ party, the Republicans. In the span of a generation they turned both political parties into anti-white organizations, already having poisoned the popular culture and educational system. There is in USA, as in all the white world, no voice for us in the established order. We Whites are now outsiders in our own lands.

The current jew schemes center around destroying the White Race with the end state seemingly being the New World Order (the implementation of a worldwide managerial state with the Chosen Ones as those managers). Open borders, socialism, egalitarianism, pathologizing whiteness through all mainstream media outlets, civil rights, feminism, faggotry, war-mongering, imperialism are supported by all our jew-dominated institutions. These are the fruits of Jewry. A few American patriots in the 20th Century like Henry Ford and Charles Lindbergh saw this and warned our people but there were too many race traitors and toadies around to stem the tide. Now there are no patriots in the public sphere. They have been purged as though the 1st Amendment were meaningless, which it essentially is. Many white people who have awakened to the threat to our people want to win the latest phase in this perpetual auction but IT is the one thing we should pay NOT to take. With their right hand they will ‘help’ us even as they grasp a dagger in their left. History shows that when we win their favor we lose. It is poisonous and we must anathematize it and those who serve it if we wish for ourselves and other free peoples to survive.

The White Race is now spiraling towards oblivion, not only in numbers but, even worse, in attitude and Jewry loves this. Its public mouthpieces can barely contain either their elation at our continued slide, nor their fury when any (even two little girls) defy them. This will not change as long as we continue to subordinate ourselves to this ruthless, crafty, and hostile foreign race.

How to cleave ourselves from them can eventually be resolved once enough of us realize that it must be done. To say these things makes one a heretic to our state religion and few are yet willing to face the Inquisition.

Wherever You Turn

2005-12-13T15:11:00.000-05:00

Before pitching it in our fireplace, to at least do some good, I made a note of an interesting snippet out of the Wall Street Journal. A realtor from Arkansas forwarded some property listings along with some other material praising that region as a great place to live. The photocopy of the WSJ article (written by Jeff Opdyke) had many nice things to say about the area and then it lowered the boom – THERE IS NOT ENOUGH DIVERSITY IN THE REGION. Translation – “There are too many Whites around. What must be done to solve this problem?” It cited a statistic that ‘only’ 1.9% of the population is non-white. I know things are crazy regarding multiculturalism and the anti-white hatred that masquerades as anti-racism. I further know that the WSJ is pure neocon (Jews who used to be Marxist until the US out-bid Stalin for their support), money-worshipping rag, but what the hell does lack of “diversity” have to do with an article on real estate? For any sane person isn’t the opposite true; that the LESS diverse an area is the better?

Is everything now being done in code? Was the article’s backhand against Whites really the only PC way to get the news across? ‘Wink, wink, “We know we shouldn’t be saying this but there are very few colored peoples in this area but we can only say it by making it sound like a bad thing”, giggle’. Doubtful, since the WSJ wants to demonize whiteness the same way all organized Jewry does. Orthodox/Reformed/Atheist, Left/Right, Republican/Democratic; they all agree on that. They would have only said the lack of ‘diversity’ was a bad thing because they meant it. Still, maybe the Goyim aren’t as dumb as we seem and we are using the Chosen People’s propaganda to stay informed, regardless of their sinister intentions. Again, doubtful. The Goyim have largely been beaten down and only see what they are supposed to see and say what they are supposed to say. We seem to have no fight left. That tidbit was there and its brazen inclusion is evidence of our own humiliation and defeat. We must now avert our gaze and accept our disenfranchisement from that which our forefathers built. “Who’re you looking at BOY?” they ask and we look down.

When the assertion was made that the number of Whites was too high and other, preferred, races too low I don’t recall seeing any argument as to why this is a bad thing. As silly as the justifications always are, at least when they are attempted there is some facade of rationality but we are in the age of fundamentalist anti-white hatred. Statements such as these are now just made like mantras – a Rosary for the slaves of the Master Race as we kiss their ring. Is it really now this Pavlovian - this repetition of platitudes without critical reflection? It amazes me the way the average modern looks down at medieval folks as superstitious when we have it over them in spades (pun intended) in that area. We regularly nod our heads in agreement at the most ludicrous, counter-intuitive and surreal declarations of bogus morality and think we are progressive. Bloodletting was less bad for us than Jewry’s philosophies, and was not built on malice.

If white-hating propaganda now shows up during a search for a home, what’s next – the weather report?

Preparing To Take the Plunge

2005-11-17T13:10:00.000-05:00

It has been little over 6 months since I came to the conclusion that I had to make a change for myself and family as far as our life model goes. There has, in recent years been a slowly welling realization that something is not right in the prosperity I, and many of my people, are now enjoying. I am currently doing better than ever financially. We have a nice house in the suburbs of Washington DC with a decent plot of land; we have no debt except for our home mortgage; my income has been very respectable for the norms of this region; we lack neither food, nor clothing; we are on friendly terms with our neighbors and belong to a friendly, perfectly respectable church. For all these things, and even more importantly the health and wellness of my wife, children and me, I praise God. This should be enough to make any man a conservative – to want to maintain the status quo, right?

As much as I appreciate what we have, I believe the Lord has spoken to me through his Word (and in turn through many of his prophets here on earth) that our current prosperity is not to his liking. Our children see us “going to Church” on Sunday but living just as the pagans live, with God invisible or in a, very little, box. My children know Dad “goes to work” to pay for our needs and wants. When we need food we “go to the store” and there it is on the shelf. When we need money we “go to the bank”. Life seems not to be something we are experiencing but something we are watching pass us by. No wonder children abandon their parent’s lives; they are devoid of meaning. This whole transformation in my thinking gained great momentum based on my wife’s research on healthy eating. It has led us to look to the Bible for guidance on eating and on living – a guidance that is virtually ignored by the contemporary Church. In parallel with her research on food I continued to delve into socio-economic and political issues and eventually saw the crystal clear truth – that our whole contemporary situation, and much of our history is a sham. The world has been and is about an elite group of people obtaining, maintaining, and growing their wealth, fame, and power at the expense of any who are in their way. I suspect most people would acknowledge this point in the general sense but are unwilling to see the extent to which its truth makes our existence in this model untenable. The thread that was sticking up on a few issues I have pulled on and pulled on until the whole ‘garment’ is a pile of garbage. This whole issue I have touched on in other posts as have many minds greater than mine and though it deserves much greater discussion I will not do so here. I merely wanted to set that as a backdrop for why I, and maybe you, should consider being a new generation of pioneers.

What is the “model” I just referred to, this model that is untenable and we should consider leaving? It is the current Standard American Lifestyle. David, at his blog Covenant Corner recently captured it in a nutshell:

“The home has become a place consisting solely of consumerism. Because no one in the home makes whole goods, the family is made up purely of consumers. Workers go out away from the home to work and gain the financial ability to buy (consume) goods and services. Rather than being a place of industry, artistic expression and production, the home has become a place of idleness, boredom, and often times discontent.”

There is an economy to the world that this lifestyle is mocking; an economy that says you must produce to survive, REALLY produce, not sit at a desk, attend meetings, make loans, litigate, legislate, or otherwise just reshuffle the deck that our betters have created. How many people in America are real producers anymore? They are becoming less and less and as their numbers shrink their yoke is made heavier by the consuming classes who have the faux-power the establishment now shrewdly grants. Many forward thinking and Godly people have expressed this same truth. We Americans are sitting atop a worldwide economic plantation that is exploiting and raping the truly productive here and abroad. Our natural wonders, as well as our own bodies, minds, and spirits are ravaged by the current paradigm. How we (Americans) are still able to stay atop I don’t know yet. I have read bits and pieces that make sense but I have not been able to tie it together yet. But acknowledging that America is now on top of the world should not blind us into thinking that this will last. The world is a very competitive place and there are many well motivated and successful people groups that are rising fast (China and India being notable). Some establishment lackeys continue to blather about a rising tide lifting all boats. I don’t see this as being the case. Why will these competitors want to continue to shine our shoes when they are harder working, smarter, and tougher than we are? They won’t.

Most American farmers are now hirelings to corporate giants like Archer Daniels Midland, Cargill, Monsanto, Tyson, etc. The farmer is the serf producing an undifferentiated commodity that then relies on the ‘value added’ supplements provided by the corporation, be they hormones/steroids, chemicals, economies of scale, ‘efficiency’, seed stock, name recognition, and/or slick ads. The farmer must toe the company line as Massa commands. Massa makes the bucks and pulls the strings; farmer does the work. The situation is just like the movie A Bug’s Life whereby our farmers are the Ants and Massa is the Grasshopper, only our farmers don’t see this – at least most of them don’t. Renegades like Joel Salatin (Polyface Farm), Lynn Miller (Small Farmers Journal), and the folks at Acres USA, to name just a few, are out there but they are greatly outnumbered and outgunned. They emphasize the farmer (or any producer) as free and artisanal, directly dealing with his customer, and cutting out the parasitic and enslaving middle man. Is the tide turning? I don’t know but we can make a difference.

Though, these are by no means exhaustive explanations as to “why” I think leaving the Standard American Life is prudent they are seed-thoughts to motivate the change. If you were to conclude that a change is desirable, maybe even necessary, then what? I have been investigating this for only a few months now so my current thoughts may still change a bit but here’s where I am at right now. This is not ‘advice’, only my germinating plans.

Be Productive. Engage in enterprises where something raw is transformed into something directly usable. There are many options here: food production (crops, orchards, dairy, meats, etc.), animal by-products (leather, wool, etc.), clothing production, wood-crafting, blacksmithing, and many others. If/when things turn down in the macro-economy these skills will be in demand, not only so that we produce for our own families, but also produce things people will really need.

Be Diverse. Enterprises must have symbiosis; that is, multiple activities need to be undertaken that collectively are more productive and efficient, than if they were done alone. For example, beekeeping and orchards are better together than by themselves, since each benefits from the other. Diversity also is more interesting and more adaptable to changing market conditions than specialization, such as only raising beef cows.

Emphasize Sustainability. Building something and emphasizing methods that will last is important in several ways. First, we are being good stewards of the domain God has blessed us with: we are being true to him. Second, we are not negatively impacting our neighbors with externalities (those side effects that others have to pay for due to our sloth or greed): we are being true to our fellow man. Third, sustainability involves pulling our children directly into the production process, as early as makes sense, so that they inherit it and ultimately improve upon it: we are being true to our posterity.

Be Flexible. Whatever I end up doing will initially be based on my best guesses and intuition. Though this may provide a decent starting point, it will no doubt require correction as failures occur and experience is gained. One of things that strikes me about people who live off the land is how adaptable they are, since nature can be cruel and very unpredictable. We must learn to adjust as is required.

Be Communitarian. Just like a diverse operation helps to ensure success, being part of a healthy community does as well. It is the ultimate insurance policy since a good community should be there when catastrophe strikes. We cannot, alone, deal with the worst that may hit us in this fallen world. The virtual insurance, normative today, that has outsourced community to extremely rich and powerful outsiders is a poor (though sometimes needed) substitute. Community not only provides for these practical needs but also provides much of the richness to life and will continue to be rewoven through intermarriage.

With all those concepts in mind where I am currently leaning is towards a home centered on a wood-working enterprise. Preferable is sufficient land with timber to harvest, sustainably, this wood and use it to make furniture and other products for the home, barter, and sale. In addition to this we would free-range chickens, for meat and also raise our own eggs. For milk I would prefer goats though my wife prefers a cow but we’d end up with one or the other. The other things I’d like to do include modest orchards for apples and beekeeping. Pickling will be a must along with other creative types of fermentation to deal with the cycles of natural production. I’m hoping my daughters would eventually develop the skill to make clothing. There are many possibilities, especially for secondary activities.

Lynn Miller emphasizes getting ‘off the grid’ as much as possible. That is, becoming independent of non-sustainable inputs, which come from outside the community and can only be obtained with cash. I believe this is a good objective to strive towards but in the short term I know I would use electricity as well as some petrol. I strive to reduce the amount we use but not elimination; I have too many other things to learn without that as well.

There are still a lot of things to work out but I am aspiring to make a move within the next year or so. Caution and ignorance are being replaced by urgency and knowledge.

If you are contemplating anything similar please let me know your thoughts.

Survival Strategy Thoughts for Whites

2005-10-18T13:32:00.000-04:00

As I’ve become more racially conscious as a White man in the past few years I have seen a lot of info showing why we need to wake up. There is so much of it to blow away even the most skeptical field hand on the PC plantation – that is if they are ever exposed to it. Last night I heard on CSPAN another in a long string of outrages: a black leader (a college professor no less) literally called to his audience, with their applauding approval, for the worldwide extermination of all whites. Listen to this White folk – that is the beating heart of blackness in America. Yes, it is asinine but that’s what a very large number of their ‘intellectuals’ say. One has to look for this stuff now – it won’t find you. The mainstream media will not allow it. Once we clearly see there is a problem then what? This is the area where there is a vast desert of nothingness. At least I haven’t found much. What I’m talking about here isn’t advice like, “get the hell out of that ghetto”, or “sue the SPLC”; it’s not that things like that don’t often need to happen but they are band aids. We need a strategy; an overarching set of objectives and a means to get there. The ‘reasonableness’ of these steps must be measured in terms of what is at stake. If something proposed is ‘unreasonable’ but the alternative is our destruction then I say let’s be unreasonable. Here is a brief stab at some of the things I think we need to do. I hope to come across, or maybe even initiate here, more discussion on what needs to be done by White Nationalists and Kinists to try and save our people from genocide. Any other White folk who are willing to act for our people are also welcome even as they seek to make sense of our modern madness. Committed anti-racists need to be made to pay for their ride or sent to the oblivion they so richly deserve.

A couple acronyms I use are CP and CP2. CP stands for the Chosen People. They are disproportionately Jewish but not exclusively so. There are some Jews that oppose this but they are a very small number of influential Jews. Whites who have intermarried with Jews or otherwise been judaized are also included. This is a rich and powerful elite that pulls the strings of the world today. They are advocates for and leaders of the New World Order. CP2 are the Chosen People’s Chosen People. These are the people groups that are now on all the check boxes and preferred lists and are used as the foot soldiers in decimating White Nations around the world. The CP NEVER does its own fighting. Didn’t do it in WWI, WWII or any of the other imperial adventures they initiated - our people did. Our people died at their whim and we have been repaid by a treachery that would shake the world if the dirt craved justice. In the US, the CP2 are most notably Black and Mestizo. In Europe Arabs and Turks are more common. The CP2 the CP uses is dependent on the circumstances.

Militarize our youth. The greatest threat we face is the lobotomization and castration of our children. They are taught not to think, not to love their own, and not to grow up. That way they fail not only to pick up the torch of the generation before them but to be an extended burden on them also. To this point I have tried to raise my own kids with a healthy respect for people of other groups but with almost no education in the differences and how these differences make us incompatible as fellow citizens. Our children, as was I, are way too soft, way too prosperous. All other groups have gangs of brats (young and old) who take what they want and believe the CP propaganda that all their problems are the fault of Whites. When the CP2 don’t get what they want they have tantrums like the children they are in our (to them) alien culture. They do what they have always done: rape, murder, looting, rioting. When this stops they revert to their normative, parasitic indolence. In the future, when they come in their mobs to bring mayhem to our communities (like they recently did in Toledo) we need to respond with overwhelming force, sending them to route. They only respect violence. Charity and mercy on our part is spat upon by them. Our youth must be organized for their own self defense and in defense of their turf. I would hope this type of organization doesn’t take on the flavor of a CP2 gang – hopefully more in line with a Boys Scout-type group that also is schooled in racial awareness and martial arts.

Separate. The more I see of the parasitic relationship between CP2 and us the more I can no longer accept them in general. I accept them as a free and independent people, in their own nations, but not as our burden. This dysfunctional relationship must end; it is killing us as the CP want. In the long term either we must be amalgamated into the disparate races we have allowed into our homelands or separate. In an earlier age with racially restricted immigration assimilation was possible without dramatically altering us. Since the seeds of the anti-racial 1965 Immigration Reform Act have blossomed in force assimilation now equals genocide. Having separate races with dramatically different aptitudes in a socialistic state is untenable for long making the multicultural state a lie. An assimilating melting pot (e pluribus unum) or racial nations are the only options. More and more Whites have agreed to drink the genetic Kool-Aid of miscegenation or sterility. This is essential if the CP's plan is to work.

No longer feed the Beast. Now that the CP run the show, the prosperity our people created is used as bait to attract our own executioners. This Beast only exists because we work for it, pay taxes to it, fight and die for it. It is madness. As best as possible we need to leave it, oppose it, condemn it, shun it. Let the CP who coo lies from their forked tongues hold its festering putrescence up. Then maybe CP2 will start seeing who the real enemy is. We created something to behold and it has been ruined, yet even in its ruination it needs us. It can’t live without us. The CP2 are, normatively, too dumb to see that once we are gone, it will collapse, and along with it the Western ‘prosperity’ it spawns. The CP know this perfectly well. That’s why CP2 are so useful; they do CPs dirty work for them. We MUST find a way to let it die. The only reason we are in such straits is because of our own prosperity. We create prosperity (albeit much of it is ungodly) that attracts the chaff of less successful peoples. MC says they are interchangeable with us and they aren’t. Lash a team of yorkies to a sled and try to win the Iditarod. That's more likely than maintaining a White Country with 3rd Worlders.

Stop imperialism. This is especially problematic with our do-gooder mentality. We want to help the CP2 because they are in such pitiful circumstances by our standards when left to their own. We want to lift them up; make them like us. How noble. We give them shots, teach them our language, our techniques, give them ‘aid’, their populations boom in a Malthusian way, and their squalor is simply reconstituted in cities instead of villages, their violence with gun instead of spear, their garb of robe is replaced with suit. Nothing has changed except the worst of the West (exploitative welfare/warfare capitalism) has replaced their best (simple agrarianism). Our best (our genes) is replaced with their worst (their genes). It’s a lose/lose for everyone except the CP. Third World populations would have never boomed without western imperialism. They can only be maintained with western imperialism. The 3rd World hates us even as they probably realize we are their drug. Without us their population would plummet but they would then have their precious freedom. We have a wolf by the ears – they have a perpetual teat to suckle from. It’s a charade that must be ended soon to bring things more into their natural state.

Return to Work. Of all the actions I list this one is the hardest. The others are really pretty easy. This one takes much more fortitude and creativity. Whites have become fat on top of the world economic plantation. We have to learn to really work again: digging ditches, building our own homes, plowing fields. The days of being overpaid paper pushers in the CPs faux economy are doomed to end one way or the other; better by our own choice than the inevitable collapse. Many Christian Agrarianists nobly pursue this goal while purposely avoiding the other, more ‘racist’, ones. Do they really think this would work in the middle of Zimbabwe? If they do they are fools. Given the artificially high CP2 populations, as White largesse is reduced, CP2 will go after the productive by force. They will be unable to sustain themselves here just like they haven’t in Zimbabwe, as Whites have been killed and driven off. For a season their lusts will be appeased with stealing and murdering from the productive. To them the Goose is only good for a gluttonous feast not for her perpetual golden eggs. The Amish are an admirable people but their pacifism can only work in the context of an otherwise productive society. If they were surrounded by destitution how long would it be before the downtrodden resorted to plunder for survival?

Get Real. The world is, has been, and always will be a dangerous place. Many people groups are only kept from killing outsiders by the constant diligence of the potential victim. This is not to justify imperial aggression but it does justify violent defense. We must constantly remind ourselves that our existence is precarious and can only be maintained with much effort.

I’m sure others have better ideas than this but all I know is something that takes on many of these areas needs to happen and soon.

Bush's Legion

2005-10-14T14:21:00.000-04:00

Now that Bush has nominated Harriet Miers as the latest Associate Justice to the Supreme Court, and she is revealed as both a mediocre intellect and a leftist, what does the Conservative Establishment want? To be mollified, to have their wounded egos appeased, to be reminded of how they need to trust El Presidente. It was already clear what Bush was not, a Conservative – at least in the best sense of the label, but it is now also abundantly clear what they are as well - pathetic. Bush’s Amen Corner in the blogosphere is circling the wagons around their guy. They “trust” him you see. Bush assured conservatives that he desired Justices like Scalia and Thomas. Roberts and Miers are to Scalia and Thomas as Tiny Tim is to Tom Jones. It is so patently false, based on the evidence at hand, and clearly reveals Bush for what he is, a puppet of the Liberal Establishment, as to clearly raise the specter of wholesale abandonment by his scorned base. But most (maybe all) the leaders of his base prove, so far, that they primarily crave access to power and the childish desire of being associated with a winner, therefore there will be no wholesale abandonment of the Compassionate Conservative. This could have been, and might still be if the foot soldiers abandon their ‘leaders’, a watershed moment of realignment within American polity. I actually thought the Miers nomination was a good thing because it was Bush unveiled, a hideous corpse with a ghoulish smile, with no adulteration; Skull and Bones in the flesh. This would wake people up. Maybe it will. Maybe a few more marginal partisans are seeing the truth of the betrayal and a critical mass has been reached. If it has it is certainly unseen right now.

Lawrence Auster posted a discussion he had with a pro-Bush blogger who was initially upset but was quickly brought back to the fold by Republican operatives. This loyalist said it was more important to rally around Bush so that the Republicans retained control of the Government. Why - because the Democrats are ‘worse’. Under this model of supposed pragmatism, and it is the model the Republicans have followed for years, the Republicans have to be just a little less worse than the Donkeys. What most don’t see is that these two groups are actors in a grander play, wholly in cooperation at the strategic level, of implementing ‘progress’ in America. Unless we are explicitly ‘ideological’ on some things (for example following the Constitution) we will always be moving to the Left as a society. The Donkey’s part is to initiate progressive ideas in the political sphere; the Elephant’s part is to implement them ‘practically’. The Donkey will typically lose, because most people (White’s at least) don’t want what Leftists call progress, and the Elephant wins because most voters still buy this con. Leftism can’t be beaten by this worthless ‘conservatism’ of the Republicans, which is only watered down liberalism, but by a red-blooded counter-ideology which is just as active on the Right as liberalism is on the Left. For a long time National Review and many others have argued that conservatism is non-ideological, and maybe it is if using Burke and Kirk as examples since in their time there was still a lot to conserve and ideology was a dangerous concept that takes one away from the status quo. Non-ideology doesn’t cut it any more. We have strayed too far from what I would call a state of natural liberty. In my mind natural liberty is best described by a proper functioning of the law as described by Bastiat in his famous essay of the same name.

More and more people seem to be seeing that what is needed is not conservation by yelling “stop” to the march of liberalism but a dramatic, even revolutionary, transformation of where we are. This revolution will happen, though whether peaceful or violent, improving or degrading, is unknown. We live in what is now an Empire and Empire only stays together by coercion. As our imperialistic, debt, and consumerist prosperity continues to fade the ability of the Empire to exert this coercion will weaken unleashing the natural forces it is currently subduing. The geographic entity known as the United States is no longer a nation. We were originally, but to win a war of imperial conquest Lincoln needed to transform “her” into “it”. He started the avalanche and it has only gained mass and speed with time. It can only be made into a nation through several subsequent generations of intensive race-mixing resulting in a new, and normative, genotype. What capabilities this new race will possess, on average, is predictable; somewhere between European, Asian, African, and Mestizo but what that will really mean is a mystery. People are generally opposed to marrying and procreating outside their group in spite of the massive corporate propaganda to the contrary – so this miscegenation must be forced. Churches are already on board, some even saying that racially mixed marriages are better than intra-racial ones. If race mixing occurs as a norm it means the end of the White Race, except as a curiosity in exotic locales, since all White countries are being forced to comply with this same situation. Since the White Race built and maintained the Western World what can be built and maintained when they/we are gone?

However, if revolution occurs and the Empire is cast down AND a worse Empire doesn’t rise in its place (a strong possibility), then there is a chance that real nations can be carved from this Empire. It is doubtful that this transformation would be completely peaceful but considering that the primary looming alternative is a World Government with no rival and complete control over our lives, it is a gamble I hope we are willing to take.

Most people don’t seem to see what I think is becoming crystal clear – the Empire is crumbling. The more it crumbles the more the Establishment will turn to the latent patriotism of Whites to rally to its defense. We are useful for nothing else to the Establishment than to keep their Order intact. Otherwise they want us gone and we soon will be if we can’t defend ourselves.

Not only is Conservatism dead but it should be dead. Bush’s loyalists are blind to what they have become. Seeing the leadership of Evangelical Christianity and the Religious Right go compliantly along with the New World Order raises anew thoughts of End Times in my mind. Who really is the Whore of Babylon? Maybe it won’t be so hard to figure after all.

Going from Miers to the New World Order is a stretch in any short article but one is a herald of the other given that the ‘conservative’ establishment has pinned its hopes on Bush and the Republicans. Miers is one more shiner in a series of brutal beatings to the Religious Right from Bush and Co. and only a co-dependent would stay in the relationship. Much of the right wing grass roots don’t want this but they are not yet ready to see the clear but frightening light.

Monkey Brains or Pig Ears?

2005-10-11T13:58:00.000-04:00

Coming up in a few weeks is the election for Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia. This will be the first election since I fully became aware that our political process is a farce. Not that congress is full of crooks farce or taxes are high farce or the current party needs to be swept out of power farce but a COMPLETE farce.

The Dumb party has nominated Kilgore, the Dumber party Kaine. As expected they are suit wearing pretty boys who lick boots like the best of them. The only time I start to get even the slightest desire to support one of them is from his opponent’s sophomorically transparent attack ads. When I start hearing from Dumber how Dumb wants to slash this and cut that I think maybe Dumb’s got some guts after all; maybe he’s not just a puppet of the establishment. Then Dumb puts out his own ad ‘defending’ himself and ruins the whole illusion. Our wonderful News Media which is the public relations arm of the Establishment keeps the political parties in line, asking all the right questions, derailing any chance that things can be corrected through approved channels.

This is the first election I will not support the lesser of two evils. I won’t fall for the pavlovian prodding of abortion or terrorism. I thank GWB for making it crystal clear just how ‘conservative’ he and the entire Right is. To my shame I bought their spin for years. I gave them the benefit of the doubt but now there is nothing left to doubt for anyone who has a shred of integrity left unless their intellect has been catechized beyond repair. That this specimen of exceeding mediocrity can keep the other ‘leaders’ of the Right in tow shows not his, but their treachery. Saying one was mesmerized by the oratory of Cicero is one thing but not that of Gomer Pyle.

Virginia is overrun by an immigrant invasion, whether it is legal or illegal don’t amount to squat, but neither Dumb nor Dumber has issued a peep. They know better. The welfare state, the ethnic cleansing of Whites from our lands, dictatorship (rules by dictation), profligate government spending, tax slavery, public debt, are the issues of the day. None of these will see the least bit of light; our ‘free’ press won’t allow it. Actually that needs to be qualified: some of it will make it by the censors, if it can be used as a prop for more ‘progress’. Just like those liars did with the “population explosion” back in the 60’s and 70’s. There was a population explosion only as long as White birth rates were above replacement. Once they helped ‘fix’ that problem, the “population explosion” as an issue disappeared, even as the 3rd World overruns us.

Here is a very small anecdote to pass on. In the past few elections, besides me, two other close by neighbors have voted consistently Republican. For one of them I know this by curb-side discussions, the other because they always had out signs and recruited me a couple times to work at the polls. Not only have I given up on Dumbo but the first neighbor has really soured on them also. The other one no longer has out the signs and there are only a couple weeks to go. If these folks leave Dumbo for Donkey then the dance will just continue until the rotten floor collapses. It will be one or the other.

The Election will come, Dumber or Dumb, most likely Dumber, will win and then we can avoid having our intelligence insulted any more by the 3rd Grade level discourse. We can then resume at the 6th Grade level where we belong. Things will continue to spiral down afterwards and folks will wring their hands wondering why.

Coming Soon to Your Area

2005-10-10T10:25:00.000-04:00

As I drive to and from work these days in the Washington DC suburbs I see the New America crystal clear. On my ten mile drive I see nary a White face. Mestizos (many of whom refer to themselves as “The Race” or La Raza), Blacks, and Asians are legion; looking at the demographics of the children waiting to take the public school busses is all that is needed. Going back to just 1981, when I graduated from high school here, there were plenty of Blacks and a few Asians but Mestizos were rare. If these new Americans were completely self-sufficient, like immigrants of old were, it would be one thing, but they’re not and the socialism we live under insures they will be assisted by the rest of us. The local home builders and lawn care companies who make a killing hiring these Mestizos at slave wages pass their real cost on to me and other Americans in the area through higher healthcare costs, higher taxes, a dumbed-down student population, and greater crowding. These are called, in economic jargon, “externalities”. The true cost of this labor is not being paid by the employer but is instead externalized; borne by the rest of our society. Our establishment masters slyly call the corporate-sponsored Mestizo invasion “Latino” knowing full well that there are a handful of Whites amongst the Latinos and want them to associate with a propositional ‘nation’ – Latino-hood - instead of their race, White. It should be noted that the Mestizo invasion is the direct result of their economies being ravaged by ‘Free’ Trade coupled with White weakness. If our masters didn’t crave even more conquest through treaties like NAFTA and CAFTA these people would still be living in peace in their ancestral homes; though we still could have stopped them from coming in spite of this. As it is, they have been made our tactical enemies by design; they are fodder meant to undermine a free America. Our real enemy is the same as theirs - the aristocracy of mammon; the elite interests who calculate life and death based on how it impacts their net worth. It is the standard ‘divide and conquer’ strategy that most of our people are oblivious to.

When my wife and I were blessed with a son who was born this past February we saw the preponderance of non-whites in the maternity ward and I wondered how they were paying for it. It was clear they were getting support that I wasn’t. How many of them paid over $10,000 out of pocket, for a non-complicated delivery, like I did? My daughter (and a couple other White kids) being singled out last year by her sissy-white teacher as “privileged” in front of her, majority, darker skinned 2nd Grade classmates was another ‘blessing’ I have noticed of the New America. The children largely are oblivious to this propaganda but it has its impact, intended to both demoralize my daughter and empower the children of the preferred races. What was the privilege of her great-grandparents living on homesteads in Montana, farming in Pennsylvania, and mining coal in Indiana, with no help from anyone but themselves? Thank God they weren’t privileged in the sense of Government preference, like most “people of color” are today, since it is a corrupting influence. Maybe we were privileged by the genetic endowment of our ancestors but that was certainly not what that teacher was talking about. Northern Virginia, just south and west of Washington DC, is the America that is eventually coming to Idaho and Kansas and …, an America that is being ethnically cleansed of our people. Not only are we Whites driven out but our government insures we can’t escape through its anti-White bureaucracies like Civil ‘Rights’, Housing Subsidies, etc. There are fewer places to flee. White flight is even called racist. At all other times, when one race is chased from its home by members of other races, the other races are accused of ethnic cleansing or genocide. In the case of Whites, as with all racial issues, the definition is stood on its head. Even our desire to live is being decried by our masters. They will make sure, as long as they rule over us, that we will have no escape. Be prepared.

You see, there are two circumstances that have come together, partially by design and partially by fate, that have put Whites into a death spiral. The first circumstance is a recurrence of history that greater minds than ours have been unable to avoid. This is the part possibly attributable to fate. History shows that once a culture becomes prosperous its women bear fewer children. Once its own women fail to replace their own people, foreigners are brought in by the ‘pragmatists’ to fill the void. Once a critical mass of the genotype is lost through mixing, the culture is lost. This is postulated as the cause of the demise of many nations that became empires including Ancient Egypt, Greece, and Rome. Now “why” women of prosperous cultures become less prolific is clearly answered. They become more educated and aware of how to avoid the dangers of child-bearing while also being more economically valuable as a mammon producer instead of a child producer. There is an even more fundamental cause behind this that few seem to acknowledge and that is the definition of “prosperity”. Prosperity is almost universally thought of as a socialistic, urbanized, specialized, compartmentalized society instead of as a holistic, agrarian society. Socialism always reinforces dysgenics; that is reproduction by the least successful relative to the more successful, especially, as is the case today, when the socialism is coupled with effete, pseudo-Christianity. If progress always leads to the former (socialism) then it will cause the demise of the people who initiated it. If progress doesn’t poison its own wellspring then it is not, necessarily, self destructive.

The second circumstance seems unique to the prosperity of the European cultures of the 20th and 21st centuries, though it may not be unique; maybe it is also repeating itself, like a Groundhog Day from which Mankind never awakes. It is self-hate through a progression of intellectual movements which pathologized and are pathologizing Whiteness – the bedrock, coupled with Christianity, of Western Civilization. These movements are not only not weakening but are growing stronger as the White Race continues to dwindle (30% of the world’s population in 1900, projected to be 6% by 2050). These intellectual movements have normalized White self-hatred such that every mainstream institution propagates it and anathematizes any who resist it. Read Kevin MacDonald’s The Culture of Critique for a scholarly presentation of this thesis. Even Christianity has been co-opted into being advocates of this Marxist/Jewish inspired White self-hatred. This has long been the case with liberal sects but now the more conservative Evangelical and Reformed sects also are onboard. The dogmas of Man are now totems to which even Christians now willingly bow so that their ‘religion’ stays respectable. I am a Christian but have grown disgusted by this sissified Judeo-Christianity. Judeo-Christians have been told their place and they willingly go there. Judeo-Christianity now fills its role as the opiate envisioned by our masters and the clergy of institutional Christianity gladly complies. Imagine if Luther and Calvin were cut from this same cloth?

Other non-white prosperous countries have to deal with the first circumstance but not the second. They may or may not be bringing in replacement populations depending on how long-sighted they are; the more visionary will never sell out their genes but instead substitute capital for labor. That is what Japan is doing. Since these other prosperous nations have not been demonized as races they can easily, and naturally, continue their self-preservation, for now at least.

The prosperity which leads to socialism combined with institutional self-hatred results in one thing – Genocide. That other races are indifferent to or gleeful of our plight is not too surprising; that Whites agree is. A real prosperity of holistic lives, sustainable productivity, modesty, temperance, godliness, and humility will not lead to the end of our people. Not only will this path serve our people better but it will leave the other races of the Earth at liberty to rise to the level God has gifted them. The imperialism of capitalism and democracy being forced on the world brings warfare, welfare, and slavery.

Last week when I was driving home I happened to get slightly in the way of a Mestizo woman who was driving with her (probably) taxpayer-subsidized brood and I got an earful of the fruits of the New America. I said nothing in return. When one is falling is it wise to question gravity? It is better to see the sneaky hand in the dark that wants to push you over the cliff and send its master over in your stead.

Will we reverse course, learn from history, and save ourselves, or passively submit to our ritual sacrifice? The ultimate act of White egalitarianism is being played out – the absorption of our genes into a new race. The New World Order and their neo-babelist allies who lead the contemporary Christian church see this as a reason to cheer. The neo-babelists expect this new race will be closer to God than that which preceded it. Since racism is such a great sin (in their minds) and race will be destroyed, Man will be holier, right? We will all come together and sing “Kumbaya”, just like when there was only Adam and his mono-racial family. Oops, they forgot about the example of Cain. Oh well, at least their hearts are in the right place. Useful idiots indeed.

The Vainglory of Self Defense

2005-09-22T10:55:00.000-04:00

Recently it has been suggested by a certain Minister of the Gospel of Jesus Christ that kinism is a sin because it is characterized by “malice and vainglory”. Nowhere in the attack by this minister is there an acknowledgement that defense of one’s people has any legitimacy. If every people group in the U.S. were held to this same standard then they (the anti-racists) would only be neo-Babelists. That’s bad enough since it destroys diversity and healthy skepticism and replaces it with universalism and utopianism – it supplants the American Revolution with the French. As it is, since the standard is only applied to Whites in the U.S. and worldwide, they are hypocrites, race traitors, and advocates of genocide.

Was it vainglorious of the American Indians to try and defend themselves from the invasion of their lands by Europeans?

Was it vainglorious of the U.S. to invade Germany in two world wars when they had never invaded us?

Was it vainglorious of the U.S. to build a vast arsenal of nuclear weapons as a deterrent against possible Soviet aggression?

This minister would probably say no on all counts. Apparently unilateral disarmament is a leftist/pinko thing when we are fighting Soviet imperialism but is a virtue when our people’s survival is concerned. It’s not vainglorious to attack and commit mass murder, only to defend your people (and only if they are White) from annihilation.

Some might ask why are these kinists so nasty by posting stuff about murder and mayhem committed by foreign peoples? The answer is simple. It answers the question of “why” to the masses indoctrinated into the religion of political correctness. Why should we (the average white person) care about defending the White race? Are we really different or is it only skin color? Etc. As undiplomatic and uncharitable as these posts may seem they are a necessary antidote to the completely contrary flow of information by our culture which demonizes Whites. 24/7 the average White who uncritically consumes the mainstream media sees that his people are uniquely vile and worthy of destruction. Does this Minister of the Gospel fight this? Of course not. Any “relevant” Minister of the Gospel has got to agree that the White Race is expendable. To say anything to the contrary would cause the minister to face the PC Inquisition and be denounced as a racist. The PC Inquisition is the authority any respectable Minister of the Gospel really fears. Any respectable Minister of the Gospel must refute his PC heresies pronto since his image might be negatively impacted and the seekers might look elsewhere.

If vainglory and malice are evident isn’t it in the advocates of amalgamation and genocide instead of in its opponents?

Japs and Serbs

2005-09-15T12:11:00.000-04:00

Does anyone call the Japanese racist? Or, more specifically, is calling Japan racist normative? The answer to the second question is no just as the first question is meaningless – does “anyone” not do anything? The Japanese are a very race conscious nation. You cannot become a citizen unless you are genetically Japanese. Japan is considered a liberal and enlightened “western” nation. Yet one of the contemporary characteristics of an enlightened western nation is racelessness. Why this is so is a good question but please accept for now that it is. Almost every other nation in the lineup of the enlightened first world has embraced multiculturalism, not just in word but in deed. As best I can tell every country dogmatically multiculturalistic has a (still) White/European majority population. Every country that is not MC is non-white. One of the few White countries that in recent memory made any modest efforts to reverse this course is Austria which a few years ago, through democratic elections, chose a political party that, at least rhetorically, was not as committed to MC as is commonplace in the West. Whereas the enlightened, liberal Japanese have a much more nativist, racially-conscious and self preserving system in place than anything the Austrians have initiated it is the Austrians who were severely rebuked by the West’s ideological torch bearers – not Japan.

Why?

Why are White countries, all of them, expected to be multicultural and not non-white countries, even among the supposedly enlightened? By the standards of liberalism it is arguable that a country like Chad be exempted from “progressive” anti-majority policies, since it is very poor, and the poor are usually held to a different standard in the egalitarian mindset (at least if they are the right type of poor) than the rich. Of course the poverty of Serbia didn’t stop the enlightened from bombing her into line for daring to defy MC. Serbia was defying the takeover of its historic lands by Albanian Muslims and international jihadists and the world community would not allow this since Muslims are on the approved list of people who can be self-preserving and Whites are not. What would be a dilemma for the Jews, along the lines of free pork, is if more and more Whites become Muslim. Will their Christian hatred or their White hatred win out? I think the answer is obvious.

So Japan is exempted though a prosperous first world country. Austria is not exempted though it is also a first world country (though not nearly as prosperous as Japan). Chad is exempted since it is very poor but not Serbia which is also poor. Other very rich and MC-exempt countries include Saudi Arabia and the other Persian Gulf states.

What is the common thread here? It is clear that White racial identity and nationalism is not considered legitimate while for every other race it is. Though many would argue that Nazi Germany should hold a distinct place in our memories this raises two questions. One, why are the white nations that defeated Nazism not exempted from the current anti-white bias? Unless these White nations shed their blood and treasure to defeat Germany in two world wars there would be no anti-white paradigm at all. So the free White countries that ended a menace, less to themselves than to other races, are now being treated like trash. Charles Lindbergh warned of this in 1941 and history is proving him right even though he was and is being vilified for saying so. Two, why are Japanese racial atrocities virtually ignored, at least in comparison to the Holocaust? Especially in regards to the Chinese, Japan was ruthless and this barbarity had a clear racial element.

On a related note, the Soviets were clearly genocidal to many of their classes and ethnicities, notably the Ukranians. If the Soviets were notably ethnic Russians then I have little doubt their crimes would be a much greater part of our collective memories. But since the soviet leadership was a racial polyglot (though disproportionately ethnic Jews) and their victims mostly White they have largely been given a pass.

I just gave a hint as to what I think is a compelling answer to the original question of “why?” Japan, as with all other non-white countries and people groups, is exempted from multiculturalism because they are not considered corporately responsible for transgressions against Jews. Even though Whites fought against Whites to, among other things, save the Jews to the point of tens of millions of deaths of our best young men, Whites are now considered illegitimate as a race. As the black writer Shelby Steele recently commented in defense of this double standard:

"No group in recent history has more aggressively seized power in the name of its racial superiority than Western whites. This race illustrated for all time—through colonialism, slavery, white racism, Nazism—the extraordinary human evil that follows when great power is joined to an atavistic sense of superiority and destiny. This is why today's whites, the world over, cannot openly have a racial identity."

In other words, Whites are uniquely evil compared to the supposedly more moral and less dangerous non-whites. He argues this in parallel with justifying non-white racial consciousness. Shelby Steele is considered very mainstream and his reasoning here is orthodox according to polite society. He will not be shouted down or boycotted or otherwise made into a pariah. To reverse some of these words and replace white with black or brown is considered in bad taste to even think much less speak.

We are called racist when we want to restrict who we allow in our countries. We are called racist when we demand that our governments confiscate less of our money for the purpose of domestic and international interracial wealth transfers. We are ridiculed for standing up to the anti-natal, culture destroying movements of radical feminism and homosexual rights.

Now all of these movements that are deliberately destroying the White race have an unmistakable level of Jewish intellectual leadership. Many argue that Jews are White and they are, when it suits them, just like they are non-white when that suits them. Does anyone suspect that the disproportionate representation of Jews in college admissions and in cultural leadership positions will be hindered by affirmative action? No, since at those times Jews will wear the mantle of minority victim of white, gentile persecution. Yet when it comes to selling things to the public as politicians, CEO’s, and actors Jews will turn as white as snow. Gentile Whites will lose either way. We will be squeezed out between Jews and the preferred minority groups when diversity reigns supreme. We will be hindered by our people’s demonization, leading to no sense of self, when merit reigns.

Wealth, religion, and language mean nothing in the paradigm of political correctness. Everything is subordinated to the goal of destroying the White Race. When will a critical mass of Whites see this and start working to save themselves? If we won’t do it no one else will. We are expected to save the world as our posterity is swept away. What would P.T. Barnum call someone who fell for that deal?

Empty Ritual

2005-09-14T12:59:00.000-04:00

Last night we went to Back to School Night at my oldest daughter’s school; she is now in 3rd Grade. I hate to admit that it is a government school and it is a shining example of the New America where Whites are dwindling to nothingness through infertility, amalgamation, and flight. I want so much to homeschool her before the PC claptrap propagated by this seminary overwhelms her parent’s beliefs but that’s not want I want to talk about right now.

After all the parents were gathered in the Auditorium we were all asked to rise and recite the Pledge of Allegiance. I couldn’t do it – recite the Pledge that is – even though I stood and placed my hand over my heart. The stars and stripes that we have all been raised to revere I now reel from. Up until a year ago I would regard my own thoughts now as disrespectful at the least, if not treasonous. I don’t care anymore about that. I care about the truth, justice, and the survival of my people. When I see that flag now I see lies, injustice, and genocide. Most Whites don’t see this. They see Iowa Jima, Gettysburg, Normandy, and the all the fallen heroes of America; our kin and kith who died for it and what they thought it stood for. It now spits on their posterity. Should we now honor it or them? I choose them. This is a conundrum most neither see, or if they do see can handle. Most choose to hope what I say is not true. They put their faith in false idols like empty patriotism, empty symbols, and empty ritual.

Recite the Pledge in your mind and see if the words are truth or lies. They maybe used to be true but are they now?

I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America (united by coercion) and to the republic (we are a republic like North Korea is a republic – in name only) for which it stands, one nation (used to be of blood and faith, now it is based on an anti-White abstraction), under God (a blasphemous lie now, at least for Jehovah – we should not desecrate His holy name by associating Him with something approaching or exceeding Sodom), indivisible (thanks to Lincoln and his disciples), with liberty (maybe adolescent libertinism fits), and justice (Marx’s and Trotsky’s variety) for all (all who are of a preferred class and have preferred thoughts).

I understand that principles are good and it is good to try to aspire towards principles we can’t even keep, even if it often makes us hypocrites. The problem with the Pledge is that it means (either from its original Socialist intent, and/or through reinterpretation) exactly what is says in an Orwellian way to our current Masters and their adoring slaves. It is a lie from the perspective of a Christian who wants a society built on Christian liberty, freedom, and justice. When words are twisted like this it makes no sense to keep repeating them hoping they mean something different.

America has been changed from within into something diametrically opposed to its very foundations. The pre-Constitutional American States were all (with the possible exception of Rhode Island) explicit Christian Republics. The post-Constitutional Union was at least not hostile towards God’s Law. From the 1860’s until now we have been in a death spiral ever accelerating. Reciting and believing the Pledge is tantamount to digging our own graves. It’s a tough realization for a former mainstream (in the terms of Bob Whitaker – “respectable”) conservative.

American Justice

2005-08-30T15:55:00.000-04:00

If you ever wanted to see a story that so profoundly shows what a revolting monster our government and our legal system has become and how it is the enemy of flesh and blood Americans read this:

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/19/national/19ranch.html?

Note: I've pasted the story within []

[2 Illegal Immigrants Win Arizona Ranch in Court

By ANDREW POLLACK
Published: August 19, 2005
Correction Appended

DOUGLAS, Ariz., Aug. 18 - Spent shells litter the ground at what is left of the firing range, and camouflage outfits still hang in a storeroom. Just a few months ago, this ranch was known as Camp Thunderbird, the headquarters of a paramilitary group that promised to use force to keep illegal immigrants from sneaking across the border with Mexico.

David Bowser for The New York Times

A windmill tower in Douglas, Ariz., was a lookout point for members of a group that tried to prevent illegal immigrants from crossing the border.

The New York Times

Camp Thunderbird is two miles from the Mexican border. Now, in a turnabout, the 70-acre property about two miles from the border is being given to two immigrants whom the group caught trying to enter the United States illegally. The land transfer is being made to satisfy judgments in a lawsuit in which the immigrants had said that Casey Nethercott, the owner of the ranch and a former leader of the vigilante group Ranch Rescue, had harmed them. "Certainly it's poetic justice that these undocumented workers own this land," said Morris S. Dees Jr., co-founder and chief trial counsel of the Southern Poverty Law Center in Montgomery, Ala., which represented the immigrants in their lawsuit. Mr. Dees said the loss of the ranch would "send a pretty important message to those who come to the border to use violence."

The surrender of the ranch comes as the governors of Arizona and New Mexico have declared a state of emergency because of the influx of illegal immigrants and related crime along the border. Bill Dore, a Douglas resident briefly affiliated with Ranch Rescue who is still active in the border-patrolling Minuteman Project, called the land transfer "ridiculous." "The illegals are coming over here," Mr. Dore said. "They are getting the American property. Hell, I'd come over, too. Get some American property, make some money from the gringos."

The immigrants getting the ranch, Edwin Alfredo Mancía Gonzáles and Fátima del Socorro Leiva Medina, could not be reached for comment. Kelley Bruner, a lawyer at the law center, said they did not want to speak to the news media but were happy with the outcome. Ms. Bruner said that Mr. Mancía and Ms. Leiva, who are from El Salvador but are not related, would not live at the ranch and would probably sell it. Mr. Nethercott bought the ranch in 2003 for $120,000. Mr. Mancía, who lives in Los Angeles, and Ms. Leiva, who lives in the Dallas area, have applied for visas that are available to immigrants who are the victims of certain crimes and who cooperate with the authorities, Ms. Bruner said. She said that until a decision was made on their applications, they could stay and work in the United States on a year-to-year basis.

Mr. Mancía and Ms. Leiva were caught on a ranch in Hebbronville, Tex., in March 2003 by Mr. Nethercott and other members of Ranch Rescue. The two immigrants later accused Mr. Nethercott of threatening them and of hitting Mr. Mancía with a pistol, charges that Mr. Nethercott denied. The immigrants also said the group gave them cookies, water and a blanket and let them go after an hour or so.
The Salvadorans testified against Mr. Nethercott when he was tried by Texas prosecutors. The jury deadlocked on a charge of pistol-whipping but convicted Mr. Nethercott, who had previously served time in California for assault, of gun possession, which is illegal for a felon. He is now serving a five-year sentence in a Texas prison.

Mr. Mancía and Ms. Leiva also filed a lawsuit against Mr. Nethercott; Jack Foote, the founder of Ranch Rescue; and the owner of the Hebbronville ranch, Joe Sutton. The immigrants said the ordeal, in which they feared that they would be killed by the men they thought were soldiers, had left them with post-traumatic stress.
Mr. Sutton settled for $100,000. Mr. Nethercott and Mr. Foote did not defend themselves, so the judge issued default judgments of $850,000 against Mr. Nethercott and $500,000 against Mr. Foote.

Mr. Dees said Mr. Foote appeared to have no substantial assets, but Mr. Nethercott had the ranch. Shortly after the judgment, Mr. Nethercott gave the land to his sister, Robin Albitz, of Prescott, Ariz. The Southern Poverty Law Center sued the siblings, saying the transfer was fraudulent and was meant to avoid the judgment.
Ms. Albitz, a nursing assistant, signed over the land to the two immigrants last week.]

As bad as things have gotten, when I first read this I almost thought it was parody. It would have been funny parody but instead it is the disgusting truth. If this doesn’t make you despise the tyrants that have enslaved us and made us their serfs nothing will. It is actually worse than serfdom since it is clear that genocide of Whites is what the New America is after. No, this won’t take place in gas chambers, yet at least, but instead is much more shrewdly accomplished through public policy and attitudes affecting relative birth rates and racial purity. Whites are a free and liberty loving people who are clearly much less compliant than the 3rd World masses who would gladly trade a tyrant who gives them McDonalds, WWF, and WalMart at slave wages for their old masters who didn’t. That they are willing to live under tyranny, as the countries they flee from testifies, and we are not is why they are preferable. They will be the useful little cogs in the machine while we are not. Progress will be able to continue unabated. The theory for why 3rd Worlders ARE 3rd Worlders is not allowed into public discussion as it actually involves immutable racial differences (such as their reduced initiative, innovativeness, and spirit due to the smaller frontal lobes of their brains). I wish I were wrong on this but the evidence is very compelling. We can’t talk about these things since that would be hateful. Only genocide of Whites is allowable AND we Whites must celebrate it.

Read that story and reflect on how, if our government were legitimate, it would do exactly the opposite of what actually happened. Trespassers would face expulsion at the least, if not the risk of death and it would not be our citizens having to do this but the Border Patrol or other representatives of our will. Now our government attacks its own people for daring to defend their own property. A parasite like Morris Dees (in Cyberspace aka Morris Disease) has an extortion racket that uses our ‘legal’ system to deny our citizens self-defense and then steals their property. He should be in prison and the judges that allow these mockeries as well but that would be an older America of real justice and liberty. It is looooooooong gone.

Of course our great ‘watchdog’, the news media, shows how ‘objective’ they are by making the tyrants seem legitimate. If they had wanted to they could have made the judge, jurors, and SPLC seem like scum – easily – but that is not part of their agenda. If they had done their job the tyranny of our government would have been stopped a long time ago; likewise with the entertainment industry. Why are these institutions defenders of tyranny rather than its enemy? Do these institutions really reflect freedom loving, kin loving, productive and independent Americans? What is different about them that they are against us and why are they not honest enough to say so????? I’d speculate as to the overwhelming jewishness of these institutions but that is more unallowable hate speech. Besides, like a good conservative, I have to nod my head when told the Jews are our friends just like they were the friends of Russia and Germany and Spain in earlier times. They were just misunderstood and exploited by evil Christian Whites who needed a scapegoat.

If you are a typical brain-dead American keep loving this thing. Keep sending your sons, and now daughters, to die for its satanic lusts, and to be indoctrinated into its religion. Keep paying your taxes, regardless of how high. Leave your property when they claim it. Ask how high when told to jump. And, most of all, keep hating those of us who don’t. Only then will your continued presence be allowed.

For the rest of us, be wise as serpents. We can’t win a fight until we are clear who are enemies are and who are friends aren’t.

Questions for Judge Roberts

2005-08-12T09:57:00.000-04:00

I recently received an email alert from the American Family Association requesting that American Christians rally in defense of President Bush’s nomination of Judge Roberts to the Supreme Court of the U.S. This is in anticipation of the liberal attacks that are bound to come. In the past I would almost reflexively answer the call to arms, maybe in so small a way as to send an encouraging email. Now, I take everything from the Conservative Establishment with a very large grain of salt. I don’t follow things much in Washington anymore since I believe it is largely a wasted effort while there are other areas we can make a big difference. Still, I have heard some things about Roberts that bring to question Bush’s promise to nominate someone in the mold of Scalia or Thomas. I’ll touch on those things in a moment but if I have heard these things, in very casual perusals of the Internet, wouldn’t Don Wildmon (head of the AFA), supposedly a very conservative and principled man, have also heard these things? If there are serious red flags regarding the judicial temperament of Roberts why wouldn’t the AFA bring those to the attention of its members rather than a call to blind support?

I hope history proves me wrong but right now Roberts looks like a spineless, liberal weasel like Souter, or a constantly compromising, ever “growing”, centrist like O’Connor or Kennedy. (As a side note, this morning I heard the abortion advocacy group NARAL is pulling an attack ad on Roberts. Are these liberals finally realizing they have nothing to fear from this guy? I think so. He seems such a domesticated, tame, acceptable little conservative.)

I’ll raise my two concerns in a series of questions that I would ask of Judge Roberts were I a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee. These questions will not be asked due to both the blind support of Republicans for Bush and due to the liberal religion under which almost all Democrats are acolytes, if not clergy. Liberalism holds these things, that I consider major concerns of Roberts, as sacrosanct, akin to the geocentric universe before the time of Copernicus and Galileo. Cyberspace is the only place these questions will be asked.

1) Judge Roberts, you have said that Roe vs. Wade is the “settled law of the land”. Please explain.

(After the normal doublespeak and sophistry that is intended to bore people to disinterest…)

2) Judge Roberts, can the Supreme Court create “law”?

3) Judge Roberts, which body does our Constitution grant the authority to pass laws?

4) Judge Roberts, has the U.S. Congress ever passed a law prohibiting statutory abortion restrictions?

5) Judge Roberts, has not the U.S. Congress attempted to pass numerous laws to just the opposite effect – to override the “law” created by the Supreme Court?

6) Judge Roberts, is what the Supreme Court decides a law unto itself regardless of what our Constitution says?

7) Judge Roberts, are there no transcendent or institutional constraints that can correct rulings of the Supreme Court?

8) Judge Roberts, isn’t that why you say Roe vs. Wade is “settled” and “law”, because the Supreme Court said it is?

New line of questions

9) Judge Roberts, please explain the concept of “pro bono” legal advice.

10) Judge Roberts, is it fair to say that lawyers only provide pro bono services in support of cases in which they strongly believe?

11) Judge Roberts, are you familiar with the state of Colorado’s referendum, adopted by the vote of its citizens, that would bar special rights to sodomites, or, if you prefer, “gay” people?

12) Judge Roberts, you provided pro bono (i.e. free and voluntary) legal services in support of sodomite activists who sought to overturn the will of the people of Colorado in Romer vs. Evans. Why?

13) Judge Roberts, there are many places you could have provided free legal services where they are desperately needed, where there is no establishment popularity as with “gay” rights, but you chose this cause. What does this say about your value system, your convictions, and your courage?

14) Judge Roberts, are you proud that your volunteer effort helped to overturn this decision of the people of Colorado?

15) Judge Roberts, in what way did the Colorado Referendum violate Colorado Law, Federal Law, God’s Law?

16) So, if God’s Law is no longer relevant what did Thomas Jefferson mean when he stated our rights are “inalienable”?

17) So, if God’s Law is relevant only if it comports with modern sensibilities has it not become Man’s Law and are not Supreme Court Justices modern day prophets of a new polymorphous god?

18) Judge Roberts, are you an example of what President Bush considers a conservative judge in the mold of Scalia and Thomas?

19) Judge Roberts, might you speculate then as to who President Bush might think is in the mold of Ruth Bader Ginsburg? Never mind, don’t answer.

20) Judge Roberts, what are your thoughts on Judge Roy Moore?

Judge Roberts, I never would have known you were a Christian if I hadn’t read it in your bio. That should make you proud.

No further questions.

If Roberts can't "get" these simple things like abortion and sodomite "rights" how the hell can he deal with the harder issues that will come up where he would really have to prove himself a man of the law? The answer is he won't. He has failed on these little things so he should not be trusted on the big things. I wonder if the liberals will do the conservatives job and reject this example of mediocrity? I doubt it. As dumb as they are, they are not as dumb as conservatives.

The Sucker Dance

2005-08-11T14:39:00.001-04:00

The Republican Party, President Bush, the Catholic Church, the Evangelical Church, Wall Street, Corporate America, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, William Buckley, Bill O’Reilly, Fox News, the Wall Street Journal. These institutions and people are what most consider to be symbols of Conservative America. Sometimes they are called right wing as well. Do you consider them conservative? Do you consider yourself conservative? If the answer to both questions is “yes” then the label is meaningless.

These questions are at the heart of what I consider to be the conservative dilemma. Since conservatives are characterized by wanting to maintain the established order and the established order is now rotten (due to institutionalized liberalism) are conservatives, therefore, rotten? Thoughtful Conservatives do not want to conserve everything and instead only want to conserve what is good but they are now a fringe, having been either purged from any meaningful institutional power or been reeducated into seeing the “light”. Conservatives are also characterized by a respect for authority which further exacerbates the problem since our institutions have adopted the fundamental premises of liberalism.

The conservative rank and file still believes in our institutions even though the institutions now embrace those very things Conservatives used to consider anathema. What gives? Are Conservatives nothing other than the practical implementers of liberal ideas? Are we the ones who prevent the crazy uncle (liberalism) from killing himself on heroine by instead giving him methadone and Marlboros? The blogger Lawrence Auster has a term for the mechanism that holds the unholy relationship between conservatism and liberalism together – unprincipled exceptions. Go to his web site (View from the Right) for an explanation much better than I can provide. Sadly the relationship is completely one way. Liberalism is suicidal such that, if allowed to continue without constraint, it would destroy its host. Conservatism provides the brakes to this runaway train but Conservatives are never in the Engine, just the Caboose. Conservatives eventually grow to love the monster more than the Liberals who created it. It would be funny if it weren’t so tragic.

Does the Conservative Establishment (CE) challenge the New Deal era programs that now characterize our government? Does the CE challenge the taking of our freedom of association by “Civil Rights”? Does the CE challenge international American political tyranny through our stated advocacy of forced democratization? Does the CE challenge the imperialism of American Corporate conquest at home and abroad? Does the CE challenge the modern American identity of Consumer instead of Producer? Does the CE ever say that Caesar is subordinate to God and not vice versa? Does the CE do anything to stop the constitutional rape occurring because our Supreme Court acts as the Supreme Legislature? Does the CE try to defend the racial stock that created America in the first place by stopping unlimited 3rd World immigration? Does the CE do anything of substance to return us to a state of natural liberty?

Not only is the answer in almost every case “no” but the CE is often the very proponent of these agendas. Sometimes, comically, they are even opposed by the LE. Conservatives are now the chief defenders of a status quo that is diametrically opposed to Christian concepts of right and wrong.

I no longer think Frankenstein can be turned into Fred Astaire. No charm school, no makeover, no dance lessons, no education can do it. Eliza Doolittle was turned into My Fair Lady but we are dealing with Bella Abzug. Henry Higgins wouldn’t have a chance and neither do we. We now have a beast that should be given enough rope to hang itself. The sooner we jump out of the caboose the sooner those that love the train will catapult over a cliff. I am afraid if we keep trying to stop it we will only become its advocates and, therefore, its food. Leave it and start to build something better subordinating all to The Author of all that is good. It’s been done before and it can happen again.

Your treasure is in your kin and kith, in your industriousness, in your willing submission to Jesus as the Lord of your life, in your voluntary sacrifice for your community, in your love of liberty, and of justice. If you want to conserve the established order your real treasure will be destroyed or corrupted. Which do you choose?

I pray that God will give me the courage and wisdom to follow the example of Joshua who said, "As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord."

George W. Bush and the death of the Reagan Revolution

2005-07-18T11:18:00.000-04:00

Ronald Reagan on our global nemesis, Soviet-led Communism: “Must freedom wither in a quiet, deadening accommodation with totalitarian evil"?

George W. Bush on our global nemesis Islam: “Islam is a religion of peace".

Has George Bush inherited the mantle of Ronald Reagan as the leader of conservatism in America? He is certainly America’s President but is he unmaking the very thing he seeks to defend, namely America itself, by failing to see reality? In this fallen world of ours conflict is inevitable and unending. The challenge is not to eliminate all enemies once and for all, since this is impossible, but to identify and deal with the enemies you face in your time. Fighting the wrong foes or aligning with the wrong friends can be fatal. Where are we now?

One of the first steps in dealing with any problem is identification of what the problem is. Ronald Reagan identified Communism as an enemy. George Bush has labeled terrorism as an enemy. History has proven Reagan correct; Communism was an enemy due to the rhetoric, actions, and the capabilities of its proponents. Its own founding documents, from Marx, through Lenin and Stalin left a trail of its intentions and its actual manifestations did not contradict these intentions. The reality of the countries where it was imposed testified to its fruits including: no private property, no freedom of faith, state-imposed starvation, gulags, etc. Reagan called Communism ‘evil’ because, based on our American standards and the evidence, it was evil. Reagan may have wished Communism was something else but the reality prevented fantasies. Our nation was under a mortal threat and a sizable portion of America’s intellectual establishment answered the call to arms.

George Bush has rallied the United States to fight the enemy of terrorism and more recently has made worldwide democratization the strategic means to fight this enemy. Is terrorism really an enemy? Many others have written effectively that terrorism is a means to achieve an end; in other words it is a tactic. This is not to say we shouldn’t combat terrorism at a tactical level. Not only should airports be secured which Bush has zealously overseen, going so far as to frisk 80 year old women as much as young Arab males, but also our border should be secured and our immigration laws enforced, which Bush has been loath to do. Above the tactical level every conflict has a strategic level – that is the overarching objectives that must be achieved to ensure victory. Bush’s strategy has most recently been articulated as democracy and freedom for all. This time Bush has made a benign process, democracy, a goal when it often leads to the very denial of freedom he purports to desire. Now that Iraqi democracy is leading towards Islamic Law, Sharia, by definition non-Muslim Iraqis have less freedom and we in the West are in greater danger of terrorism. So Bush has created a series of goals that contradict each other. If reducing terrorism is a goal then Islamic ‘Democracy’ will not be good since Islam demands submission of the infidel by any means possible. Likewise if maximizing freedom is a goal then Islamic ‘Democracy’ will not be good since infidels are second class citizens at best under Islamic Law. By making freedom and democracy and the elimination of terrorism goals without dealing with Islam is folly. Substitute ‘Nazism’ for ‘Islam’ and ‘Jew’ for ‘Infidel’ and you’ll get the point.

Why Islam is an enemy of the West is derived from a non-idealized reading of Islam’s sacred texts. Islam cannot be contrary to its own founding documents; the documents that describe what Muslims believe to be the inerrant revelation of Allah through Mohammed, the Koran; and the life of Mohammed and the early history of Islam, the Hadith, Sirah, etc. These are Islam since Allah said Islam is unchangeable. What has been revealed through Islam’s prophet Mohammed IS Islam. Islam cannot be that which we would like it to be if that which we would like it to be contradicts the original revelation. This is simple logic.

What is in Islam’s sacred texts is widely available over the internet. I recommend you go directly to the source documents and see for yourself. Be warned the structure of the Koran is very convoluted and repetitive so it is tedious to spend any time on. For an organized translation of Islam’s sacred texts see the web site www.prophetofdoom.net. The creator focuses firstly on presenting Islam’s own writings in an organized fashion, then in comparing Islam to Christianity and the comparison reveals diametrically opposed Gods. Allah and Yaweh (the God of the Bible) can not be the same. It is hard not to see Islam as a totalitarian political system in addition to being religious. As a matter of fact, its claim to divine origins makes its totalitarian political aspects all the more dangerous since they are non-negotiable from the perspective of Muslims; at least Muslims who follow the commands of their Prophet. Infidels (non-Muslims) are on very thin ice when they decry people like Osama Bin Laden as not being true Muslims when he is simply following the example of his prophet. Bin Laden can be called many things but heretical Muslim is not one of them. We in the West can be so arrogant in projecting our own sensibilities onto everyone else. The libertine ways of the West are anathema to Islam. They are also anathema to many Christians and Traditionalists though we have a dramatically different view on restoration than does Islam. For those who think Islam has no interest in the non-Muslim world wake up. Muslims are much less small minded than many attribute them to be. The "Muslim World" according to Islam is not the Middle East. It is the whole world. Doesn’t this make sense since Allah is believed to be the God of the whole world? The Koran describes the world as being in two camps; either at peace or at war. The "at peace" portion is where Islam rules inviolate. The "at war" portion is where Islam does not (yet) rule. Islam does not project this situation as permanent but as one to be overcome through jihad to make the whole world at peace; i.e. under the rule of Islam.

President Bush currently exists in a world of fantasy where what is true is what we want to be true rather than what is. He believes religion is good without dirtying his hands with the specific mandates of the belief system. He believes democracy is good regardless of what substantive results the process of democracy realizes. He and his strongest supporters, often referred to as neoconservatives are motivated by America the idea rather than America the real. This abstract America appeals to both the business elites who see nationalism as a competitor placing limits on markets and to the Leftists whose romantic views of the brotherhood of man has led them to create and propagate multiculturalism as a non-negotiable and virtuous end. The real America of Americans of flesh and blood and traditional Christian values is caught in the middle of this juggernaut. On one side our "conservative" party wants an open stream of workers into the country to keep labor cheap and profits high, and wanting the freedom to outsource other jobs to wherever it most benefits them, all the while having the blood of America to be their insurance policy if the foreign country infringes on their interests. On the other side our liberal party wants to recast predominately White, Christian America with a new amorphous American who has no identity from which to resist more cultural "progress". No roots and the largest tree will be unable to resist much of a storm.

Ronald Reagan’s reality has given way to George Bush’s wishful thinking. In saner times the opposition party would adjust to fill this ideological vacuum. Now the opposition party is trapped by its own ideology on the other side of reason. The synthesis in our current political dialectic is always leftward since the thesis is always leftist ideology and the antithesis Republican/Rovian compromising. The current Republican political strategy is to surrender ideology to Democrats but then win elections by being more "reasonable" in the administration of these liberal policies. Republicans celebrate when a Howard Dean (or similar juvenile dimwit) is pegged to lead the opposition party. How can a patriotic American cheer this? Shouldn’t we want two responsible political movements rather than one or, more accurately, none. This is the irony; as Republicans continue to win elections America moves ever leftward in its polity. And liberals hate Bush even though he gives them most every thing they want albeit at a slower pace. What a world.

The Reagan Revolution was a true, though temporary, reversal of the then unstoppable march of Liberalism through the American political landscape. He called our enemies and hindrances out, be they Communism, Big Government, Liberalism, etc., and this enabled constructive change and opposition to occur. George W. Bush has embraced Big Government through Compassionate Conservatism, embraced multiculturalism through open borders, embraced the mantle of Wilson, not Coolidge, through his messianic proclamations regarding world democracy and America’s duty to bring it about, and embraced our biggest outward adversary, Islam, by calling it a religion of peace over and over again.

The damage George W. Bush and neoconservatism has caused to conservatism is hard to measure since additionally many of Bush’s strongest supporters (including his Vice President) advocate many of the progressive innovations in the American cultural scene, including alternate definitions of marriage. America the Autonomous, America the Strong, America the Free was no accident of history. It was created and maintained by a very particular people, culture, and religion under just the right circumstances. It can, with great effort, be maintained into the future but it cannot withstand all mismanagement. Much that has now been damaged must be healed and nurtured back to its healthy state.

The neconservative view seems to be that America is the ultimate commodity. To them it is not only the perfect export to the world, to be forced upon its recipients if they do not accept it voluntarily, but it also is infinitely indestructible internally. No amount of immigration or ‘free’ trade or ‘progressive’ cultural change can undermine its existence. It is not protected like a fragile ecosystem but beaten like a rented mule. It is Yucca Mountain rather than Walden Pond. Both concepts defy history and logic. No culture can withstand an open ended assault on itself and still be itself. Likewise, the arrogant attempt to impose ‘America’ on all by force invites more of the former since we open ourselves up to embrace all we dislocate. America may ultimately survive with its name intact but little else.

Maybe that’s what the advocates of the New World Order have wanted all along.

Guns and Babies: the Constitution and Reality

2005-07-18T10:23:00.000-04:00

Did you ever wonder how it is that despite the fact that gun ownership in the United States is supposed to be sacrosanct due to the 2nd Amendment there are thousands of laws across this country encroaching upon and in many cases clearly violating this right? The Constitution protects this right to gun ownership so our Judicial Branch should have and should be striking down many of these unconstitutional laws. Meanwhile, every effort by the people and states to place limits on abortion are struck down, seemingly out of hand, by the Courts. While the right of gun ownership is a true law in the sense of being an amendment to the Constitution, the ‘right’ to abortion came from 7 men (may their names go down in infamy) who were accountable to no one. They created this ‘law’ based on previous court decisions (themselves pulled out of thin air) and a tortured reading of the 14th Amendment. Not being a constitutional scholar I’m sure I fail to understand the court’s transcendent reasoning. The penumbras and emanations they breathe into the Constitution are legion and we little people should remember our place. The ‘right’ to abortion is now considered the "law of the land" even though our constitution grants courts no authority to create law; only the legislature. Civics 101 – the Congress creates laws, the Executive enforces laws, and the Courts arbitrate disputes within these laws.

So our Courts have made up a right (to abortion) that is considered a law even though it was not passed by Congress - far from it. Congress has actually tried to repeal much of the content of the Courts' ‘law’ and the Courts do not allow it. The Judicial Branch has subsequently used their first abortion rights ruling/law as the foundation for a myriad of other similar rulings codifying this ‘right’ deep within the bowels of contemporary jurisprudence. How perverse is this from the standpoint of organizational integrity and the rule of law not even considering the moral aspects? The Courts have created a law they have no authority to create, then they deny the legislature, who do have the authority to create and change laws, from doing so. The duty of Congress in all this is to keep the Judiciary in line when they stray from constitutional mandates and Congress has failed to do so. Sadly a large portion of the Congress shares the Courts’ political ideology and is perfectly content to prostitute the rule of law to a common political cause. We are witnessing a charade that has next to no institutional opposition.

The one institution which could greatly affect an awareness and change in the unconstitutional status quo is not only not being an agent for reformation, it decries those (few) who are. The news media/press has a constitutionally protected right to freedom. Does not that freedom also contain a duty? The answer of course is yes but the press has been co-opted into a political entity whose interests coincide with the very un-constitutional governmental paradigm that it is intended to counter. They perceive their duty not as being a constraint on our Government’s overreach but in saying the Government doesn’t go far enough. The Gatekeeper has become the Doorman and Tyranny is our visitor.

Stories of citizens being convicted for violating gun control laws when the guns were used in defending their homes from criminals are not rare. Instead of this governmental malfeasance being decried it is enabled by the media. Likewise when a baby is pulled from her mother’s womb by the feet and a knife plunged into her head to kill her it is portrayed as a constitutionally protected right (enshrined by ‘law’) by this same press. The Courts have created this mess, the Congress has deliberately failed to stop it, and the Press has cheered.

The gun ownership/abortion contrast is but a vignette in a large parody being played out in America today. The post-modernists seem to have won; life is currently nothing but a construction of the elite; rights are theirs to grant and remove at a whim. The rest of us can only hope to not get in their way. Opposition to the status quo is out of the question by all the powerful institutions that could do so. As our libidos have been emancipated by the Sexual Revolution, so also has our morality and courage been castrated. The Romans were appeased by bread and circuses as their society collapsed and so are we.

Is it time for a second American Revolution to reinstitute the first? We shall see.

Sic semper tyrannis.

Are you a racist?

2005-06-21T15:58:00.000-04:00

If you are a white person who actually cares about your ancestors, yourself, and children you had better be. The contemporary definition of "racist" in the United States and in Europe is any white person who favors their own group and acts to protect it. You don’t even have to hate other groups to be a racist. You can even, like most, hold no antipathy towards other groups at all; but that is not good enough for the high priests of multi-culturalism. Unless you feel no loyalty to your group you are a racist. So the choice is yours: either love and prefer your people and be labeled a racist or shun them and be allowed into the enlightened presence of the gatekeepers of acceptability.

For a long time I cringed at hearing the label but since I have come to realize what being an anti-racist is; a hater of kith and kin, an arrogant ingrate who despises his ancestors and what they created and suffered to protect, a nowhere man whose identity is shaped by others; I now no longer flee the label. Yes, it is unfair in the sense of both semantics and consistency but the alternative is far worse. Semantically it is unfair because it connotes something that is untrue. The average person equates racist with hatred, even violence towards others, which is usually not the case among Whites who want to protect White culture. Anytime a word means something on the visceral, emotional level that is entirely inconsistent with reality it is being used to distort instead of inform. Also this label is not used consistently by those who apply it. That was why I previously made it clear that white people are most affected by this. The label is applied by the news media, by the entertainment industry, by the educational establishment, by the political process, by government, by religions, by the business world, by just about every cultural institution in a one sided fashion. The label is almost exclusively applied to Whites in a way that, following the Establishment’s own definition, makes them anti-White racists. As an anecdote consider the contrasts of Al Sharpton and David Duke. I do this with an apology in advance to Mr. Duke, who though I have never met him, consider him fair minded, intelligent and brave from what I have seen available to the public. It is fair to call them both racial activists, Sharpton for Blacks and Duke for Whites, but look at how they are presented to the public by our cultural gatekeepers. Sharpton is occasionally criticized for being a demagogue but he was treated like a king by all the white politicians in the Democratic Party who were competing against him for the 2004 presidential nomination. Keep in mind Sharpton’s role in both the Tawana Brawley interracial rape hoax and the Freddie’s Fashion Mart arson/murder. This guy has made a living with unsubstantiated racially charged accusations that have directly led to murder and yet there he is a respected leader, in the estimation of our mainstream culture, of the black community. David Duke, on the other hand, has taken on the thankless job of defending White people’s interests. I am not aware of anything he has done that comes close to the mindless demagoguery of Sharpton but he is treated like the worst kind of villain. Read his book 'My Awakening' and see if you see hate in there. Yes, it is "racist" by the definition I led with but that definition is flawed and ahistorical so it is destructive of Whites as a group and as individuals. Duke has committed one of the unpardonable thought crimes of modern life, white racial awareness and a call to action. Add to it that Duke has called into question the role of Jews in the continued destruction of American society and the denunciation is irreversible. Sharpton ‘only’ rants and raves in a completely irrational fashion to extort wealth and create white self-hate and self-doubt, leading to occasional murder by mobs. He plays Stepandfetchit to his Establishment masters who want Whites continually on the defensive. He does a good job which is why the Establishment tolerates him. One is a player the other a pariah. I’ll take the pariah.

Now there is the chance that the love of your own people can lead to a hatred of others but that risk, I believe, is even greater when we are hamstrung into the deceitful ideology of anti-racism/multiculturalism. Man is tribal, for better or worse, and no trendy philosophy can change this regardless of how much it is propagandized, extorted, preached, and coerced into our minds. As a matter of fact the more energetically anti-racism is force fed to us the more rebellion there will be as people are finally forced to the surface to breathe the clean air of the truth.

A love and preference for those that are closest to you is a threat to the New World Order we are currently plunging into but far from leading to a hatred of others it allows for a respect for them since most people make some effort to apply the golden rule. We are all wired to treat others as we would like to be treated even though we often violate this principle.

If you are white and want to throw off the shackles that have been placed on you and your people a good place to start is to no longer run from the Establishment label of "racist", ignoring, for now, the distortions of the term. Not only will you begin to love your own better but, not surprisingly, others as well. The ones to despise are the great nation destroying amalgamators. The political arm of this movement dominates both the Republican (neoconservative) and Democratic (left liberal) Parties. Wall Street and Hollywood also march arm in arm on this. The whole Establishment of America is a great wheel attempting to crush all resistance to it. They preach the freedom of unity and togetherness, free-trade and democracy, when all distinctions, variety, and flavor that make life rich will be grist for their mill of ‘progress’. Remember who the real haters are.

Be counter-cultural; look after your folk. The dead can bury their own.

A Brief Introduction

2005-06-21T15:55:00.000-04:00

A fascinating thing about being human is the opportunity to reflect on things encountered as we grow in life. Sometimes these things are weighty, sometimes they are light, yet they all are captivating. Many of these questions seem silly or irrelevant by the more cynical among us. I don't care since where will they be when I go to meet my Maker. I hope everyone makes an honest effort to arrive at answers since the consequences are eternal. What is the meaning of life? Where did we come from? Where are we going? Were we created? If so, by whom? Who created the creator? And so on...

I ask the deeper questions less the older I get, having by faith, logic, or frustration, arrived at some sort of answer on them, or filed them under the 'mysteries of life' to be contemplated but never rationalized. The relevancy and practicality of the questions now determine whether they are ones I spend much effort on. Now in my 42nd year I am realizing how little I know about this world. By faith I accept there is a higher being who created us and He has revealed himself in the Bible. This gift of faith I received when I was 30 and have stumbled and fumbled my way since then, not really knowing what Christian living is supposed to be.

I have decided to write this blog as diary if nothing else; if it spawns any interest then as a means of communication and dialog as well. If there is no interest other than from me it will at least have served its primary purpose of being a creative release and a means of helping me to better organize my views.

Currently most of my thoughts revolve around family, community, culture, continuity, and how faith in God should guide them all. I am struggling with what I perceive as the overly individualistic philosophy of the evangelical movement of which I am aligned. There is such an emphasis on the individual that community is an afterthought. In my local church we do have a meal together once a week to go with the 2 hours together Sunday morning but not much else. Is this all there is? Once when I sent an email to my Sunday School class about a moral issue being considered by our local school board the interest was almost non-existent. I even got one rebuke for not being the right kind of salt and light. Also I have become more and more aware of some of the effects dispensational theory on the whole evangelical movement. The end result of all this is even in the supposed 'right wing' evangelical Christian community there is a very passive, worldly way in which we are expected to act in the world. Doing anything that is communitarian and counter-cultural (like the Amish) is considered 'legalistic'. My interpretation is that Christ has been overtly feminized by non-Christian elements in our society and that the Church has gone right along because it both wants to fit in with the world and not face the masculine pain of separation from it. From my holistic view of the Christian life something ain't right. Forget the 'mainline' Protestant view on things; they are even more astray from the clear teachings of the Bible. Roman Catholicism is so riddled with anti-Biblical practices as to also be undesirable.

I am searching for the right balance for my family. I want to be the husband and father God calls me to be. A continuity of family and community is needed that can be preserved and passed on until Christ returns. With that in mind there is a time for a Christian to stand up and be counted and not to shrink from speaking the truth even when it violates the false religions and false gods of our day. Our liberty has turned into libertinism. The traditional Christian freedom of our forefathers is now a shadowy memory. I hope to reclaim some of it for my kin and kith before my time passes.